Scientific research
#2
Originally Posted by Bix
Please humour me and answer honestly.
Gut feeling answers.
Gut feeling answers.
#3
I voted no.In the Principal of Least Action, the differential equations of motion of a given physical system are derived by minimizing the action of the system in question. For a finite system of objects, the action S is an integral over time of a function called the Lagrange function or Lagrangian L(q, dq/dt), which depends on the set of generalized coordinates and velocities (q, dq/dt) of the system in question.
#4
Originally Posted by Britishaussie
I put yes but wasn't sure what type of scientific research you're referring to. I'm against testing cosmetics on animals but if it's for medical research purposes to prevent/cure diseases like cancer then it has its place. As for general scientific research, it covers such a broad spectrum it's practically impossible to disagree with it. Unless I'm missing something ...?
Im with you on that one, answered yes but would have preferred more of an explanation about the scientific research
Mandy
#5
Originally Posted by Britishaussie
I put yes but wasn't sure what type of scientific research you're referring to. I'm against testing cosmetics on animals but if it's for medical research purposes to prevent/cure diseases like cancer then it has its place. As for general scientific research, it covers such a broad spectrum it's practically impossible to disagree with it. Unless I'm missing something ...?
However this is just me doing some of my own scientific research....maybe that's the wrong expression for it.........um........let's just call it fact gathering.
It's not a yes or no to anything in particular.
Please vote people.
#6
Originally Posted by Hutch
I voted no.In the Principal of Least Action, the differential equations of motion of a given physical system are derived by minimizing the action of the system in question. For a finite system of objects, the action S is an integral over time of a function called the Lagrange function or Lagrangian L(q, dq/dt), which depends on the set of generalized coordinates and velocities (q, dq/dt) of the system in question.
Say what hutch, you baffled me with science than
Mandy
#7
I'm presuming this is your own personal scientific research...
I am generally optimistic and don't like to miss out on a freebie - so I've answered in the affirmative..
However, if you really want my response to if I agree with scientific research - it's far too late on a Sat night to THINK..
I am generally optimistic and don't like to miss out on a freebie - so I've answered in the affirmative..

However, if you really want my response to if I agree with scientific research - it's far too late on a Sat night to THINK..
#9
Oh definitely Yes.
Actually, thinking about it, No.
But then again.......... Yes.
Actually, thinking about it, No.
But then again.......... Yes.
#10
Originally Posted by Bix
Please humour me and answer honestly.
Gut feeling answers.
Gut feeling answers.
#11
Originally Posted by geordie mandy
Say what hutch, you baffled me with science than
Mandy
Mandy
#12
Originally Posted by Hutch
Baffled me too missus - was just a cut and paste from a site on string theory, lol


Well, they are something different here.
#13
Originally Posted by Hutch
Baffled me too missus - was just a cut and paste from a site on string theory, lol


thats ok then
Mandy
#14
Account Closed










Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 29,154

I answered yes, as tend to be more positive than negative....simple as..
So what's it all about..owt or nowt?
So what's it all about..owt or nowt?
#15
Account Closed









Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,235

A definate NO bloody way!!!!
Just cause I felt like it.....
But then, I may change my mind
What do I do then???
It'll be too late!!
Just cause I felt like it.....
But then, I may change my mind
What do I do then???
It'll be too late!!











