LPG conversion for Subaru Outback '05
#1
Thread Starter
Forum Regular

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 34
From: QLD








No, it's not a for sale ad. Has anyone had fitted an LPG conversion to their Subaru - or any make of car for that matter.
Our Outback returns an average of 8.5 litres per 100km on petrol and considering the 4WD, auto 'box and the weight of the thing it's quite good for a 2.5 litre. But running it on LPG would reduce the cost of the weekly fill, but as I understand it economy would also be reduced to about 9.5 litres per 100km.
Has anyone any experience of an LPG conversion?
Paul.
Our Outback returns an average of 8.5 litres per 100km on petrol and considering the 4WD, auto 'box and the weight of the thing it's quite good for a 2.5 litre. But running it on LPG would reduce the cost of the weekly fill, but as I understand it economy would also be reduced to about 9.5 litres per 100km.
Has anyone any experience of an LPG conversion?
Paul.
#2
We wanted one doing on our 2 cars but were told that they were to young and there wasn't a kit available yet
#4
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,375











Tried to get a ute converted, there is a tank shortage
the fitters claim they cant get tanks, and if they can they then have a 2/3 month wait to fit the thing. Costs about $3400 now was around $2000 prior to the gov rebate. Beware of hidden costs too, most wanted more on top to adjust the muffler.
We were told the fuel consumption is generally 30% worse than petrol think even the RACQ said that.
the fitters claim they cant get tanks, and if they can they then have a 2/3 month wait to fit the thing. Costs about $3400 now was around $2000 prior to the gov rebate. Beware of hidden costs too, most wanted more on top to adjust the muffler. We were told the fuel consumption is generally 30% worse than petrol think even the RACQ said that.
#5
Tried to get a ute converted, there is a tank shortage
the fitters claim they cant get tanks, and if they can they then have a 2/3 month wait to fit the thing. Costs about $3400 now was around $2000 prior to the gov rebate. Beware of hidden costs too, most wanted more on top to adjust the muffler.
We were told the fuel consumption is generally 30% worse than petrol think even the RACQ said that.
the fitters claim they cant get tanks, and if they can they then have a 2/3 month wait to fit the thing. Costs about $3400 now was around $2000 prior to the gov rebate. Beware of hidden costs too, most wanted more on top to adjust the muffler. We were told the fuel consumption is generally 30% worse than petrol think even the RACQ said that.

John
Last edited by nickyjohnt; Jun 21st 2008 at 1:25 am.
#6
I put in 40 litres of LPG in my 4.0 fairmont and got about 300 k's out of it...cost $25
Dunno if this is any good
Lee
Dunno if this is any good

Lee
#7

Lee
#8
Thread Starter
Forum Regular

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 34
From: QLD








Thanks for your replies. From what I've gathered somewhere in the region of 10% to 30% reduction in fuel economy is not uncommon. This does negate some of the price difference at the pumps, of course, but not enough to make fitment an impractical proposition.
I haven't heard back from Subaru yet. I will let you know what they say when I do, if anthing for the benefit of Subaru Outback drivers.
Another consideration, and I'd like anyone's input on this the Outback, for those that don't know, is a station wagon (estate) car. Saloon cars have their tank installed behind the rear passenger seat or sometimes in the spare wheel well if it's big enough (unlucky if you have a space saver spare). The Outback doesn't have a space saver, so the 'hole' is huge, but so is the tyre and wheel that comes out of it. If the tank is placed behind the seats it's a stupid place to have it because it's on show and defeats the idea of having a 'wagon that carries stuff that requires the back seat to fold down flat. The saloon has the advantage that it's not a 'wagon and it has a handy boot lid to deter onlookers and the heat of the sun. Should I be concerned? Are there any LPG fitters on this board?
Cheers
Paul
I haven't heard back from Subaru yet. I will let you know what they say when I do, if anthing for the benefit of Subaru Outback drivers.
Another consideration, and I'd like anyone's input on this the Outback, for those that don't know, is a station wagon (estate) car. Saloon cars have their tank installed behind the rear passenger seat or sometimes in the spare wheel well if it's big enough (unlucky if you have a space saver spare). The Outback doesn't have a space saver, so the 'hole' is huge, but so is the tyre and wheel that comes out of it. If the tank is placed behind the seats it's a stupid place to have it because it's on show and defeats the idea of having a 'wagon that carries stuff that requires the back seat to fold down flat. The saloon has the advantage that it's not a 'wagon and it has a handy boot lid to deter onlookers and the heat of the sun. Should I be concerned? Are there any LPG fitters on this board?
Cheers
Paul
#9
Account Closed










Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,768

Thanks for your replies. From what I've gathered somewhere in the region of 10% to 30% reduction in fuel economy is not uncommon. This does negate some of the price difference at the pumps, of course, but not enough to make fitment an impractical proposition.
I haven't heard back from Subaru yet. I will let you know what they say when I do, if anthing for the benefit of Subaru Outback drivers.
Another consideration, and I'd like anyone's input on this the Outback, for those that don't know, is a station wagon (estate) car. Saloon cars have their tank installed behind the rear passenger seat or sometimes in the spare wheel well if it's big enough (unlucky if you have a space saver spare). The Outback doesn't have a space saver, so the 'hole' is huge, but so is the tyre and wheel that comes out of it. If the tank is placed behind the seats it's a stupid place to have it because it's on show and defeats the idea of having a 'wagon that carries stuff that requires the back seat to fold down flat. The saloon has the advantage that it's not a 'wagon and it has a handy boot lid to deter onlookers and the heat of the sun. Should I be concerned? Are there any LPG fitters on this board?
Cheers
Paul
I haven't heard back from Subaru yet. I will let you know what they say when I do, if anthing for the benefit of Subaru Outback drivers.
Another consideration, and I'd like anyone's input on this the Outback, for those that don't know, is a station wagon (estate) car. Saloon cars have their tank installed behind the rear passenger seat or sometimes in the spare wheel well if it's big enough (unlucky if you have a space saver spare). The Outback doesn't have a space saver, so the 'hole' is huge, but so is the tyre and wheel that comes out of it. If the tank is placed behind the seats it's a stupid place to have it because it's on show and defeats the idea of having a 'wagon that carries stuff that requires the back seat to fold down flat. The saloon has the advantage that it's not a 'wagon and it has a handy boot lid to deter onlookers and the heat of the sun. Should I be concerned? Are there any LPG fitters on this board?
Cheers
Paul




