No respect...
#46
Yes, we have logic, we are not stupid, I did not start this thread so people could tell me the obvious. And no, we are not greedy at all, far from it.
I wanted to have a vent over some morons who showed absolutely no respect to our home and our agent let them.
I wanted to have a vent over some morons who showed absolutely no respect to our home and our agent let them.
Last edited by bridie; Jan 23rd 2008 at 10:50 am.
#47
Your house my friend is worth what;
1) Someone is willing to pay for it?
2) Someone is willing to lend money for to pay for it?
3) Someone can earn enough to pay back the money borrowed to pay for it?
You house is worth zilch if all and none of these are true, similar to logic really, i think logic is a term which needs to connect to the property market rather the people's own expectations based on pure and utter speculation and greed?
1) Someone is willing to pay for it?
2) Someone is willing to lend money for to pay for it?
3) Someone can earn enough to pay back the money borrowed to pay for it?
You house is worth zilch if all and none of these are true, similar to logic really, i think logic is a term which needs to connect to the property market rather the people's own expectations based on pure and utter speculation and greed?

#50
Now Now, chill ya beans guys.
Stating the above whilst pertinent, is a tad obvious. Nonetheless true.
However.
1. to be able for people to know what they need to pay for it, you must price it. Thus by pricing/valuing you are giving the potential buyer a benchmark to achieve.
Thats not to say, they are or you are unrealistic, or illogical or greedy. Its the natural course of commerce.
as Ruskin said, it is impossible to get a lot and pay little.
Houses have always been tagged with the must have 99 at end of price or 49, just so they appear cheaper.
Personally, I think... you should get 3 valuations.
Take the total of these valuations, and divide by 3.
Then add 10% to the price, and market it at that for 3 months. This gives you leverage, to barter and to reduce price accordingly.
Ste
1) Someone is willing to pay for it?
2) Someone is willing to lend money for to pay for it?
3) Someone can earn enough to pay back the money borrowed to pay for it?
2) Someone is willing to lend money for to pay for it?
3) Someone can earn enough to pay back the money borrowed to pay for it?
However.
1. to be able for people to know what they need to pay for it, you must price it. Thus by pricing/valuing you are giving the potential buyer a benchmark to achieve.
Thats not to say, they are or you are unrealistic, or illogical or greedy. Its the natural course of commerce.
as Ruskin said, it is impossible to get a lot and pay little.
Houses have always been tagged with the must have 99 at end of price or 49, just so they appear cheaper.
Personally, I think... you should get 3 valuations.
Take the total of these valuations, and divide by 3.
Then add 10% to the price, and market it at that for 3 months. This gives you leverage, to barter and to reduce price accordingly.
Ste
Last edited by Timber Floor Au; Jan 23rd 2008 at 11:02 am.
#51
Banned



Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 177
From: In one big housing bubble!


Well........ what do you expect, making comments towards other members who do understand economics when you have some picture of some bird from up north somewhere, wearing an arse on her shoulders? For god sake put a picture of yourself on there and stop taking the p!ss out of us all?
#52
Well........ what do you expect, making comments towards other members who do understand economics when you have some picture of some bird from up north somewhere, wearing an arse on her shoulders? For god sake put a picture of yourself on there and stop taking the p!ss out of us all?

You can insult me personally all you like, the only person that really looks like an arse metaphorically speaking is staring at you in the mirror.
#53
Come on, play nice. There is no need to start directing hurtful comments towards each other.
Thread closed.
Thread closed.






