British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   Canada (https://britishexpats.com/forum/canada-56/)
-   -   Vancouver RE: update (https://britishexpats.com/forum/canada-56/vancouver-re-update-809530/)

ExKiwilass Sep 17th 2013 3:14 am

Vancouver RE: update
 
1 Attachment(s)
got this in my email today, thought it might be useful for expats here:

Tirytory Sep 17th 2013 4:27 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 
Crikey it's not cheap to live there.

*wins understatement of the year award*

CanadaJimmy Sep 17th 2013 4:36 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 
August is typically the most expensive time of the year to buy, so that has probably inflated those prices a bit. The averages are a bit misleading too, there are certainly decent homes available in Langley for a $100k less than the average listed there

ExKiwilass Sep 17th 2013 4:39 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 
it's not listing the average price, rather the median. Don't know why.

JonboyE Sep 17th 2013 6:49 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 
I think the median is more useful than a mean in many cases. Near where I live houses on the ocean side of Marine Drive sell for c $10m, and on the land side $1m. Knowing the average price is $5.5m is no use to someone wanting to spend either $1m or $10m.

In South Surrey/White Rock there are a lot of houses in the $750k - $1m range. As mentioned, waterfront is considerably more expensive, and there is a house in Ocean Park that I know cost over $70 million to build. I have no idea what it would sell for.

The information sheet shows the median price in this area for a single family home at high $800ks. I think that is a useful number for potential buyers. Given the distribution is skewed by a relatively few number of super expensive homes I think the arithmetic mean will be quite a bit higher.

ExKiwilass Sep 17th 2013 8:04 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 
good point about the median, JBE.

I think the median is about right for my neighbourhood.

it's clear condos/townhomes are much cheaper, wherever you are.

CanadaJimmy Sep 17th 2013 9:29 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by ExKiwilass (Post 10905429)
it's clear condos/townhomes are much cheaper, wherever you are.

They can also me cheaper to live in as well, Strata fees often work out less than paying property taxes and routine maintenance, unless you have a greedy Strata.

As much as I would like a proper detached house, me and the gf are facing the reality that a townhome maybe our best option financially, even though I dislike them from a city planning perspective.

Still would love to get a fixer upper (or to use the affectionate realtor terms "Old Timer" and "Character") detached house. There are some detached homes in Langley for around the $450k mark. I do feel like there's more equity to be made there than in a townhome. I expect newer townhomes will probably have a flatline value for the first 5-10 years.

JonboyE Sep 17th 2013 10:42 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 
You still pay property taxes if you buy a condo or townhouse. They are not included in the strata fee.

Fees are often higher in new developments because the strata council has to build up a cash reserve. You hope that the strata council gets some professional advice on planned maintenance and sets its fees accordingly. It doesn't always happen though.

CanadaJimmy Sep 17th 2013 12:59 pm

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by JonboyE (Post 10905673)
You still pay property taxes if you buy a condo or townhouse. They are not included in the strata fee.

Is it not reduced though because the Strata covers things like recycling and garbage?

scrubbedexpat091 Sep 17th 2013 1:55 pm

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by CanadaJimmy (Post 10905842)
Is it not reduced though because the Strata covers things like recycling and garbage?

Not all city's pay for garbage pick up and recycling through taxes, some charge a monthly fee for the service.

Aviator Sep 17th 2013 2:58 pm

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by CanadaJimmy (Post 10905842)
Is it not reduced though because the Strata covers things like recycling and garbage?

Property tax is separate from city utilities. Garbage, recycling is billed separately to property tax as is water and sewer in some municipalities.

ExKiwilass Sep 18th 2013 2:25 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by JonboyE (Post 10905673)
You still pay property taxes if you buy a condo or townhouse. They are not included in the strata fee.

Fees are often higher in new developments because the strata council has to build up a cash reserve. You hope that the strata council gets some professional advice on planned maintenance and sets its fees accordingly. It doesn't always happen though.

low strata fees would be a red flag to me...it often means they are deferring necessary maintenance/upkeep which means there'll probably be a big fat assessment down the line...

ExKiwilass Sep 18th 2013 2:25 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by CanadaJimmy (Post 10905576)
They can also me cheaper to live in as well, Strata fees often work out less than paying property taxes and routine maintenance, unless you have a greedy Strata.

As much as I would like a proper detached house, me and the gf are facing the reality that a townhome maybe our best option financially, even though I dislike them from a city planning perspective.

Still would love to get a fixer upper (or to use the affectionate realtor terms "Old Timer" and "Character") detached house. There are some detached homes in Langley for around the $450k mark. I do feel like there's more equity to be made there than in a townhome. I expect newer townhomes will probably have a flatline value for the first 5-10 years.

just curious - why do you dislike them from a city planning perspective?

CanadaJimmy Sep 20th 2013 7:52 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by ExKiwilass (Post 10906700)
just curious - why do you dislike them from a city planning perspective?

Townhome complexes are usually enclaves separated from the rest of the community, with limited entry/exit points. They appeal to people for their quietness, and often have names like "Village" and "Park", which lures people in. In reality however their compact nature offers very little privacy, the landscape features of the complex often cut it off from everything in the surrounding community, meaning actually walking by foot somewhere can be a drag, you may have to backtrack to get out the complex and then walk to the shops, and of course, each of these complexes has it's own "identity", isolating it from other nearby ones. This and the fact all units inside the complex are going to be roughly the same price range, meaning a certain category of people will fill up the entire complex, discourages neighborhood life - there won't be a healthy mix of retirees, young people, middle ages people, families etc, just one "type" of person. By having each complex separated in this way, instead of being on the general grid system, although it may look nice, it does not build a healthy community in my opinion.

Mike Gas Sep 23rd 2013 12:41 pm

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 
Was talking to a Realtor a few weeks ago who is one of the top earners in Vancouver and he is suggesting of record that the market is heading for a massive fall and he was making the best of it before the bubble bursts and he has a few lean years.
So be careful if your thinking in buying now.

ExKiwilass Sep 24th 2013 2:01 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 
i heard the same thing a few years ago Mike = a few realtors 'quit" publically and one moved to PEI cos the market was going to fall...

didn't happen

I see the one who moved to PEI has come back now, tail between legs, being very quiet..

Mike Gas Sep 24th 2013 5:59 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 
Of course house prices only ever rise, its a big bubble and they always pop.

ExKiwilass Sep 24th 2013 7:06 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 
whatever mike.

no one knows what is going to happen, even and including realtors. Maybe it'll drop, maybe it' wont. I've seen people burned by waiting too long, and I've also got friends who are in negative equity in the US. Who knows.

JonboyE Sep 24th 2013 7:47 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 
It reminds me of someone I met in 2001 and still see now and again at social gatherings. At the time he was renting a home in South Surrey. He said he didn't want to buy because he thought the market was overpriced and he was waiting for it to cool off. To be fair to him prices had been increasing steadily for two years.

He is still renting and paying $4,000 a month. If he had bought a similar house back then he would have being paying about $2,000 a month in mortgage and property tax. By now he would have paid a chunk off his mortgage and, even if the market crashed by 50% tomorrow, the house would still be worth more than he paid for it.

I agree there is no law that says house prices must go up, the only law is of supply and demand. With the US economy starting to recover the BC economy is expected to grow strongly in 2014. There are still lots of people who want to move to south west BC and they are not making any new land. If I owned a multi-million dollar house on the Westside I would be concerned. However, I just don't see a significant long-term fall in demand for the kind of homes ordinary people buy and live in.

ExKiwilass Sep 24th 2013 7:58 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by JonboyE (Post 10916215)
It reminds me of someone I met in 2001 and still see now and again at social gatherings. At the time he was renting a home in South Surrey. He said he didn't want to buy because he thought the market was overpriced and he was waiting for it to cool off. To be fair to him prices had been increasing steadily for two years.

He is still renting and paying $4,000 a month. If he had bought a similar house back then he would have being paying about $2,000 a month in mortgage and property tax. By now he would have paid a chunk off his mortgage and, even if the market crashed by 50% tomorrow, the house would still be worth more than he paid for it.

I agree there is no law that says house prices must go up, the only law is of supply and demand. With the US economy starting to recover the BC economy is expected to grow strongly in 2014. There are still lots of people who want to move to south west BC and they are not making any new land. If I owned a multi-million dollar house on the Westside I would be concerned. However, I just don't see a significant long-term fall in demand for the kind of homes ordinary people buy and live in.

we have friends like that too. They were convinced of the crash back in '03, and they are still renting.

The4BellsLondon Sep 24th 2013 9:46 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by Mike Gas (Post 10914957)
Was talking to a Realtor a few weeks ago who is one of the top earners in Vancouver and he is suggesting of record that the market is heading for a massive fall and he was making the best of it before the bubble bursts and he has a few lean years.
So be careful if your thinking in buying now.

Top earning realtor ... Lean years ... Seems an oxymoron to me ... It's be rising since we arrived in 08 and I can't see any reason for it to crash ATM .

Mike Gas Sep 24th 2013 9:33 pm

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by The4BellsLondon (Post 10916340)
Top earning realtor ... Lean years ... Seems an oxymoron to me ... It's be rising since we arrived in 08 and I can't see any reason for it to crash ATM .

Matter of time have listened to comments similar to those above before every housing crash in the UK

Moreover, average house prices are now 12 times personal disposable income, way above historical averages. This ratio reached 9.7 times in the last housing bubble in the late 1980s. As a result, household debt as a per cent of disposable income has risen to over 153 per cent in Canada, reaching record levels and coming close to the levels that the U.S. reached before the housing crash.

In economics, it all comes down to demand vs. supply. Canada has a significant excess supply of housing that sooner or later will have to be reflected in lower prices. Toronto, for example, is at the top of the world when it comes to the number of condo buildings under construction.
Canada’s high house prices in relation to incomes, combined with record household debt levels and overinvestment in residential construction, combined with a slowdown in demand, will cause a severe correction in the real estate market. This time it is not different. It never is.

Source
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe...article549440/

Shard Sep 24th 2013 9:49 pm

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by Mike Gas (Post 10916997)
Matter of time have listened to comments similar to those above before every housing crash in the UK


Source
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe...article549440/

It's a good article. I think the relatively unique factor in Canada's hot housing markets (Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto) is the constant stream of foreign money underpinning demand. Both as investment from overseas and as a result of immigration. Canada is a safe haven politically as well as economically so as long as the condo market continues to attract investment the housing market should avoid a crash. IMO. As ExKiwi says, no one actually knows! Especially the realtors, they're the last ones to know.

The4BellsLondon Sep 25th 2013 3:59 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by Mike Gas (Post 10916997)
Matter of time have listened to comments similar to those above before every housing crash in the UK

Moreover, average house prices are now 12 times personal disposable income, way above historical averages. This ratio reached 9.7 times in the last housing bubble in the late 1980s. As a result, household debt as a per cent of disposable income has risen to over 153 per cent in Canada, reaching record levels and coming close to the levels that the U.S. reached before the housing crash.

In economics, it all comes down to demand vs. supply. Canada has a significant excess supply of housing that sooner or later will have to be reflected in lower prices. Toronto, for example, is at the top of the world when it comes to the number of condo buildings under construction.
Canada’s high house prices in relation to incomes, combined with record household debt levels and overinvestment in residential construction, combined with a slowdown in demand, will cause a severe correction in the real estate market. This time it is not different. It never is.

Source
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe...article549440/



Indeed .. But demand exceeds supply here And we don't have the excess land or physical space within the GVA to build on ..condo heights are also restricted within COV. Plus the money from Asia keeps jacking up prices for those properties that are available .. When people come in as cash buyers and offer eel over listing price.

ExKiwilass Sep 25th 2013 4:27 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 
from my realtor friend i hear it's still mulitple offers on houses in East Van.

The4BellsLondon Sep 25th 2013 5:21 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by ExKiwilass (Post 10917634)
from my realtor friend i hear it's still mulitple offers on houses in East Van.

Yup .. Still getting regular approaches (?) from realtors and just notes in door from people wanting to buy in area.

The4BellsLondon Sep 26th 2013 3:17 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 
http://www.vancitybuzz.com/2013/09/5...e-transaction/

$55 million for a condo !

Shard Sep 26th 2013 3:22 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by The4BellsLondon (Post 10919201)

The buyer should have used his/her money to buy something more impressive...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-24271487

dbd33 Sep 26th 2013 3:22 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by The4BellsLondon (Post 10919201)

It's not very probable that the buyer paid in cash, as claimed, though it is an amusing image.

The4BellsLondon Sep 26th 2013 6:05 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by dbd33 (Post 10919206)
It's not very probable that the buyer paid in cash, as claimed, though it is an amusing image.

Yeah.. They should have had a pic with all the wonga! I suppose a wire transfer of full amount .. No mortgage..Counts as a cash sale?

dbd33 Sep 26th 2013 6:33 am

Re: Vancouver RE: update
 

Originally Posted by The4BellsLondon (Post 10919391)
Yeah.. They should have had a pic with all the wonga! I suppose a wire transfer of full amount .. No mortgage..Counts as a cash sale?

Yeah, most things count in real estate adverts.


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 8:08 am.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.