What's the average age
#31










Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 9,606

We seem to be falling into three camps here:
1) Young and foolish
2) Early mid-life crisis
3) Older and foolish (you don't retire to here; you retire out of here)
1) Young and foolish
2) Early mid-life crisis
3) Older and foolish (you don't retire to here; you retire out of here)
#32
Originally Posted by Souvenir
We seem to be falling into three camps here:
1) Young and foolish
2) Early mid-life crisis
3) Older and foolish (you don't retire to here; you retire out of here)
1) Young and foolish
2) Early mid-life crisis
3) Older and foolish (you don't retire to here; you retire out of here)
er -- (probably a mistake asking will get refered to loads of previous threads but here goes) whats wrong with retiring to canada??
#33
Originally Posted by batty-x-ray
older and foolish me, some things you never grow out of
er -- (probably a mistake asking will get refered to loads of previous threads but here goes) whats wrong with retiring to canada??
er -- (probably a mistake asking will get refered to loads of previous threads but here goes) whats wrong with retiring to canada??
#34
Originally Posted by dbd33
It gets cold. Snow has to be shovelled. Old Canadians avoid that by retiring to America.
#35
Originally Posted by batty-x-ray
so the answer is staff??
#36
Originally Posted by Souvenir
We seem to be falling into three camps here:
1) Young and foolish
2) Early mid-life crisis
3) Older and foolish (you don't retire to here; you retire out of here)
1) Young and foolish
2) Early mid-life crisis
3) Older and foolish (you don't retire to here; you retire out of here)
Kind of a ...."life crisis"....knowing that one has to do "something" before it's too late for a range of life options and knowing that that something has to be done before conditions deteriorate beyond our ability to achieve the "something".
Thinks "should've done this years ago" but knows that wasn't possible at the time and that the last few years have put in place the building blocks of experience and financial capital to achieve the "something" while still having a level of security and protection of existing Q-O-L in the process.
Rich.
#37
BE Forum Addict






Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,222
From: Vancouver, BC (originally from Huddersfield, W. Yorkshire)











Thanks! Had a good day yesterday, and am off to Amsterdam for the weekend!!! Just getting on with enjoying life for now, Canada will (hopefully) happen eventually
Originally Posted by Wannabe
Happy Birthday! 


Hopefully you'll not be retired by the time you land... *grin*



Hopefully you'll not be retired by the time you land... *grin*
#38
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 605
From: Calgary











Originally Posted by dbd33
It gets cold. Snow has to be shovelled. Old Canadians avoid that by retiring to America.
Many retiring from the US there too, trying to flee the Bush administration etc
We "retired" here in our early forties, why? ... because we could.
Not all retirees are old.
Last edited by CalgaryBlade; Dec 15th 2005 at 11:58 am.
#39
Originally Posted by CalgaryBlade
Or to western Canada, specifically Vancouver Island.
Many retiring from the US there too, trying to flee the Bush administration etc
We "retired" here in our early forties, why? ... because we could.
Not all retirees are old.
Many retiring from the US there too, trying to flee the Bush administration etc
We "retired" here in our early forties, why? ... because we could.
Not all retirees are old.
I took that to mean that you were in Calgary for the moment for work related reasons. Maybe that's wrong but I suspect you're using a novel definition of "retired". Do you, or your partner, currently have full time paid employment ?
On edit : I don't dispute that BC is a retirement destination, I just think more Canadians go to the sun belt states.
Last edited by dbd33; Dec 15th 2005 at 12:21 pm.
#40
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 605
From: Calgary











Originally Posted by dbd33
Didn't you post a while back that you were thinking of moving to BC later in life ?
I took that to mean that you were in Calgary for the moment for work related reasons. Maybe that's wrong but I suspect you're using a novel definition of "retired". Do you, or your partner, currently have full time paid employment ?
I took that to mean that you were in Calgary for the moment for work related reasons. Maybe that's wrong but I suspect you're using a novel definition of "retired". Do you, or your partner, currently have full time paid employment ?
Once the kids have flown the nest, we will look at Victoria/Kelowna etc again.
We're retired on the basis that we can live off our investment income. However, to keep our minds active we both do consultancy work in our respective fields. Not full time though.
There was an article in the Globe and Mail recently about the new definition of retirement. Many baby-boomers are taking packages/early retirement but are still too young to sit in an armchair drooling so top up their income and keep their brains ticking over by consulting or voluntary work.
#41
Originally Posted by mrrod
Just a thought, what is the average age for people to apply for perm res to canada?
I'm 37 years old and sometimes wonder if i'm a bit long in the tooth to apply!!!
I'm 37 years old and sometimes wonder if i'm a bit long in the tooth to apply!!!
#42
Originally Posted by CalgaryBlade
We chose Calgary because of its proximity to the mountains, good quality schooling, excellent facilities and we have friends with children here. Had we not had children we could just as easily have moved to Victoria, Kelowna or the BC coast.
Once the kids have flown the nest, we will look at Victoria/Kelowna etc again.
We're retired on the basis that we can live off our investment income. However, to keep our minds active we both do consultancy work in our respective fields. Not full time though.
There was an article in the Globe and Mail recently about the new definition of retirement. Many baby-boomers are taking packages/early retirement but are still too young to sit in an armchair drooling so top up their income and keep their brains ticking over by consulting or voluntary work.
Once the kids have flown the nest, we will look at Victoria/Kelowna etc again.
We're retired on the basis that we can live off our investment income. However, to keep our minds active we both do consultancy work in our respective fields. Not full time though.
There was an article in the Globe and Mail recently about the new definition of retirement. Many baby-boomers are taking packages/early retirement but are still too young to sit in an armchair drooling so top up their income and keep their brains ticking over by consulting or voluntary work.
Packages are very much the Canadian way. I've consulted on and off for a quango for years. Recently I met someone there who has taken the package from the same organisation three times. It's for less money each time, of course, but still the most recent one was over $100,000 and he's since been hired back. The neighbours on both sides here took packages and then went back to their old jobs as consultants. I understand why all this works in the US, consultants don't get company paid healthcare, but why firms do it here is beyond me.
Still, it's not retirement, is it ? It may be working part time, slowing down a bit, changing lifestyle, but it's not living on a pension for the rest of your days, it's not never working again.
Last edited by dbd33; Dec 15th 2005 at 2:07 pm.
#43
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 605
From: Calgary











Originally Posted by dbd33
Still, it's not retirement, is it ? It may be working part time, slowing down a bit, changing lifestyle, but it's not living on a pension for the rest of your days, it's not never working again.
My pensions don't pay out for 17 years, but then pensions are only tax effecient investments so where's the difference between living on a pension and on investment income? A gold watch?
I tried doing nothing for a while and hated it.
#44
I'm 41 (nearly 42) now OH 36.
Started down this looooong road when I was 40, don't know which "class" you'd put me in, but I consider myself to be the mid-life crisis without the crisis (and not so much of the mid-life
).
We basically fell in love with the place and found that, after researching extensively, we could come over and start a new life in BC!
Roll on next summer (hoopefully!)
KennyJosie
Started down this looooong road when I was 40, don't know which "class" you'd put me in, but I consider myself to be the mid-life crisis without the crisis (and not so much of the mid-life
).We basically fell in love with the place and found that, after researching extensively, we could come over and start a new life in BC!
Roll on next summer (hoopefully!)
KennyJosie
#45
Just Joined
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12
From: Vancouver

Originally Posted by cov-canuck
26 for me, and Mr Cov-Canuck (aka OXOCube) is 30. We'll be emigrating at our current ages.



