Mammograms for ladies in their 30's
#1
Three of us
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 207
Mammograms for ladies in their 30's
Hi,i want to have a mammogram done,is there anywhere in the Northern Beaches where i can have one done without being referred by my GP.Obviously i will have to pay but i dont mind that,thanks
#2
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,289
Re: Mammograms for ladies in their 30's
Phone the helpline number 13 20 50 and ask. (There is free screening for the over 40s, but I am sure if you phone and ask, they will tell you about having it done if under 40 and paying for it. They will tell you where the nearest centre is. And you don't need a GP referal.)
#3
Three of us
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 207
Re: Mammograms for ladies in their 30's
http://www.cancerscreening.gov.au/in...sf/Content/how
Phone the helpline number 13 20 50 and ask. (There is free screening for the over 40s, but I am sure if you phone and ask, they will tell you about having it done if under 40 and paying for it. They will tell you where the nearest centre is. And you don't need a GP referal.)
Phone the helpline number 13 20 50 and ask. (There is free screening for the over 40s, but I am sure if you phone and ask, they will tell you about having it done if under 40 and paying for it. They will tell you where the nearest centre is. And you don't need a GP referal.)
#4
Forum Regular
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Alice Springs NT
Posts: 180
Re: Mammograms for ladies in their 30's
Something to bear in mind is that one of the reasons mammorgrams are not done on younger women is that under 40 or 45 breast normally has a high proportion of glandular tissue, rendering it less suitable for mammography. Another option is high resolution ultrasound. If you have found a lump or you have a strong family history i think you should be able to get these regularly with no problems.
good luck Claire
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mammograms for ladies in their 30's
Even the high resolution ultrasound isn't too expensive after the medicare rebate. About $60.
It may be worth checking that out, rather than the less detailed mammogram, if you are going to have to pay for it. But you would need a Doctors referral for that.
It may be worth checking that out, rather than the less detailed mammogram, if you are going to have to pay for it. But you would need a Doctors referral for that.
#6
Three of us
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 207
Re: Mammograms for ladies in their 30's
Hi Hettie,
Something to bear in mind is that one of the reasons mammorgrams are not done on younger women is that under 40 or 45 breast normally has a high proportion of glandular tissue, rendering it less suitable for mammography. Another option is high resolution ultrasound. If you have found a lump or you have a strong family history i think you should be able to get these regularly with no problems.
good luck Claire
Something to bear in mind is that one of the reasons mammorgrams are not done on younger women is that under 40 or 45 breast normally has a high proportion of glandular tissue, rendering it less suitable for mammography. Another option is high resolution ultrasound. If you have found a lump or you have a strong family history i think you should be able to get these regularly with no problems.
good luck Claire
#7
Forum Regular
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 265
Re: Mammograms for ladies in their 30's
hettie, if you take no other advice this year, I'd urge you to take note of this.
My wife (39), was diagnosed with high grade breast cancer at Xmas. It was 2cm, but she found it herself. The routine Mammograms (family history) didn't pick it up any earlier.
Now these are not my words - but those of an experienced, highly esteemed breast surgeon - "Mammograms are not that effective in catching breast cancer tumors."
In Australia, high risk patients can now get Medicare rebates on MRI's. This has only been brought in over the last few months.
Now again, in the words of my wife's surgeon - "comparing an MRI to a Mammogram is like drawing parallels between a Rolls Royce and a Hyundai". The icing on the cake is that MRI's don't emit the radiation that Mammograms do.
So if you, or any other lady reading this, have any concerns at all, I would strongly urge you to gain peace of mind from the MRI route.
God bless darlin
Big Baz xxxx
My wife (39), was diagnosed with high grade breast cancer at Xmas. It was 2cm, but she found it herself. The routine Mammograms (family history) didn't pick it up any earlier.
Now these are not my words - but those of an experienced, highly esteemed breast surgeon - "Mammograms are not that effective in catching breast cancer tumors."
In Australia, high risk patients can now get Medicare rebates on MRI's. This has only been brought in over the last few months.
Now again, in the words of my wife's surgeon - "comparing an MRI to a Mammogram is like drawing parallels between a Rolls Royce and a Hyundai". The icing on the cake is that MRI's don't emit the radiation that Mammograms do.
So if you, or any other lady reading this, have any concerns at all, I would strongly urge you to gain peace of mind from the MRI route.
God bless darlin
Big Baz xxxx
#8
Re: Mammograms for ladies in their 30's
In Australia, high risk patients can now get Medicare rebates on MRI's. This has only been brought in over the last few months.
Now again, in the words of my wife's surgeon - "comparing an MRI to a Mammogram is like drawing parallels between a Rolls Royce and a Hyundai". The icing on the cake is that MRI's don't emit the radiation that Mammograms do.
So if you, or any other lady reading this, have any concerns at all, I would strongly urge you to gain peace of mind from the MRI route.
What would be classed as high risk? My mum had BC 7 years ago when she was 47, does that make me high risk or would there need to be multiple family members. I check regularly but have never thought about scans of any sort as I know mammograms don't pick things up in women my age (31).
#9
Forum Regular
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Alice Springs NT
Posts: 180
Re: Mammograms for ladies in their 30's
Sorry to hear that your wife had to go through this, hope she is doing better now.
What would be classed as high risk? My mum had BC 7 years ago when she was 47, does that make me high risk or would there need to be multiple family members. I check regularly but have never thought about scans of any sort as I know mammograms don't pick things up in women my age (31).
What would be classed as high risk? My mum had BC 7 years ago when she was 47, does that make me high risk or would there need to be multiple family members. I check regularly but have never thought about scans of any sort as I know mammograms don't pick things up in women my age (31).
Not sure if its the same worldwide but in the UK it would be 3 or more direct family members, ie mother, grandmother, aunts, sisters. Also it is the hormonal based cancers that count. You can then get tested for the "breast cancer gene" my Mum, Sister and Aunt all had breat cancer and me and my other sister were offered the test. My sister had it done and doesn't have it, i actually declined the test as i check myself regularly and didn't really want to know.
First thing to find is was your mums cancer hormonally based.
good luck
claire
#10
Re: Mammograms for ladies in their 30's
I have mammograms every two years because of my age and the first one I had showed something in my breast, however it cannot be detected with ultra sound and I had to have a biopsy taken, its only seen on the xray. Nothing to feel either. So they just watch it now as they know what it is.
I told my friend who was not yet 50 that she should get a mammogram done and they are free for people over forty here but they do not call you back like they do for us over fifties. She went and had the mammogram and she had ductal carcinoma insitu and had both breasts removed within two weeks. Her surgeon told her she had thousands of cancer cells in the ducts of her breasts.
What I am saying is that if you are over 40 and have history then you should not be waiting to find a lump as not all cancer is a lump.
I told my friend who was not yet 50 that she should get a mammogram done and they are free for people over forty here but they do not call you back like they do for us over fifties. She went and had the mammogram and she had ductal carcinoma insitu and had both breasts removed within two weeks. Her surgeon told her she had thousands of cancer cells in the ducts of her breasts.
What I am saying is that if you are over 40 and have history then you should not be waiting to find a lump as not all cancer is a lump.
#11
Three of us
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 207
Re: Mammograms for ladies in their 30's
hettie, if you take no other advice this year, I'd urge you to take note of this.
My wife (39), was diagnosed with high grade breast cancer at Xmas. It was 2cm, but she found it herself. The routine Mammograms (family history) didn't pick it up any earlier.
Now these are not my words - but those of an experienced, highly esteemed breast surgeon - "Mammograms are not that effective in catching breast cancer tumors."
In Australia, high risk patients can now get Medicare rebates on MRI's. This has only been brought in over the last few months.
Now again, in the words of my wife's surgeon - "comparing an MRI to a Mammogram is like drawing parallels between a Rolls Royce and a Hyundai". The icing on the cake is that MRI's don't emit the radiation that Mammograms do.
So if you, or any other lady reading this, have any concerns at all, I would strongly urge you to gain peace of mind from the MRI route.
God bless darlin
Big Baz xxxx
My wife (39), was diagnosed with high grade breast cancer at Xmas. It was 2cm, but she found it herself. The routine Mammograms (family history) didn't pick it up any earlier.
Now these are not my words - but those of an experienced, highly esteemed breast surgeon - "Mammograms are not that effective in catching breast cancer tumors."
In Australia, high risk patients can now get Medicare rebates on MRI's. This has only been brought in over the last few months.
Now again, in the words of my wife's surgeon - "comparing an MRI to a Mammogram is like drawing parallels between a Rolls Royce and a Hyundai". The icing on the cake is that MRI's don't emit the radiation that Mammograms do.
So if you, or any other lady reading this, have any concerns at all, I would strongly urge you to gain peace of mind from the MRI route.
God bless darlin
Big Baz xxxx