![]() |
Re: Quick question re. purchasing laptops
Originally Posted by Hawk13
(Post 10050821)
I thought we were talking about personal use and $300 to $400 buck laptops? I know that the PC laptop that I'm on that my crack IT team purchased cost just a little bit more than that.
And they even installed third party anti-virus software. |
Re: Quick question re. purchasing laptops
Originally Posted by MikeUK
(Post 10050797)
The point is that a windoze pc and a Mac have very little significant difference today other than price..
What you are talking about is historical difference that no longer apply, differences propagated by Apple media team in order to justify significantly inflated prices.. Do you really think an IT department would lease cheap but high maintenance machines in the modern world …. |
Re: Quick question re. purchasing laptops
I have two laptops- one provided from my employer, and one I use for random surfing etc. I also have an iMac (as mentioned earlier- I bought it 5 years ago).
Never had ANY issues with my mac. Both my laptops are under 12 months old- one crashes regularly, and the other is already showing signs of age- slowing down, etc. The cynics will say it's all Apple PR, sheep-like following, etc etc, but the reality is that in my experience (and seemingly others on here who also own a Mac), is that their performance for day to day use, and longevity, far exceeds that of a regular PC or laptop. The chances are, those saying PC's are as good as macs probably only own a PC. |
Re: Quick question re. purchasing laptops
Originally Posted by jericho
(Post 10050971)
I have two laptops- one provided from my employer, and one I use for random surfing etc. I also have an iMac (as mentioned earlier- I bought it 5 years ago).
Never had ANY issues with my mac. Both my laptops are under 12 months old- one crashes regularly, and the other is already showing signs of age- slowing down, etc. The cynics will say it's all Apple PR, sheep-like following, etc etc, but the reality is that in my experience (and seemingly others on here who also own a Mac), is that their performance for day to day use, and longevity, far exceeds that of a regular PC or laptop. The chances are, those saying PC's are as good as macs probably only own a PC. |
Re: Quick question re. purchasing laptops
Originally Posted by chrisbrockhurst
(Post 10050983)
and never will own a Mac because they dont believe us haha
Have owned an Mac PowerPC8100..... Been there seen the hype... know my hardware and software.... Wouldn't spend the money !!! not for an Apple branded *nix clone on PC hardware... sorry but that's all you have |
Re: Quick question re. purchasing laptops
Originally Posted by chrisbrockhurst
(Post 10048179)
jumping in a bit late now but I believe Apple has a pricing structure in place to make their products the same price throughout the world. There might be little differences with exchange rates fluctuating and tax prices (i.e if you buy tax free etc) but most of the time you will find products the same.
|
Re: Quick question re. purchasing laptops
Originally Posted by Hawk13
(Post 10050821)
I thought we were talking about personal use and $300 to $400 buck laptops? I know that the PC laptop that I'm on that my crack IT team purchased cost just a little bit more than that.
And they even installed third party anti-virus software. |
Re: Quick question re. purchasing laptops
Originally Posted by jericho
(Post 10050971)
Both my laptops are under 12 months old- one crashes regularly, and the other is already showing signs of age- slowing down, etc.
The cynics will say it's all Apple PR, sheep-like following, etc etc, but the reality is that in my experience (and seemingly others on here who also own a Mac), is that their performance for day to day use, and longevity, far exceeds that of a regular PC or laptop. The chances are, those saying PC's are as good as macs probably only own a PC. As for my experience, I work in IT, deal with all kinds of different makes including Apple. From a hardware perspective there is little to choose between an Apple and say, a Dell, in fact the laptops are both made by Foxconn. From an OS perspective it depends, generally speaking (very generally speaking) you may have more problems with Windows but the problems are easier to resolve because more people know how to fix them. With Apple you have less problems because they use a bespoke hardware configuration so by definition the OS will have less to deal with - but if you have a problem it's a nightmare to get it resolved. I remember one Mac a couple of years ago that just randomly froze in Safari, but not in Firefox. Apple were absolutely no help getting it fixed. In fact it never did get fixed. |
Re: Quick question re. purchasing laptops
Originally Posted by MikeUK
(Post 10050797)
Do you really think an IT department would lease cheap but high maintenance machines in the modern world ….
I often have this come up in meetings, "oooh, can't we use Macs" which is always deep-sixed by (a) pointing out that x piece of software vital to the operation of the business doesn't work on it (often Microsoft Access) and (b) having a Mac with Windows on it or showing a video of Windows running on a Mac. Then they understand all they're buying are overpriced PCs. A lot of Apple stuff is better than the competition, good example being iPhones and a daresay many non-IT experts will get along better with the Apple OS for typical home use but generally speaking in the business world, Macs make no sense. I'm not an Apple hater, but money is money. |
Re: Quick question re. purchasing laptops
I know bugger all about computers, so i use a PS3 for gaming, an iPad HD for surfing the web, reading, etc, and use a Lenovo laptop for work. For work i have an option of a Lenovo or a Mac. I chose the Lenovo because the IT support is there and you're on your own with the Mac (this is with a huge IT company as well).
If i didn't need a laptop for working at home, i'd not bother owning one. I'd stick with the iPad and the PS3. :thumbup: I recently bought my mum a new iPad since she wanted to replace her old knackered laptop. She find it MUCH easier to use for what she needs :D |
Re: Quick question re. purchasing laptops
I work in IT and use HP laptops for work and have a MacBook Pro for home use.
As Steve_ said the reason that you get less malware on a Mac/OSX is because historically it has been less popular so malicious coders have been going after the biggest audience. This will change in the future so it is important to use AV and practice safe browsing. I have not had an issue with malware on my Mac because I don't go to dodgy sites on it and don't open unknown files and keep my Java, Flash etc up-to-date which helps protect against drive-by attacks. For example a legitimate site serving malicious content through an advertisement you happen to hover over. Malware is very highly dependent on user susceptibility and is best tackled by user education. Having said that I do find the MacBook a joy to use. It is really nice hardware - the unibody design is solid and the keyboard is lovely. I would compare it to driving an Acura over a Honda - mostly the same thing but it just feels that bit nicer and yes has the label prestige lol. |
Re: Quick question re. purchasing laptops
Originally Posted by Steve_
(Post 10053025)
I'm not an Apple hater, but money is money.
IMHO Windows 7 is a good OS, and much better value than OSx |
Re: Quick question re. purchasing laptops
Originally Posted by MikeUK
(Post 10053176)
I'm not a fan of windows, but I'm much less a fan of Apple Technology based purely on what they charge for what you get...
IMHO Windows 7 is a good OS, and much better value than OSx Many people like to drive a Kia. Others prefers something a bit more expensive, even if it does the same job. Nowt wrong with either. |
Re: Quick question re. purchasing laptops
Goodness, who'd have thought my little enquiry would spark such a discussion ;)
|
Re: Quick question re. purchasing laptops
Originally Posted by jericho
(Post 10053356)
Each to their own.
Many people like to drive a Kia. Others prefers something a bit more expensive, even if it does the same job. Nowt wrong with either. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 1:34 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.