Waivering Teenager!!!
#31
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Doha, Qatar
Posts: 790
Re: Waivering Teenager!!!
My sister in law moved to Holland with 2 teenage kids about a couple of years ago. 13 yrs or so. The kids were always making comments like we dont want to go and we will come back to the UK as soon as we can.
Nowaday if you ask them, they love Holland and wouldnt dream of returning to the UK because of their new friends, schools, better standard of living etc. So I guess kids change.
Nowaday if you ask them, they love Holland and wouldnt dream of returning to the UK because of their new friends, schools, better standard of living etc. So I guess kids change.
#32
Re: Waivering Teenager!!!
Originally Posted by Morwenna
I'd disagree with that. Not that I don't think exams are important, but if one is planning on coming to Canada permanently, then GCSE's are fairly worthless here, and it would be more beneficial, in my opinion, to get into the high school system here as early as possible.
I think that, even if one is prepared to live out one's days over here, it's inappropriate to do anything that will limit one's children's ability to return. "permanently" shouldn't imply one's children as well as one's self.
#33
Re: Waivering Teenager!!!
Originally Posted by dbd33
It was for portability that my children took the bac (www.ibo.org) but our line of thought is slightly different; we came to Canada because as uneducated people we felt we could do better in an unsophisticated country. That's not true of the children; they've been quite well educated and should now be able to compete in Europe. In order to keep the possibilities open we're maintained their European passports and discouraged them from pursuing subjects, such as law, which have limited application outside the country of teaching.
I think that, even if one is prepared to live out one's days over here, it's inappropriate to do anything that will limit one's children's ability to return. "permanently" shouldn't imply one's children as well as one's self.
I think that, even if one is prepared to live out one's days over here, it's inappropriate to do anything that will limit one's children's ability to return. "permanently" shouldn't imply one's children as well as one's self.