Any one deal with webimmigration.com?
May 21st 2003, 4:41 am
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Any one deal with webimmigration.com?
Hi i was just wondering if anyone here has ever dealt with
Webimmigration.com and what thier experience with them has been (Bad,
Good or otherwise?)
Thanks
Kalaki
Webimmigration.com and what thier experience with them has been (Bad,
Good or otherwise?)
Thanks
Kalaki
May 21st 2003, 5:00 am
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any one deal with webimmigration.com?
Go to:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...gration.canada
and do the search for webimmigration.
You'll find out that their expertise is well below anything you may
expect and that they were not only having their lawyer suspended from
the bar but also they were under criminal investigation. Stay away
from cheap suckers.
On Wed, 21 May 2003 00:41:56 -0400, Kalaki
wrote:
>Hi i was just wondering if anyone here has ever dealt with
>Webimmigration.com and what thier experience with them has been (Bad,
>Good or otherwise?)
>Thanks
>Kalaki
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...gration.canada
and do the search for webimmigration.
You'll find out that their expertise is well below anything you may
expect and that they were not only having their lawyer suspended from
the bar but also they were under criminal investigation. Stay away
from cheap suckers.
On Wed, 21 May 2003 00:41:56 -0400, Kalaki
wrote:
>Hi i was just wondering if anyone here has ever dealt with
>Webimmigration.com and what thier experience with them has been (Bad,
>Good or otherwise?)
>Thanks
>Kalaki
May 21st 2003, 5:39 am
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any one deal with webimmigration.com?
Not looking good for us then....
I have been starting to get suspicious lately ..... we have been
waiting since jan 02 and haven't even been asked for medical or security
checks etc.. my husband is going on his 3rd vistor visa soon (if they
will give it too him, as it states he is supposed to leave country after
such and such a time) After reading some of the posts you linked to
etc... we are becoming severly worried .... and cheated now .... we
don't have the money to hire someone else
I guess we are just stuck
and have to hope and pray we get done someone how
Austin wrote:
> Go to:
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...gration.canada
>
> and do the search for webimmigration.
>
> You'll find out that their expertise is well below anything you may
> expect and that they were not only having their lawyer suspended from
> the bar but also they were under criminal investigation. Stay away
> from cheap suckers.
>
> On Wed, 21 May 2003 00:41:56 -0400, Kalaki
> wrote:
>
>
>>Hi i was just wondering if anyone here has ever dealt with
>>Webimmigration.com and what thier experience with them has been (Bad,
>>Good or otherwise?)
>>Thanks
>>Kalaki
>
>
I have been starting to get suspicious lately ..... we have been
waiting since jan 02 and haven't even been asked for medical or security
checks etc.. my husband is going on his 3rd vistor visa soon (if they
will give it too him, as it states he is supposed to leave country after
such and such a time) After reading some of the posts you linked to
etc... we are becoming severly worried .... and cheated now .... we
don't have the money to hire someone else
I guess we are just stuck and have to hope and pray we get done someone how
Austin wrote:
> Go to:
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...gration.canada
>
> and do the search for webimmigration.
>
> You'll find out that their expertise is well below anything you may
> expect and that they were not only having their lawyer suspended from
> the bar but also they were under criminal investigation. Stay away
> from cheap suckers.
>
> On Wed, 21 May 2003 00:41:56 -0400, Kalaki
> wrote:
>
>
>>Hi i was just wondering if anyone here has ever dealt with
>>Webimmigration.com and what thier experience with them has been (Bad,
>>Good or otherwise?)
>>Thanks
>>Kalaki
>
>
May 21st 2003, 11:29 am
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any one deal with webimmigration.com?
Why do you need a lawyer?????
When I got married here in Quebec, we filled out all the paperwork,
and did the medical, security, FBI checks ect and sent it all in at
one time with application of visa and paid all the fees up front.
While waiting for AIP, we bought a house, fixed it up, and continued
with our life as normal. AIP took 10 months, landing papers took 16
months.
On Wed, 21 May 2003 01:39:59 -0400, Kalaki
wrote:
>Not looking good for us then....
>I have been starting to get suspicious lately ..... we have been
>waiting since jan 02 and haven't even been asked for medical or security
>checks etc.. my husband is going on his 3rd vistor visa soon (if they
>will give it too him, as it states he is supposed to leave country after
>such and such a time) After reading some of the posts you linked to
>etc... we are becoming severly worried .... and cheated now .... we
>don't have the money to hire someone else I guess we are just stuck
>and have to hope and pray we get done someone how
>Austin wrote:
>> Go to:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...gration.canada
>>
>> and do the search for webimmigration.
>>
>> You'll find out that their expertise is well below anything you may
>> expect and that they were not only having their lawyer suspended from
>> the bar but also they were under criminal investigation. Stay away
>> from cheap suckers.
>>
>> On Wed, 21 May 2003 00:41:56 -0400, Kalaki
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi i was just wondering if anyone here has ever dealt with
>>>Webimmigration.com and what thier experience with them has been (Bad,
>>>Good or otherwise?)
>>>Thanks
>>>Kalaki
>>
>>
When I got married here in Quebec, we filled out all the paperwork,
and did the medical, security, FBI checks ect and sent it all in at
one time with application of visa and paid all the fees up front.
While waiting for AIP, we bought a house, fixed it up, and continued
with our life as normal. AIP took 10 months, landing papers took 16
months.
On Wed, 21 May 2003 01:39:59 -0400, Kalaki
wrote:
>Not looking good for us then....
>I have been starting to get suspicious lately ..... we have been
>waiting since jan 02 and haven't even been asked for medical or security
>checks etc.. my husband is going on his 3rd vistor visa soon (if they
>will give it too him, as it states he is supposed to leave country after
>such and such a time) After reading some of the posts you linked to
>etc... we are becoming severly worried .... and cheated now .... we
>don't have the money to hire someone else
I guess we are just stuck >and have to hope and pray we get done someone how
>Austin wrote:
>> Go to:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...gration.canada
>>
>> and do the search for webimmigration.
>>
>> You'll find out that their expertise is well below anything you may
>> expect and that they were not only having their lawyer suspended from
>> the bar but also they were under criminal investigation. Stay away
>> from cheap suckers.
>>
>> On Wed, 21 May 2003 00:41:56 -0400, Kalaki
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi i was just wondering if anyone here has ever dealt with
>>>Webimmigration.com and what thier experience with them has been (Bad,
>>>Good or otherwise?)
>>>Thanks
>>>Kalaki
>>
>>
May 21st 2003, 4:12 pm
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any one deal with webimmigration.com?
You'd better off dealing with regular conributors in this NG
MILLER, HUMPRIES, METCALFE,
They're honest and highly qualified - simple as that...
"Kalaki" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Hi i was just wondering if anyone here has ever dealt with
> Webimmigration.com and what thier experience with them has been (Bad,
> Good or otherwise?)
> Thanks
> Kalaki
MILLER, HUMPRIES, METCALFE,
They're honest and highly qualified - simple as that...
"Kalaki" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Hi i was just wondering if anyone here has ever dealt with
> Webimmigration.com and what thier experience with them has been (Bad,
> Good or otherwise?)
> Thanks
> Kalaki
May 21st 2003, 9:26 pm
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any one deal with webimmigration.com?
The fact that someone is suspended from practicing law does not necessarily
make him/her a good immigration consultant. I would even suggest that
"maybe" the past experience of being able to interpret laws would give this
person an advantage over many consultants out there.
Besides, the prices charged, and the guarantee of "money back" if you don't
get in, could make Webimmigration.com one of the better places to go to get
your assistance. I know that someone with "attorney experience" is working
on my case - not some "self-proclaimed expert" in Laws Relating to
immigration into Canada.
I have yet to read any suggestions that show which consultant is more
successful than the other.
My dealings with them has been excellent, and while I haven't gotten to
Canada yet, I feel secure that whatever possibly can be done within the law,
will happen.
Most of us can do the work ourselves, but when things get complicated, I
feel better in knowing that someone with "lawyer experience" is in the
background is working on my case.
These are just my thoughts.
"Austin" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Go to:
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...gration.canada
> and do the search for webimmigration.
> You'll find out that their expertise is well below anything you may
> expect and that they were not only having their lawyer suspended from
> the bar but also they were under criminal investigation. Stay away
> from cheap suckers.
> On Wed, 21 May 2003 00:41:56 -0400, Kalaki
> wrote:
> >Hi i was just wondering if anyone here has ever dealt with
> >Webimmigration.com and what thier experience with them has been (Bad,
> >Good or otherwise?)
> >Thanks
> >Kalaki
make him/her a good immigration consultant. I would even suggest that
"maybe" the past experience of being able to interpret laws would give this
person an advantage over many consultants out there.
Besides, the prices charged, and the guarantee of "money back" if you don't
get in, could make Webimmigration.com one of the better places to go to get
your assistance. I know that someone with "attorney experience" is working
on my case - not some "self-proclaimed expert" in Laws Relating to
immigration into Canada.
I have yet to read any suggestions that show which consultant is more
successful than the other.
My dealings with them has been excellent, and while I haven't gotten to
Canada yet, I feel secure that whatever possibly can be done within the law,
will happen.
Most of us can do the work ourselves, but when things get complicated, I
feel better in knowing that someone with "lawyer experience" is in the
background is working on my case.
These are just my thoughts.
"Austin" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Go to:
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...gration.canada
> and do the search for webimmigration.
> You'll find out that their expertise is well below anything you may
> expect and that they were not only having their lawyer suspended from
> the bar but also they were under criminal investigation. Stay away
> from cheap suckers.
> On Wed, 21 May 2003 00:41:56 -0400, Kalaki
> wrote:
> >Hi i was just wondering if anyone here has ever dealt with
> >Webimmigration.com and what thier experience with them has been (Bad,
> >Good or otherwise?)
> >Thanks
> >Kalaki
May 21st 2003, 10:45 pm
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any one deal with webimmigration.com?
Rayco wrote:
>
> The fact that someone is suspended from practicing law does not necessarily
> make him/her a good immigration consultant. I would even suggest that
> "maybe" the past experience of being able to interpret laws would give this
> person an advantage over many consultants out there.
>
> Besides, the prices charged, and the guarantee of "money back" if you don't
> get in, could make Webimmigration.com one of the better places to go to get
> your assistance. I know that someone with "attorney experience" is working
> on my case - not some "self-proclaimed expert" in Laws Relating to
> immigration into Canada.
>
> I have yet to read any suggestions that show which consultant is more
> successful than the other.
>
> My dealings with them has been excellent, and while I haven't gotten to
> Canada yet, I feel secure that whatever possibly can be done within the law,
> will happen.
>
> Most of us can do the work ourselves, but when things get complicated, I
> feel better in knowing that someone with "lawyer experience" is in the
> background is working on my case.
>
> These are just my thoughts.
And why do I smell a skunk here?
Consider the history of webimmigration.com and complaint after complaint
after complaint about them.
Consider the posting history of webimmigration.com in this newsgroup.
Time after time, both the legally trained person affiliated with them
and others affiliated with them posted incorrect information at the most
basic levels.
That should be enough to make one want to run.
>
> The fact that someone is suspended from practicing law does not necessarily
> make him/her a good immigration consultant. I would even suggest that
> "maybe" the past experience of being able to interpret laws would give this
> person an advantage over many consultants out there.
>
> Besides, the prices charged, and the guarantee of "money back" if you don't
> get in, could make Webimmigration.com one of the better places to go to get
> your assistance. I know that someone with "attorney experience" is working
> on my case - not some "self-proclaimed expert" in Laws Relating to
> immigration into Canada.
>
> I have yet to read any suggestions that show which consultant is more
> successful than the other.
>
> My dealings with them has been excellent, and while I haven't gotten to
> Canada yet, I feel secure that whatever possibly can be done within the law,
> will happen.
>
> Most of us can do the work ourselves, but when things get complicated, I
> feel better in knowing that someone with "lawyer experience" is in the
> background is working on my case.
>
> These are just my thoughts.
And why do I smell a skunk here?
Consider the history of webimmigration.com and complaint after complaint
after complaint about them.
Consider the posting history of webimmigration.com in this newsgroup.
Time after time, both the legally trained person affiliated with them
and others affiliated with them posted incorrect information at the most
basic levels.
That should be enough to make one want to run.
May 21st 2003, 10:58 pm
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any one deal with webimmigration.com?
Yup, if it smells like a skunk...
Particularly when "Rayco" at the same time is making some stupid
comments about one of the best expert contributing to this group.
Skunk it is...
On Wed, 21 May 2003 22:45:56 GMT, S B
wrote:
>And why do I smell a skunk here?
>Consider the history of webimmigration.com and complaint after complaint
>after complaint about them.
>Consider the posting history of webimmigration.com in this newsgroup.
>Time after time, both the legally trained person affiliated with them
>and others affiliated with them posted incorrect information at the most
>basic levels.
>That should be enough to make one want to run.
Particularly when "Rayco" at the same time is making some stupid
comments about one of the best expert contributing to this group.
Skunk it is...
On Wed, 21 May 2003 22:45:56 GMT, S B
wrote:
>And why do I smell a skunk here?
>Consider the history of webimmigration.com and complaint after complaint
>after complaint about them.
>Consider the posting history of webimmigration.com in this newsgroup.
>Time after time, both the legally trained person affiliated with them
>and others affiliated with them posted incorrect information at the most
>basic levels.
>That should be enough to make one want to run.
May 22nd 2003, 4:12 am
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any one deal with webimmigration.com?
:-)
"Austin" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Yup, if it smells like a skunk...
> Particularly when "Rayco" at the same time is making some stupid
> comments about one of the best expert contributing to this group.
> Skunk it is...
> On Wed, 21 May 2003 22:45:56 GMT, S B
> wrote:
> >
> >And why do I smell a skunk here?
> >
> >Consider the history of webimmigration.com and complaint after complaint
> >after complaint about them.
> >
> >Consider the posting history of webimmigration.com in this newsgroup.
> >Time after time, both the legally trained person affiliated with them
> >and others affiliated with them posted incorrect information at the most
> >basic levels.
> >
> >That should be enough to make one want to run.
"Austin" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Yup, if it smells like a skunk...
> Particularly when "Rayco" at the same time is making some stupid
> comments about one of the best expert contributing to this group.
> Skunk it is...
> On Wed, 21 May 2003 22:45:56 GMT, S B
> wrote:
> >
> >And why do I smell a skunk here?
> >
> >Consider the history of webimmigration.com and complaint after complaint
> >after complaint about them.
> >
> >Consider the posting history of webimmigration.com in this newsgroup.
> >Time after time, both the legally trained person affiliated with them
> >and others affiliated with them posted incorrect information at the most
> >basic levels.
> >
> >That should be enough to make one want to run.
May 22nd 2003, 4:29 am
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any one deal with webimmigration.com?
Could you please give "specficic dates" of these so-called basic level,
incorrect answers?
I would like to see them.
Thank you.
"S B" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Rayco wrote:
> >
> > The fact that someone is suspended from practicing law does not
necessarily
> > make him/her a good immigration consultant. I would even suggest that
> > "maybe" the past experience of being able to interpret laws would give
this
> > person an advantage over many consultants out there.
> >
> > Besides, the prices charged, and the guarantee of "money back" if you
don't
> > get in, could make Webimmigration.com one of the better places to go to
get
> > your assistance. I know that someone with "attorney experience" is
working
> > on my case - not some "self-proclaimed expert" in Laws Relating to
> > immigration into Canada.
> >
> > I have yet to read any suggestions that show which consultant is more
> > successful than the other.
> >
> > My dealings with them has been excellent, and while I haven't gotten to
> > Canada yet, I feel secure that whatever possibly can be done within the
law,
> > will happen.
> >
> > Most of us can do the work ourselves, but when things get complicated, I
> > feel better in knowing that someone with "lawyer experience" is in the
> > background is working on my case.
> >
> > These are just my thoughts.
> And why do I smell a skunk here?
> Consider the history of webimmigration.com and complaint after complaint
> after complaint about them.
> Consider the posting history of webimmigration.com in this newsgroup.
> Time after time, both the legally trained person affiliated with them
> and others affiliated with them posted incorrect information at the most
> basic levels.
> That should be enough to make one want to run.
incorrect answers?
I would like to see them.
Thank you.
"S B" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Rayco wrote:
> >
> > The fact that someone is suspended from practicing law does not
necessarily
> > make him/her a good immigration consultant. I would even suggest that
> > "maybe" the past experience of being able to interpret laws would give
this
> > person an advantage over many consultants out there.
> >
> > Besides, the prices charged, and the guarantee of "money back" if you
don't
> > get in, could make Webimmigration.com one of the better places to go to
get
> > your assistance. I know that someone with "attorney experience" is
working
> > on my case - not some "self-proclaimed expert" in Laws Relating to
> > immigration into Canada.
> >
> > I have yet to read any suggestions that show which consultant is more
> > successful than the other.
> >
> > My dealings with them has been excellent, and while I haven't gotten to
> > Canada yet, I feel secure that whatever possibly can be done within the
law,
> > will happen.
> >
> > Most of us can do the work ourselves, but when things get complicated, I
> > feel better in knowing that someone with "lawyer experience" is in the
> > background is working on my case.
> >
> > These are just my thoughts.
> And why do I smell a skunk here?
> Consider the history of webimmigration.com and complaint after complaint
> after complaint about them.
> Consider the posting history of webimmigration.com in this newsgroup.
> Time after time, both the legally trained person affiliated with them
> and others affiliated with them posted incorrect information at the most
> basic levels.
> That should be enough to make one want to run.
May 22nd 2003, 6:54 am
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any one deal with webimmigration.com?
Do the search on google in misc.immigration.canada newsgroup for
webimmigration and you'll see tons of wrong answers.
And you will also see that Ingrid Chen, webimmigration's only lawyer
is suspended from practicing law since 1999:
http://www.lawsociety.mb.ca/bench_bu...99.htm#suspend
And you dig deeper you'll find that all her appeals until last one in
2002 were dismissed - she is still suspended.
You will also find that she and webimmigration owner Mr. Swedlo are on
bail while being prosecuted on drugs related charges:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...gration.canada
You will also find that Mr. Swedlo was suing Law Society of Manitoba
and his suit was dismissed.
You want more specifics? What more do you want? If you don't want to
read what others have to say in this forum about webimmigration and
their principal and lawyer then do search in public records of law
society and courts of Manitoba - all public records. Simply do the
name search for Ingrid Chan and for Swedlo. After that tell us all
here that we are biased ....
On Thu, 22 May 2003 04:29:57 GMT, "Rayco" wrote:
>Could you please give "specficic dates" of these so-called basic level,
>incorrect answers?
>I would like to see them.
>Thank you.
>"S B" wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> Rayco wrote:
>> >
>> > The fact that someone is suspended from practicing law does not
>necessarily
>> > make him/her a good immigration consultant. I would even suggest that
>> > "maybe" the past experience of being able to interpret laws would give
>this
>> > person an advantage over many consultants out there.
>> >
>> > Besides, the prices charged, and the guarantee of "money back" if you
>don't
>> > get in, could make Webimmigration.com one of the better places to go to
>get
>> > your assistance. I know that someone with "attorney experience" is
>working
>> > on my case - not some "self-proclaimed expert" in Laws Relating to
>> > immigration into Canada.
>> >
>> > I have yet to read any suggestions that show which consultant is more
>> > successful than the other.
>> >
>> > My dealings with them has been excellent, and while I haven't gotten to
>> > Canada yet, I feel secure that whatever possibly can be done within the
>law,
>> > will happen.
>> >
>> > Most of us can do the work ourselves, but when things get complicated, I
>> > feel better in knowing that someone with "lawyer experience" is in the
>> > background is working on my case.
>> >
>> > These are just my thoughts.
>> And why do I smell a skunk here?
>> Consider the history of webimmigration.com and complaint after complaint
>> after complaint about them.
>> Consider the posting history of webimmigration.com in this newsgroup.
>> Time after time, both the legally trained person affiliated with them
>> and others affiliated with them posted incorrect information at the most
>> basic levels.
>> That should be enough to make one want to run.
webimmigration and you'll see tons of wrong answers.
And you will also see that Ingrid Chen, webimmigration's only lawyer
is suspended from practicing law since 1999:
http://www.lawsociety.mb.ca/bench_bu...99.htm#suspend
And you dig deeper you'll find that all her appeals until last one in
2002 were dismissed - she is still suspended.
You will also find that she and webimmigration owner Mr. Swedlo are on
bail while being prosecuted on drugs related charges:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...gration.canada
You will also find that Mr. Swedlo was suing Law Society of Manitoba
and his suit was dismissed.
You want more specifics? What more do you want? If you don't want to
read what others have to say in this forum about webimmigration and
their principal and lawyer then do search in public records of law
society and courts of Manitoba - all public records. Simply do the
name search for Ingrid Chan and for Swedlo. After that tell us all
here that we are biased ....
On Thu, 22 May 2003 04:29:57 GMT, "Rayco" wrote:
>Could you please give "specficic dates" of these so-called basic level,
>incorrect answers?
>I would like to see them.
>Thank you.
>"S B" wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> Rayco wrote:
>> >
>> > The fact that someone is suspended from practicing law does not
>necessarily
>> > make him/her a good immigration consultant. I would even suggest that
>> > "maybe" the past experience of being able to interpret laws would give
>this
>> > person an advantage over many consultants out there.
>> >
>> > Besides, the prices charged, and the guarantee of "money back" if you
>don't
>> > get in, could make Webimmigration.com one of the better places to go to
>get
>> > your assistance. I know that someone with "attorney experience" is
>working
>> > on my case - not some "self-proclaimed expert" in Laws Relating to
>> > immigration into Canada.
>> >
>> > I have yet to read any suggestions that show which consultant is more
>> > successful than the other.
>> >
>> > My dealings with them has been excellent, and while I haven't gotten to
>> > Canada yet, I feel secure that whatever possibly can be done within the
>law,
>> > will happen.
>> >
>> > Most of us can do the work ourselves, but when things get complicated, I
>> > feel better in knowing that someone with "lawyer experience" is in the
>> > background is working on my case.
>> >
>> > These are just my thoughts.
>> And why do I smell a skunk here?
>> Consider the history of webimmigration.com and complaint after complaint
>> after complaint about them.
>> Consider the posting history of webimmigration.com in this newsgroup.
>> Time after time, both the legally trained person affiliated with them
>> and others affiliated with them posted incorrect information at the most
>> basic levels.
>> That should be enough to make one want to run.
May 22nd 2003, 11:46 am
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any one deal with webimmigration.com?
Rayco wrote:
>
> Could you please give "specficic dates" of these so-called basic level,
> incorrect answers?
>
> I would like to see them.
>
> Thank you.
>
Google is your friend. The history of webimmigration.com is well
documented ... I'm not doing the legwork for you.
>
> Could you please give "specficic dates" of these so-called basic level,
> incorrect answers?
>
> I would like to see them.
>
> Thank you.
>
Google is your friend. The history of webimmigration.com is well
documented ... I'm not doing the legwork for you.
May 22nd 2003, 4:01 pm
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any one deal with webimmigration.com?
Another proof of webimmigration's misleading practices. On their own
website they provide a link to their so called "Business Registration
Certificate" -
http://www.webimmigration.com/pdf/we...n%20status.pdf
- but the document is only a copy of business name registration. It is
not a business registration and it is not a business license of any
kind - just a name registration. Businesses are required to at least
have a business license to legally operate. Name registration proves
nothing except that name has been registered.
Many of those who are not familiar with Canadian law may believe that
above document verifies somehow legality of webimmigration's business
- unfortunately it doesn't.
On Thu, 22 May 2003 11:46:26 GMT, S B
wrote:
>Rayco wrote:
>>
>> Could you please give "specficic dates" of these so-called basic level,
>> incorrect answers?
>>
>> I would like to see them.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>Google is your friend. The history of webimmigration.com is well
>documented ... I'm not doing the legwork for you.
website they provide a link to their so called "Business Registration
Certificate" -
http://www.webimmigration.com/pdf/we...n%20status.pdf
- but the document is only a copy of business name registration. It is
not a business registration and it is not a business license of any
kind - just a name registration. Businesses are required to at least
have a business license to legally operate. Name registration proves
nothing except that name has been registered.
Many of those who are not familiar with Canadian law may believe that
above document verifies somehow legality of webimmigration's business
- unfortunately it doesn't.
On Thu, 22 May 2003 11:46:26 GMT, S B
wrote:
>Rayco wrote:
>>
>> Could you please give "specficic dates" of these so-called basic level,
>> incorrect answers?
>>
>> I would like to see them.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>Google is your friend. The history of webimmigration.com is well
>documented ... I'm not doing the legwork for you.
