![]() |
Re: French Emersion
I hate the way the French dip those stale cakes into coffee. Disgusting.
|
Re: French Emersion
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 8334313)
I hate the way the French dip those stale cakes into coffee. Disgusting.
But then what would I know.;) |
Re: French Emersion
Originally Posted by Steve_P
(Post 8334317)
I thought that was the Italians?:confused:
But then what would I know.;) |
Re: French Emersion
Originally Posted by Steve_P
(Post 8334317)
I thought that was the Italians?:confused:
But then what would I know.;) But then, what would I know? <another one for the oinki?> |
Re: French Emersion
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 8334349)
Oh no, it's them French, it sets them to churning out volumes.
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 8334354)
Actually, I think it's the British.
But then, what would I know? <another one for the oinki?> I was thinking of biscotti as the stale cakes. Oops.:blink: |
Re: French Emersion
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8334296)
No one is suggesting changing any rules to suit any immigrant. All I have done is make an observation as to why the present situation exists.
"Why would the attention seeker leave the party especially when someone else is buying the drinks?" I assumed you to be an immigrant. A gatecrasher or friend of an invitee, to continue your analogy, one who seeks to give host the heave-ho. |
Re: French Emersion
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 8334349)
Oh no, it's them French, it sets them to churning out volumes.
Originally Posted by Steve_P
(Post 8334365)
In new speak, my bad. :p
I was thinking of biscotti as the stale cakes. Oops.:blink: I thought he was talking about ginger snaps, not madelaines. |
Re: French Emersion
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 8334367)
Ah, I took this to be a suggestion that the francophone cradles might want to leave their country:
"Why would the attention seeker leave the party especially when someone else is buying the drinks?" I assumed you to be an immigrant. A gatecrasher or friend of an invitee, to continue your analogy, one who seeks to give host the heave-ho. I wouldn't particularly wish the attention seeker to leave as they do add a bit of interest to the party which can otherwise be a little bland but on the other hand there is a limit to how many drinks the other members are prepared to pay for. |
Re: French Emersion
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8334436)
Not at all. It's not a suggestion to separate but a rational explanation why separation has not occured despite the member of the club taking about it a lot and claiming they don't get enough recognition of their specialness.
I wouldn't particularly wish the attention seeker to leave as they do add a bit of interest to the party which can otherwise be a little bland but on the other hand there is a limit to how many drinks the other members are prepared to pay for. It should be French emergence. |
Re: French Emersion
Originally Posted by Kiwilass
(Post 8333774)
It's ridculous that they require bilingualism for government jobs in this province. For what? The microscopic francophone community?
As of this morning, the Federal Government website shows 44 job listings in BC. Of those, 26 appear to have a requirement for bilingualism. On closer inspection, they are general ads covering openings across Canada. Where BC is mentioned specifically in the job specification, the need for bilingualism disappears. I can only find one job in that list that is BC-specific and requires bilingualism. It looks tourism-related, so that would not be unreasonable. The level of proficiency it calls for, in both languages, is so low that I would be surprised if anyone meeting the criteria would be able to read the advert. I didn't read through all the DND postings. A number of them would likely require bilingualism regardless of location, for operational reasons. Try going into a Federal Government office in Vancouver, say Industry Canada, and asking how many of the staff are bilingual. Or go into a Canada Post outlet and asked to be served in French. It's your right. |
Re: French Emersion
damn... once again, I come late to a good debate.
My position is somewhat similar to Iaink's, I think. My eldest started this year in Ontario's FI at grade 1. Both his mother and I speak some French - mine limited, rusty, and Parisian, hers not far from fluent and learnt in English school in Montreal. The local school board's FI system has half-day split English/French tuition, with half a day in each language. Subjects taught in French include science, social sciences, and phys ed; mathematics and arts (music, etc) are taught in English. Language arts are obviously taught in their respective languages. So far, he seems to be thriving. As to whether there is a cachet or snobbery about the FI program - I don't believe there is, but there is certainly a sort of semi-officially acknowledged academic streaming at work. The school board's own published criteria for parents considering whether to put their kids in FI at grade 1 include this: How do I know if French Immersion is appropriate for my child? Children who may find the program appropriate- - Handle new situations using positive coping strategies (e.g.: risk-taker, gets along with peers, confident, with positive self-esteem. - Demonstrate curiosity and a willingness to explore and experiment. - Listen effectively (can retell or explain a story or events in proper sequence. - Play with language (enjoys rhyming, memory and games. - Enjoy new words (repeats and uses new vocabulary appropriately. - Have well established work habits. - Have a successful kindergarten year. - Exhibit appropriate first language development. Children who may find the program challenging: - Perform below average in his/her own first language. - Have parents who don't equally support enrolment and/or the student does not want to be in the program. - Find their kindergarten experience challenging emotionally. - Experience difficulty staying on task. - Have weak listening skills. - Experience difficulty retaining information. His school is FI-only, the board here has, as far as possible, physically separated the FI from the English track. I have heard that this was primarily in response to criticism that the English-track and FI-track kids did not get on in the playground in schools where there were parallel tracks running. |
Re: French Emersion
Hi everyone,
I'm going to throw a spanner in the works here, actually I think regarding 'french immersion' it should really be called 'Quebecois immersion'.:) |
Re: French Emersion
Didnt we do this already:rolleyes::zzz:
|
Re: French Emersion
Originally Posted by greentea3
(Post 8405018)
Hi everyone,
I'm going to throw a spanner in the works here, actually I think regarding 'french immersion' it should really be called 'Quebecois immersion'.:) |
Re: French Emersion
Originally Posted by greentea3
(Post 8405018)
Hi everyone,
I'm going to throw a spanner in the works here, actually I think regarding 'french immersion' it should really be called 'Quebecois immersion'.:) We recently enrolled our son to JK - we decided to go with a Catholic English school, despite the best school in the area being FI and closer (literally at the top of our road). We did this because we feel he is slightly behind for his age with regard to English - we will see how he progresses and may change our mind when he gets to start Grade 1. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 2:07 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.