Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Australia > The Barbie
Reload this Page >

Rudd's Internet Censorship

Rudd's Internet Censorship

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 22nd 2008, 12:08 am
  #46  
No Clean Feed
 
bigAPE's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Hampton, Victoria
Posts: 1,381
bigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Rudd's Internet Censorship

Originally Posted by NedKelly
What's a dunder-muffin?


See above... your tax dollars at work

Last edited by bigAPE; Dec 22nd 2008 at 12:18 am.
bigAPE is offline  
Old Dec 22nd 2008, 6:25 am
  #47  
22B
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 534
22B has a brilliant future22B has a brilliant future22B has a brilliant future22B has a brilliant future22B has a brilliant future22B has a brilliant future22B has a brilliant future
Default Re: Rudd's Internet Censorship

Originally Posted by bigAPE
What a wanker... frankly, there are amoeba out there with more intelligence than this dunder-muffin.

Even someone with a basic understanding of peering protocols and encryption knows that Deep Packet Inspection can easily be circumvented by strong bi-directional encryption and changing the default ports. CopyRouter, which is the software CONroy is talking about, could possibly defeat Gnutella based networks like Limewire but not BitTorrent, which most people use. I guess no-one at Brilliant Digital Entertainment mentioned that to him that it fails to scrape CRC's from swarm based peering technologies.

This is such a staggering waste of tax payers money and all so that Conroy doesn't lose any more face after promoting this preposterous plan so vigorously. Only a couple of the major ISPs are involved in this idiotic trial and they hve made it very clear they are only taking part to ensure that the true scale of its stupidity is sung from mountain tops.

God it makes me want to piss blood just thinking that some people out there actually support this moron.
Oh come on now - tell us what you really think...
22B is offline  
Old Dec 22nd 2008, 6:57 am
  #48  
No Clean Feed
 
bigAPE's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Hampton, Victoria
Posts: 1,381
bigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Rudd's Internet Censorship

Originally Posted by 22B
Oh come on now - tell us what you really think...
I'm not alone

Fatal flaws in website censorship plan, says report
Asher Moses - December 23, 2008

TRIALS of mandatory internet censorship will begin within days despite a secret high-level report to the Rudd Government that found the technology simply does not work, will significantly slow internet speeds and will block access to legitimate websites.

The report, commissioned by the Howard government and prepared by the Internet Industry Association, concluded that schemes to block inappropriate content such as child pornography are fundamentally flawed.

...

Senator Conroy refused to comment directly on why the report has not been released or why the trials are going ahead given its findings.

...

The policy has attracted opposition from online consumers, lobby groups, ISPs, network administrators, some children's welfare groups, the Opposition, the Greens, NSW Young Labor and even the conservative Liberal senator Cory Bernardi, who famously tried to censor the chef Gordon Ramsay's swearing on television.

Professor Landfeldt says the censorship plan assumes websites will remain static, but as soon as the filtering system is in place many porn and other "unwanted" sites will change their designs to get around the filters, just as spammers can bypass email filters.

He said the filtering plan was "completely politicised".

The Greens Senator Scott Ludlam urged the Government to drop its "completely unhinged" policy which was "a waste of taxpayers funds". The Liberal Party's communications spokesman, Nick Minchin, said the Opposition would try to obtain the report under freedom of information laws.
Source: SMH
bigAPE is offline  
Old Dec 28th 2008, 3:00 am
  #49  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
fish.01's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,039
fish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Rudd's Internet Censorship

Originally Posted by MartinLuther
This is like a game of Chinese Whispers (or should that be Chinese Wall Whispers ).
  • The government announces a project to automate the blacklist.
  • A couple of non-government MPs suggest adding euthanasia and anorexia to the list.
  • Web sites like the ones posted by BigApe state that some Government MPs are touting that euthanasia be added to the black list.
  • Some people then start saying euthanasia is on the black list.
  • Some of the same people then say euthanasia is on the list because it's a crime in Aus.
  • Other people then start to say that anything that is a crime will be blocked.
  • etc.
  • etc.

Even if this is technically possible what is most likely to happen? Taking an item off the current black list (detailed instruction in crime) as an example. Yes they will block sites that give details on how to break into a car but they won't block websites reporting or discussing car crime.

If on the off chance euthanasia is added to the list then the likely scenario is that sites offering short stays in Swiss hospitals will be banned. It is extremely unlikely that the discussion of euthanasia will be banned especially if the discussion is political (which is protected by the High Court) and it is improbable that animal euthanasia is blocked. (The reason the filter is being tested is to check if it will affect legitimate pages.)

I think some chill pills are in order Although I'm not allowed by the black list to give you details on how to make them
Sure, so discussion on euthanasia may not be banned now...but what is to stop non political discussion on euthanasia being blocked in the future by a less moral government (like the one we just booted). It would be easy to claim it is illegal so is legitimately blocked.

The worst problem with this is that overseas books, films and games are republished here so have a local advocate. If censorship is over the top they are informed and can appeal the ruling, taking it to the media if necessary. Each overseas website that may be banned doesn't have that advocacy. It just disappears, without the overseas publishers knowing, or even caring, that the Australian government may have unfairly censored material. This is a fundamental difference that will allow the censorship to creep into unbalance. We will not even know it existed and was censored.

Lets face it. A lot of things that are legal today were illegal previously. And illegal things today will become legal tomorrow. This change comes through discussion. If discussion is censored then legitimate change will be stifled.

As an atheist I do not want a conservative Catholic like Stephen Conroy pushing his views onto me through legislation. We have a separation of church and state.
fish.01 is offline  
Old Dec 28th 2008, 6:29 am
  #50  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,316
MartinLuther is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Rudd's Internet Censorship

Originally Posted by fish.01
Sure, so discussion on euthanasia may not be banned now...but what is to stop non political discussion on euthanasia being blocked in the future by a less moral government (like the one we just booted). It would be easy to claim it is illegal so is legitimately blocked.

The worst problem with this is that overseas books, films and games are republished here so have a local advocate. If censorship is over the top they are informed and can appeal the ruling, taking it to the media if necessary. Each overseas website that may be banned doesn't have that advocacy. It just disappears, without the overseas publishers knowing, or even caring, that the Australian government may have unfairly censored material. This is a fundamental difference that will allow the censorship to creep into unbalance. We will not even know it existed and was censored.

Lets face it. A lot of things that are legal today were illegal previously. And illegal things today will become legal tomorrow. This change comes through discussion. If discussion is censored then legitimate change will be stifled.

As an atheist I do not want a conservative Catholic like Stephen Conroy pushing his views onto me through legislation. We have a separation of church and state.
Democracy is the answer. Aus is a very democratic country and has a secular government. Political discussion (freedom of speech on political matters) is protected by the High Court.

The changes you mention in paragraph 3 have come through democratic government. I can't see this government reversing the trend of the last 50 odd years.
MartinLuther is offline  
Old Jan 4th 2009, 1:46 pm
  #51  
Home and Happy
 
Pollyana's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Keep true friends and puppets close, trust no-one else...
Posts: 93,849
Pollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Rudd's Internet Censorship

Originally Posted by MartinLuther
Democracy is the answer. Aus is a very democratic country and has a secular government. Political discussion (freedom of speech on political matters) is protected by the High Court.

The changes you mention in paragraph 3 have come through democratic government. I can't see this government reversing the trend of the last 50 odd years.
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/s...77-952,00.html

Sex education and cartoon websites have been deemed too risque for Brisbane City Council workers, while Queensland Transport employees are not allowed to view weather pages, which are deemed as entertainment.

Queensland police were denied access to the official Olympic Games site last year; food manufacturer Harvest Freshcuts restricts employees' internet access to online banking sites; and Queensland Health staff find it easier to fax urgent reports than wait for the approval to email material with medical terminology or images.


Most Qld Govt departments block access to all blogs and forums - including BE.
Pollyana is offline  
Old Jan 4th 2009, 2:00 pm
  #52  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,316
MartinLuther is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Rudd's Internet Censorship

Originally Posted by Pollyana
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/s...77-952,00.html

Sex education and cartoon websites have been deemed too risque for Brisbane City Council workers, while Queensland Transport employees are not allowed to view weather pages, which are deemed as entertainment.

Queensland police were denied access to the official Olympic Games site last year; food manufacturer Harvest Freshcuts restricts employees' internet access to online banking sites; and Queensland Health staff find it easier to fax urgent reports than wait for the approval to email material with medical terminology or images.


Most Qld Govt departments block access to all blogs and forums - including BE.
Employers banning things is not the same as government banning things. I've never worked for an employer who allowed the employees to view porn. People got sacked if they did.
MartinLuther is offline  
Old Jan 4th 2009, 2:02 pm
  #53  
...giving optimism a go?!
 
DadAgain's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: Brisbane (leafy, hilly western suburbs)
Posts: 2,202
DadAgain has much to be proud ofDadAgain has much to be proud ofDadAgain has much to be proud ofDadAgain has much to be proud ofDadAgain has much to be proud ofDadAgain has much to be proud ofDadAgain has much to be proud ofDadAgain has much to be proud ofDadAgain has much to be proud ofDadAgain has much to be proud ofDadAgain has much to be proud of
Default Re: Rudd's Internet Censorship

Originally Posted by Pollyana
Most Qld Govt departments block access to all blogs and forums - including BE.
..and consequently many of us in a government department I worked in recently had privately owned laptops with wireless internet accounts just to effectively do our jobs!!! (and also to assist with leisure distractions! )
DadAgain is offline  
Old Jan 4th 2009, 5:30 pm
  #54  
Home and Happy
 
Pollyana's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Keep true friends and puppets close, trust no-one else...
Posts: 93,849
Pollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Rudd's Internet Censorship

Originally Posted by MartinLuther
Employers banning things is not the same as government banning things. I've never worked for an employer who allowed the employees to view porn. People got sacked if they did.
If you read the report though you'll see that a lot of sites bsides porn are banned.
For example, Surf Life Saving Qld is a site which is blocked by the Dept of Emergency Services, because they say it is to do with leisure activities - we actually work quite closely with Surf at times so not having access to their site is a big problem.
Dept of Transport are blocked from viewing the Bureau of Met - that one is in the article - which causes no end of issues when trying to deal with road condition reports.
Thats just two that come to mind.

As Dadagain says, it leads to people taking their own laptops to work, and paying for the ir own interent access just so they can do their jobs. One recent project I worked on involved visiting online shopping sites for research into emergency kits. All shopping sites are blocked, so the only way I could do the research was by bringing my own laptop into work, with its own mobile interent connection.
Pollyana is offline  
Old Jan 4th 2009, 6:11 pm
  #55  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,316
MartinLuther is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Rudd's Internet Censorship

Originally Posted by Pollyana
If you read the report though you'll see that a lot of sites bsides porn are banned.
For example, Surf Life Saving Qld is a site which is blocked by the Dept of Emergency Services, because they say it is to do with leisure activities - we actually work quite closely with Surf at times so not having access to their site is a big problem.
Dept of Transport are blocked from viewing the Bureau of Met - that one is in the article - which causes no end of issues when trying to deal with road condition reports.
Thats just two that come to mind.

As Dadagain says, it leads to people taking their own laptops to work, and paying for the ir own interent access just so they can do their jobs. One recent project I worked on involved visiting online shopping sites for research into emergency kits. All shopping sites are blocked, so the only way I could do the research was by bringing my own laptop into work, with its own mobile interent connection.
But these are agencies of the government not the government itself? I know Qld is less democratic than the other states but the rules set out by Qld Government the Employer are not the same as the rules set out by Qld Government the Government. The second bunch are elected the first bunch are not.
MartinLuther is offline  
Old Jan 5th 2009, 7:23 am
  #56  
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
 
NedKelly's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,584
NedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Rudd's Internet Censorship

I came across this quote from a famous author:-

"When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know, the end result is tyranny and oppression no matter how holy the motives."
-- Robert Heinlein
NedKelly is offline  
Old Jan 5th 2009, 8:45 am
  #57  
No Clean Feed
 
bigAPE's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Hampton, Victoria
Posts: 1,381
bigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Rudd's Internet Censorship

Originally Posted by NedKelly
I came across this quote from a famous author:-

"When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know, the end result is tyranny and oppression no matter how holy the motives."
-- Robert Heinlein
He then went on to say:-

"PEeow! PEeow! Ka-Bang... Oh My God! They're coming out of the GROUND !!! ZAP Zaaaaaaap! Ka-BOOOM! "
-- Robert Heinlein


*joke*

Last edited by bigAPE; Jan 5th 2009 at 8:48 am.
bigAPE is offline  
Old Jan 6th 2009, 1:37 pm
  #58  
...giving optimism a go?!
 
DadAgain's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: Brisbane (leafy, hilly western suburbs)
Posts: 2,202
DadAgain has much to be proud ofDadAgain has much to be proud ofDadAgain has much to be proud ofDadAgain has much to be proud ofDadAgain has much to be proud ofDadAgain has much to be proud ofDadAgain has much to be proud ofDadAgain has much to be proud ofDadAgain has much to be proud ofDadAgain has much to be proud ofDadAgain has much to be proud of
Default Re: Rudd's Internet Censorship

Originally Posted by Pollyana
If you read the report though you'll see that a lot of sites bsides porn are banned.
For example, Surf Life Saving Qld is a site which is blocked by the Dept of Emergency Services, because they say it is to do with leisure activities - we actually work quite closely with Surf at times so not having access to their site is a big problem.
Dept of Transport are blocked from viewing the Bureau of Met - that one is in the article - which causes no end of issues when trying to deal with road condition reports.
Thats just two that come to mind.

As Dadagain says, it leads to people taking their own laptops to work, and paying for the ir own interent access just so they can do their jobs. One recent project I worked on involved visiting online shopping sites for research into emergency kits. All shopping sites are blocked, so the only way I could do the research was by bringing my own laptop into work, with its own mobile interent connection.
Funny you mention DES - That was where I was! As software developers working on a java project we found it astoundign that we couldnt get access to 'sourceforge' - or any other the repository for opensource software and its documentation! We couldnt get the manuals for the products we were using!
DadAgain is offline  
Old Jan 6th 2009, 2:24 pm
  #59  
No Clean Feed
 
bigAPE's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Hampton, Victoria
Posts: 1,381
bigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond reputebigAPE has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Rudd's Internet Censorship

Originally Posted by DadAgain
Funny you mention DES - That was where I was! As software developers working on a java project we found it astoundign that we couldnt get access to 'sourceforge' - or any other the repository for opensource software and its documentation! We couldnt get the manuals for the products we were using!
I have the same issue and have came to the conclusion that I couldn't rely on the client to provide the connectivity so I provide my own mobile broadband connection and just recharge it.

Al
bigAPE is offline  
Old Jan 6th 2009, 5:38 pm
  #60  
Home and Happy
 
Pollyana's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Keep true friends and puppets close, trust no-one else...
Posts: 93,849
Pollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Rudd's Internet Censorship

Originally Posted by DadAgain
Funny you mention DES - That was where I was! As software developers working on a java project we found it astoundign that we couldnt get access to 'sourceforge' - or any other the repository for opensource software and its documentation! We couldnt get the manuals for the products we were using!
Some of their filters run in extremely strange ways, and the sites which we are blocked form are extremely strange at times. BE was blocked for ages - I have a suspicion that the access was restored because QAS like to mointor the paramedic threads, but thats just my own theory having seen the forum open on several mangerial screens!
Pollyana is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.