So who's voting below the line ?
... I wanted to, but hell, that's a LOT of boxes. I doubt the true independents are going to get much love in this election, since voting below the line is the only way they get anything.
http://i.imgur.com/dSTWC3Ll.jpg |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by GarryP
(Post 11976784)
... I wanted to, but hell, that's a LOT of boxes. I doubt the true independents are going to get much love in this election, since voting below the line is the only way they get anything.
http://i.imgur.com/dSTWC3Ll.jpg Doing ours as I type as we're away on Polling Day |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by Dreamy
(Post 11977216)
Of course, they've changed the way the Senate vote is done, probably to encourage more people to vote below the line. Picking 12 below the line isn't so onerous... although I know several people who will still be numbering every box.
Doing ours as I type as we're away on Polling Day As and when I find a workable DIY how to vote card generator, I'll post it here. |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by GarryP
(Post 11977227)
You could vote for nothing but greens and still hit 12 below the line. Practically, even after you exclude the loonies, you are probably still looking at 35+ numbered to ensure your vote doesn't exhaust.
As and when I find a workable DIY how to vote card generator, I'll post it here. |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by Dreamy
(Post 11977216)
Of course, they've changed the way the Senate vote is done, probably to encourage more people to vote below the line. Picking 12 below the line isn't so onerous... although I know several people who will still be numbering every box.
Doing ours as I type as we're away on Polling Day |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by moneypenny20
(Post 11978210)
:rofl: Does MrDreamy know who he's voted for?
|
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
I had a look at the One Nation website yesterday to have look at where the are at policy wise these days. I always thought Pauline was a bit of a loon in the past, but I have to say that their once extreme policies have been softened somewhat, and I actually agree with quite a lot of their current policies.
|
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by spuddyo
(Post 11978795)
I had a look at the One Nation website yesterday to have look at where the are at policy wise these days. I always thought Pauline was a bit of a loon in the past, but I have to say that their once extreme policies have been softened somewhat, and I actually agree with quite a lot of their current policies.
Islam - Policy | Pauline Hanson's One Nation Carefully crafted, probably a few hard core policies there, but it certainly raises some interesting points. The mutilation of genitalia is probably spot on. |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11978835)
Interesting. Just had a quick browse myself. The obvious choice was to go straight for the stance on Islam.
Islam - Policy | Pauline Hanson's One Nation Carefully crafted, probably a few hard core policies there, but it certainly raises some interesting points. The mutilation of genitalia is probably spot on. Is it too late to organise a Postal Vote? S |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by Swerv-o
(Post 11978866)
Is it too late to organise a Postal Vote?
S Postal vote - Australian Electoral Commission |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
When Joe Hockey was the LNP member for my electorate, no-one was campaigning in my area. Not even Cockey himself. Now it's Trent Zimmerman, he is the only one campaigning. Maybe so many electorates won't be so nailed on if opposing candidates got out and campained.
|
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by knockoff nige
(Post 11978888)
When Joe Hockey was the LNP member for my electorate, no-one was campaigning in my area. Not even Cockey himself. Now it's Trent Zimmerman, he is the only one campaigning. Maybe so many electorates won't be so nailed on if opposing candidates got out and campained.
Saying that, I've received exactly one mailing here as well - so the money is going elsewhere (those few swing electorates). |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by GarryP
(Post 11978897)
North Melbourne (my, haven't we got some money) is about as safe a LNP seat as you'll find. Thus your vote doesn't really count. You could vote Greens till you are blue in the face - nothing will change. So nobody is really going to put any effort into it - they'd rather spend the money elsewhere.
Saying that, I've received exactly one mailing here as well - so the money is going elsewhere (those few swing electorates). I don't think that Nige lives in North Melbourne... S |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by Swerv-o
(Post 11978903)
I don't think that Nige lives in North Melbourne...
S |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by Swerv-o
(Post 11978903)
I don't think that Nige lives in North Melbourne...
S Yep, it should have been North Sydney. |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by GarryP
(Post 11978923)
Oops, I gave him an upgrade.
Yep, it should have been North Sydney. Melbourne, Sydney, it's all the same in the end... S |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by knockoff nige
(Post 11978920)
Yeah North Sydney is bad enough.
|
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11978941)
You'll need to move to Bankstown if you want your vote heard.
I don't think I'll be voting for any of the major parties. S |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by Swerv-o
(Post 11978943)
Yeah, I live in Plibersek's very safe Labour seat - my vot will make little difference, beyond giving some of the smaller parties a boost.
I don't think I'll be voting for any of the major parties. |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by GarryP
(Post 11978949)
You can get one of the independents election money next time if you can help push their primary support over 4%.
I actually quite like many of the policies of the Sex Party, however they have a huge branding issue, and will never appeal to the larger population. I would probably vote NXT, if he was running anybody in my electorate. S |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11978941)
You'll need to move to Bankstown if you want your vote heard.
|
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by Swerv-o
(Post 11978951)
I actually quite like many of the policies of the Sex Party, however they have a huge branding issue, and will never appeal to the larger population.
I would probably vote NXT, if he was running anybody in my electorate. S |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by Swerv-o
(Post 11978943)
Yeah, I live in Plibersek's very safe Labour seat - my vot will make little difference, beyond giving some of the smaller parties a boost.
I don't think I'll be voting for any of the major parties. S |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11978963)
I live in Malcolm T's very safe Liberal seat. There's Labor placards on all the street posts around his office which gives me a giggle everytime I pass it.
|
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by bcworld
(Post 11978968)
I think demographically Wentworth is probably a lot like Higgins ("blue ribbon") here in Melbourne where according to polling Kelly O'Dwyer is at risk from the Greens. Malcolm could end up in a similar predicament by the next election I think. His 2PP vote was in the low to mid-50s% in 2004 & 2007.
I heard recently that the most common language spoken in households after English is Russian. Here is the Labor candidate. Interesting fella http://www.news.com.au/national/federal-election/federal-election-2016-is-westie-hater-evan-hughes-labors-worst-candidate-yet/news-story/c1df6112525a6ada0a4f8f5f0e1148ad |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by knockoff nige
(Post 11978956)
Or Warringah. I hear that one is up for grabs this time.
|
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11978975)
White middle class. Not a chance.
And the sheer explosion of schadenfreude should he get kicked out would be a delight to see. |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by GarryP
(Post 11978989)
Not easy, but two thirds of his electorate said he shouldn't be standing again.
And the sheer explosion of schadenfreude should he get kicked out would be a delight to see. "We've stopped the boats" ........ no you stopped thousands of deaths at sea. |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11978993)
"We've stopped the boats" ........ no you stopped thousands of deaths at sea.
|
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by GarryP
(Post 11978994)
"We've stopped the brown people ........ I mean boats"
|
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
If you start attacking halal certification, then you need to also look at kosher. Extremist Jews with their repressive laws for women, and their racist viewpoints should not then have a place in society- nor should circumcision for religious reasons. Where do you draw the line? Catholics? Scientologists? Jehovas witnesses? Hillsong? Evangelists? Anyone who has a tint of brown skin??
|
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11979008)
Some were black. But if you want to racially profile and colour code people, go ahead. I won't be partaking.
|
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by carolinephillips
(Post 11979072)
If you start attacking halal certification, then you need to also look at kosher. Extremist Jews with their repressive laws for women, and their racist viewpoints should not then have a place in society- nor should circumcision for religious reasons. Where do you draw the line? Catholics? Scientologists? Jehovas witnesses? Hillsong? Evangelists? Anyone who has a tint of brown skin??
You make a very good point. The zealous nature of extreme judaism seems immune to criticism however. S |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by GarryP
(Post 11979073)
No need, simply pointing out the subtext to what Abbott was thinking/doing, and why it was 'stop the boats' rather than 'save from drowning'.
|
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by carolinephillips
(Post 11979072)
If you start attacking halal certification, then you need to also look at kosher. Extremist Jews with their repressive laws for women, and their racist viewpoints should not then have a place in society- nor should circumcision for religious reasons. Where do you draw the line? Catholics? Scientologists? Jehovas witnesses? Hillsong? Evangelists? Anyone who has a tint of brown skin??
|
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Details on electorate, polling places, and the existence or otherwise of sausage sizzles (updated as we get closer) can be found from Google :
https://election.google.com.au |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by GarryP
(Post 11980109)
Details on electorate, polling places, and the existence or otherwise of sausage sizzles (updated as we get closer) can be found from Google :
https://election.google.com.au Luckily I'll be away that weekend, so postal vote for me... S |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11978993)
Good decisions ....... poorly explained.
"We've stopped the boats" ........ no you stopped thousands of deaths at sea. An impressive example of the destruction caused by socialism |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by Amazulu
(Post 11980397)
The change for change's sake election of Australia-hating Kevin Rudd in 2007 resulted in over 50000 illegal arrivals by boat and about 2000 deaths at sea
An impressive example of the destruction caused by socialism |
Re: So who's voting below the line ?
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11980463)
How wrong you could be. Australia hates brown people. Didn't you catch the memo.
There were plenty of, er, brown people going about their business None of them looked scared, oppressed, hated - in fact some of them were walking, talking, laughing and joking with actual white people Surely that's not right and I was seeing things? Definitely missed the memo |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:29 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.