British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   Canada (https://britishexpats.com/forum/canada-56/)
-   -   Vancouver RE: update (https://britishexpats.com/forum/canada-56/vancouver-re-update-809530/)

ExKiwilass Sep 17th 2013 3:14 am

Vancouver RE: update
 
1 Attachment(s)
got this in my email today, thought it might be useful for expats here:

Tirytory Sep 17th 2013 4:27 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 
Crikey it's not cheap to live there.

*wins understatement of the year award*

CanadaJimmy Sep 17th 2013 4:36 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 
August is typically the most expensive time of the year to buy, so that has probably inflated those prices a bit. The averages are a bit misleading too, there are certainly decent homes available in Langley for a $100k less than the average listed there

ExKiwilass Sep 17th 2013 4:39 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 
it's not listing the average price, rather the median. Don't know why.

JonboyE Sep 17th 2013 6:49 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 
I think the median is more useful than a mean in many cases. Near where I live houses on the ocean side of Marine Drive sell for c $10m, and on the land side $1m. Knowing the average price is $5.5m is no use to someone wanting to spend either $1m or $10m.

In South Surrey/White Rock there are a lot of houses in the $750k - $1m range. As mentioned, waterfront is considerably more expensive, and there is a house in Ocean Park that I know cost over $70 million to build. I have no idea what it would sell for.

The information sheet shows the median price in this area for a single family home at high $800ks. I think that is a useful number for potential buyers. Given the distribution is skewed by a relatively few number of super expensive homes I think the arithmetic mean will be quite a bit higher.

ExKiwilass Sep 17th 2013 8:04 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 
good point about the median, JBE.

I think the median is about right for my neighbourhood.

it's clear condos/townhomes are much cheaper, wherever you are.

CanadaJimmy Sep 17th 2013 9:29 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by ExKiwilass (Post 10905429)
it's clear condos/townhomes are much cheaper, wherever you are.

They can also me cheaper to live in as well, Strata fees often work out less than paying property taxes and routine maintenance, unless you have a greedy Strata.

As much as I would like a proper detached house, me and the gf are facing the reality that a townhome maybe our best option financially, even though I dislike them from a city planning perspective.

Still would love to get a fixer upper (or to use the affectionate realtor terms "Old Timer" and "Character") detached house. There are some detached homes in Langley for around the $450k mark. I do feel like there's more equity to be made there than in a townhome. I expect newer townhomes will probably have a flatline value for the first 5-10 years.

JonboyE Sep 17th 2013 10:42 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 
You still pay property taxes if you buy a condo or townhouse. They are not included in the strata fee.

Fees are often higher in new developments because the strata council has to build up a cash reserve. You hope that the strata council gets some professional advice on planned maintenance and sets its fees accordingly. It doesn't always happen though.

CanadaJimmy Sep 17th 2013 12:59 pm

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by JonboyE (Post 10905673)
You still pay property taxes if you buy a condo or townhouse. They are not included in the strata fee.

Is it not reduced though because the Strata covers things like recycling and garbage?

scrubbedexpat091 Sep 17th 2013 1:55 pm

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by CanadaJimmy (Post 10905842)
Is it not reduced though because the Strata covers things like recycling and garbage?

Not all city's pay for garbage pick up and recycling through taxes, some charge a monthly fee for the service.

Aviator Sep 17th 2013 2:58 pm

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by CanadaJimmy (Post 10905842)
Is it not reduced though because the Strata covers things like recycling and garbage?

Property tax is separate from city utilities. Garbage, recycling is billed separately to property tax as is water and sewer in some municipalities.

ExKiwilass Sep 18th 2013 2:25 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by JonboyE (Post 10905673)
You still pay property taxes if you buy a condo or townhouse. They are not included in the strata fee.

Fees are often higher in new developments because the strata council has to build up a cash reserve. You hope that the strata council gets some professional advice on planned maintenance and sets its fees accordingly. It doesn't always happen though.

low strata fees would be a red flag to me...it often means they are deferring necessary maintenance/upkeep which means there'll probably be a big fat assessment down the line...

ExKiwilass Sep 18th 2013 2:25 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by CanadaJimmy (Post 10905576)
They can also me cheaper to live in as well, Strata fees often work out less than paying property taxes and routine maintenance, unless you have a greedy Strata.

As much as I would like a proper detached house, me and the gf are facing the reality that a townhome maybe our best option financially, even though I dislike them from a city planning perspective.

Still would love to get a fixer upper (or to use the affectionate realtor terms "Old Timer" and "Character") detached house. There are some detached homes in Langley for around the $450k mark. I do feel like there's more equity to be made there than in a townhome. I expect newer townhomes will probably have a flatline value for the first 5-10 years.

just curious - why do you dislike them from a city planning perspective?

CanadaJimmy Sep 20th 2013 7:52 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by ExKiwilass (Post 10906700)
just curious - why do you dislike them from a city planning perspective?

Townhome complexes are usually enclaves separated from the rest of the community, with limited entry/exit points. They appeal to people for their quietness, and often have names like "Village" and "Park", which lures people in. In reality however their compact nature offers very little privacy, the landscape features of the complex often cut it off from everything in the surrounding community, meaning actually walking by foot somewhere can be a drag, you may have to backtrack to get out the complex and then walk to the shops, and of course, each of these complexes has it's own "identity", isolating it from other nearby ones. This and the fact all units inside the complex are going to be roughly the same price range, meaning a certain category of people will fill up the entire complex, discourages neighborhood life - there won't be a healthy mix of retirees, young people, middle ages people, families etc, just one "type" of person. By having each complex separated in this way, instead of being on the general grid system, although it may look nice, it does not build a healthy community in my opinion.

Mike Gas Sep 23rd 2013 12:41 pm

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 
Was talking to a Realtor a few weeks ago who is one of the top earners in Vancouver and he is suggesting of record that the market is heading for a massive fall and he was making the best of it before the bubble bursts and he has a few lean years.
So be careful if your thinking in buying now.


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 5:07 pm.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.