![]() |
Re: What car to get
2.4 if good. Is it a SUV? it looks quite tall.
|
Re: What car to get
Originally Posted by busycouple
(Post 9696635)
2.4 if good. Is it a SUV? it looks quite tall.
|
Re: What car to get
Actually in North American terms, the caliber is a compact car. A crossover would be the Dodge Journey.
|
Re: What car to get
Originally Posted by Atlantic Xpat
(Post 9696672)
Actually in North American terms, the caliber is a compact car. A crossover would be the Dodge Journey.
|
Re: What car to get
Originally Posted by busycouple
(Post 9696471)
Not really my ideal SUV but thanks, know of any more?
|
Re: What car to get
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 9696743)
Surely an SUV is necessarily a vehicle larger than needed with less interior space than appropriate for the exterior dimensions. It can't be fuel efficient because a van or estate car of the same interior capacity is more aerodynamic. It's a styling exercise in which fuel economy is sacrificed for the appearance of being able to mount small kerbs. All that said, I found the Toyota Land Cruiser to be reasonably economical for something that could carry 20 small square bales across any terrain. It returned a consistent 14mpg.
|
Re: What car to get
Originally Posted by busycouple
(Post 9696363)
any recommendations on any good mpg SUV's then?
Bare in mind too that a 2.5l gasoline engine here is on the frugal end. None of your 2l turbodiesels to be found here. (except maybe the baby VW SUV?) The caveat to that recommendation is of course that you get the same functionality and better economy from an imprezza... Very few people actually need an SUV. |
Re: What car to get
Originally Posted by Atlantic Xpat
(Post 9696754)
But the Estate car scarcely exists in North America. Subaru Outback, Golf Estate, Mercedes whatever, that's about it. Failing that, if one needs a larger vehicle then a SUV, Crossover or <shudders> minivan is the only choice. Sad but true.
|
Re: What car to get
Originally Posted by busycouple
(Post 9696363)
any recommendations on any good mpg SUV's then?
|
Re: What car to get
Originally Posted by R I C H
(Post 9696834)
The non turbos are somewhat better, but less fun to drive.
However, I get wherever we are going a lot sooner:o. |
Re: What car to get
Nissan Xterra's seem to hold their prices fairly well as do Freelanders/Land Rovers, smaller engined Explorer's are not horrendous on gas and neither are smaller engined Jeeps, I quite enjoyed the Liberty I had during the winter last year, it was a standard too and pretty sure footed in the snow and ice.
We have had more than our fair share of cars, gas consumption doesn't usually enter the equation, it's more of OH wants it, so OH gets it. Gas pigs that come to mind Jeep Grand Cherokee and Lincoln Navigator on the bigger ones and awful in the snow was a Dodge Durango, that was one of the briefest owned vehicles after months of looking for one:blink: 2WD trucks are also difficult in the snow and ice as are Mustangs:rofl: |
Re: What car to get
Originally Posted by busycouple
(Post 9694091)
Thanks for the comments guys. I was thinking of getting a SUV before but now I think I will strongly consider a standard car. The low mpg's that are got with SUV's means there wont be much of a saving on fuel costs, and I will probably spend as much as I do back home.
Unless someone knows of dood priced version that gives decent mpg. Maybe like a Nissan Juke or something. Have you considered a roof-rack? |
Re: What car to get
I think I must have looked at lot of SUV's now but they all seem to have quite bad mpg's. I wanted a SUV as I'm quite tall and having someone sit behind me in a standard car means their legs wont fit. I will try to find a car now.
|
Re: What car to get
Originally Posted by busycouple
(Post 9696912)
I think I must have looked at lot of SUV's now but they all seem to have quite bad mpg's. I wanted a SUV as I'm quite tall and having someone sit behind me in a standard car means their legs wont fit. I will try to find a car now.
How tall? Bare in mind that cars here are in general a lot larger than in the UK. Any midsize car will have reasonable room in the back, and if you go larger you can hold a party back there. SUVs really dont offer more interior legroom anyway, in fact the worst car Ive had here for rear space was the Jeep Cherokee. If you really need the rear legroom then look at minivans with the individual captains seats options. Gas Pigs, but better than SUVs. |
Re: What car to get
Im about 6'3 and a bit. I dont really want a mini van lol so I will stick to cars.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 4:06 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.