conjugal partner inconsistency

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 27th 2004, 6:07 am
  #1  
Jerry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default conjugal partner inconsistency

Hello, I have a question about applying to sponsor a conjugal partner.

In form IMM1344EA.pdf, section E asks eligibility questions, all of which
must be answered "yes" for the application to be valid. But the third
question reads:

    > Are you sponsoring a member of the family class or a member of the
    > spouse or common-law partner in Canada class?

there's no mention here of the conjugal partner category. Is this just an
oversight, or perhaps are conjugal partners contained in the other
category? Otherwise, if conjugal partners are really excluded, I don't
know why there's even such a category... In form 3900E.pdf, it seems that
conjugal partners are a separate category but just as valid. Any help
appreciated! Thanks --Jerry
 
Old Feb 27th 2004, 6:51 am
  #2  
Andrew Miller
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: conjugal partner inconsistency

Conjugal partners are not a separate category - they are members of Family
class. Read here:

http://www.canlii.org/ca/regu/sor2-227/sec117.html

But they are not included in the spouse or common-law partner in Canada
class.

--

../..

Andrew Miller
Immigration Consultant
Vancouver, British Columbia
email: [email protected]
(delete REMOVE from the above address before sending email)
________________________________


"Jerry" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
    > Hello, I have a question about applying to sponsor a conjugal partner.
    > In form IMM1344EA.pdf, section E asks eligibility questions, all of which
    > must be answered "yes" for the application to be valid. But the third
    > question reads:
    > > Are you sponsoring a member of the family class or a member of the
    > > spouse or common-law partner in Canada class?
    > there's no mention here of the conjugal partner category. Is this just an
    > oversight, or perhaps are conjugal partners contained in the other
    > category? Otherwise, if conjugal partners are really excluded, I don't
    > know why there's even such a category... In form 3900E.pdf, it seems that
    > conjugal partners are a separate category but just as valid. Any help
    > appreciated! Thanks --Jerry
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.