Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Australia > The Barbie
Reload this Page >

Are generalisations generally general?

Wikiposts

Are generalisations generally general?

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 9th 2005 | 12:44 am
  #1  
Vash the Stampede's Avatar
Thread Starter
Fighting my corner
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,948
From: Adelaide, South Australia
Vash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond repute
Cool Are generalisations generally general?

Let's have your views on this controversial issue!
 
Old Dec 9th 2005 | 1:14 am
  #2  
DunRoaminTheUK's Avatar
Oiiii.. You slaggg!
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,209
From: Brisbaneshire
DunRoaminTheUK has a reputation beyond reputeDunRoaminTheUK has a reputation beyond reputeDunRoaminTheUK has a reputation beyond reputeDunRoaminTheUK has a reputation beyond reputeDunRoaminTheUK has a reputation beyond reputeDunRoaminTheUK has a reputation beyond reputeDunRoaminTheUK has a reputation beyond reputeDunRoaminTheUK has a reputation beyond reputeDunRoaminTheUK has a reputation beyond reputeDunRoaminTheUK has a reputation beyond reputeDunRoaminTheUK has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Are generalisations generally general?

Originally Posted by Vash the Stampede
Let's have your views on this controversial issue!
I think that a generalisation that is generally general actually causes the generality of the original generalisation to generally become inifinitely reduceable in generalisation but whilst never actually getting to a point where the generalised generalisation loses it's generality completely, as a generalisation does not actually encompass an entire group therefore generalised generalisations actually reduce the generalisation of the first generality FFS!

Last edited by DunRoaminTheUK; Dec 9th 2005 at 1:23 am.
 
Old Dec 9th 2005 | 1:16 am
  #3  
Pollyana's Avatar
Home and Happy
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 94,307
From: Keep true friends and puppets close, trust no-one else...
Pollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Are generalisations generally general?

Originally Posted by DunRoaminTheUK
I think that a generalisation that is generally general actually causes the generality of the original generalisation to generally become inifinitely reduceable in generalisation but whilst never actually getting to a point where the generalised generalisation loses it's generality as generlisation does not actually encompass an entire group therefore generalised generalisations actually reduce the generlisation of the first generality FFS!
Que??

(he's from Barcelona, you know.....)
 
Old Dec 9th 2005 | 1:17 am
  #4  
OzTennis's Avatar
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,949
From: Scotland
OzTennis has a reputation beyond reputeOzTennis has a reputation beyond reputeOzTennis has a reputation beyond reputeOzTennis has a reputation beyond reputeOzTennis has a reputation beyond reputeOzTennis has a reputation beyond reputeOzTennis has a reputation beyond reputeOzTennis has a reputation beyond reputeOzTennis has a reputation beyond reputeOzTennis has a reputation beyond reputeOzTennis has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Are generalisations generally general?

'I believe that what I see and do becomes a generalisation' (British Expats mantra, generally speaking, for most posters).

OzTennis
 
Old Dec 9th 2005 | 1:18 am
  #5  
Vegemite Kids's Avatar
You sip .... I glug !!!
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,790
From: Over the hill!
Vegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Are generalisations generally general?

Originally Posted by DunRoaminTheUK
I think that a generalisation that is generally general actually causes the generality of the original generalisation to generally become inifinitely reduceable in generalisation but whilst never actually getting to a point where the generalised generalisation loses it's generality as generlisation does not actually encompass an entire group therefore generalised generalisations actually reduce the generlisation of the first generality FFS!
Was just about to say exactly that
 
Old Dec 9th 2005 | 1:19 am
  #6  
stevenpoole9
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Are generalisations generally general?

Generally, Yes. Occasionally, no.
 
Old Dec 9th 2005 | 1:36 am
  #7  
ub40fan's Avatar
Where I want to be
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,220
From: In my own head
ub40fan has a reputation beyond reputeub40fan has a reputation beyond reputeub40fan has a reputation beyond reputeub40fan has a reputation beyond reputeub40fan has a reputation beyond reputeub40fan has a reputation beyond reputeub40fan has a reputation beyond reputeub40fan has a reputation beyond reputeub40fan has a reputation beyond reputeub40fan has a reputation beyond reputeub40fan has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Are generalisations generally general?

Originally Posted by DunRoaminTheUK
I think that a generalisation that is generally general actually causes the generality of the original generalisation to generally become inifinitely reduceable in generalisation but whilst never actually getting to a point where the generalised generalisation loses it's generality completely, as a generalisation does not actually encompass an entire group therefore generalised generalisations actually reduce the generalisation of the first generality FFS!
gotta go lie down in a dark room, this is too much to think about on a friday afternoon.
 
Old Dec 9th 2005 | 2:10 am
  #8  
Lerop Pekill's Avatar
NO 8 THE LEGEND
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,368
From: Dyslexia Rules KO
Lerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Are generalisations generally general?

Originally Posted by Vash the Stampede
Let's have your views on this controversial issue!
A person puts up a post regarding a very important day in their daughters life, and because the title is not worded to your liking you choose to make fun of it?


You are mocking Madsads post i assume.
 
Old Dec 9th 2005 | 2:27 am
  #9  
Amazulu's Avatar
Proudly Deplorable
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 24,249
From: Alloha snack bar
Amazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Are generalisations generally general?

Where are the whingiest Aussies:
Aussies in Australia, or
Aussies in the UK.

Although they are generally a whingy nation, they are not too bad over here, so I reckon it's the latter. As soon as they leave Australia, the whingy gene kicks in & the UK gets it in the ear.

Generally, this is not a generalisation.
 
Old Dec 9th 2005 | 2:43 am
  #10  
Vegemite Kids's Avatar
You sip .... I glug !!!
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,790
From: Over the hill!
Vegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Are generalisations generally general?

Originally Posted by Lerop Pekill
A person puts up a post regarding a very important day in their daughters life, and because the title is not worded to your liking you choose to make fun of it?


You are mocking Madsads post i assume.
Actually I think you will find he is mocking the whole "general" thing rather than madsad's post

There have been a number of "generalising" posts

Madsad's - started at 7.12pm http://britishexpats.com/forum/showthread.php?t=341903

then Luke's - started at 7.35pm http://britishexpats.com/forum/showthread.php?t=341907

then Menace's - started at 9.22pm http://britishexpats.com/forum/showthread.php?t=341926

and finally Vash's - started at 9.44pm
http://britishexpats.com/forum/showthread.php?t=341927

and thats excluding all the posts that generalise about life in OZ, UK, US etc that we see every day.

so who is mocking who ? or is that whom is mocking whom ?
 
Old Dec 9th 2005 | 2:48 am
  #11  
Lerop Pekill's Avatar
NO 8 THE LEGEND
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,368
From: Dyslexia Rules KO
Lerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Are generalisations generally general?

Originally Posted by Vegemite Kids
Actually I think you will find he is mocking the whole "general" thing rather than madsad's post

There have been a number of "generalising" posts

Madsad's - started at 7.12pm http://britishexpats.com/forum/showthread.php?t=341903

then Luke's - started at 7.35pm http://britishexpats.com/forum/showthread.php?t=341907

then Menace's - started at 9.22pm http://britishexpats.com/forum/showthread.php?t=341926

and finally Vash's - started at 9.44pm
http://britishexpats.com/forum/showthread.php?t=341927

and thats excluding all the posts that generalise about life in OZ, UK, US etc that we see every day.

so who is mocking who ? or is that whom is mocking whom ?
Dead clever though eh?
 
Old Dec 9th 2005 | 2:50 am
  #12  
Scossie's Avatar
Scottish Aussie ©
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,009
From: Belmont, Perth, WA
Scossie has a reputation beyond reputeScossie has a reputation beyond reputeScossie has a reputation beyond reputeScossie has a reputation beyond reputeScossie has a reputation beyond reputeScossie has a reputation beyond reputeScossie has a reputation beyond reputeScossie has a reputation beyond reputeScossie has a reputation beyond reputeScossie has a reputation beyond reputeScossie has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Are generalisations generally general?

Originally Posted by Lerop Pekill
A person puts up a post regarding a very important day in their daughters life, and because the title is not worded to your liking you choose to make fun of it?


You are mocking Madsads post i assume.

Nope,
I think Vash is just putting a, "Lounge" type post in the Oz forum.

I for one, wanna see more of this, cos The Lounge can be a bit of a, "closed shop" if you're not a regular. (So can the Oz Forum, but not nearly as much)...

I've no idea where you're getting the, "Madsad" connection from, & I reckon Vash doesn't either...

Just a bit of fun, I reckon...
Don't look too deep for something that isn't there, I'd say...
 
Old Dec 9th 2005 | 2:59 am
  #13  
Lerop Pekill's Avatar
NO 8 THE LEGEND
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,368
From: Dyslexia Rules KO
Lerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond reputeLerop Pekill has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Are generalisations generally general?

Originally Posted by Scossie

Nope,
I think Vash is just putting a, "Lounge" type post in the Oz forum.

I for one, wanna see more of this, cos The Lounge can be a bit of a, "closed shop" if you're not a regular. (So can the Oz Forum, but not nearly as much)...

I've no idea where you're getting the, "Madsad" connection from, & I reckon Vash doesn't either...

Just a bit of fun, I reckon...
Don't look too deep for something that isn't there, I'd say...

OK.
 
Old Dec 9th 2005 | 3:02 am
  #14  
DunRoaminTheUK's Avatar
Oiiii.. You slaggg!
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,209
From: Brisbaneshire
DunRoaminTheUK has a reputation beyond reputeDunRoaminTheUK has a reputation beyond reputeDunRoaminTheUK has a reputation beyond reputeDunRoaminTheUK has a reputation beyond reputeDunRoaminTheUK has a reputation beyond reputeDunRoaminTheUK has a reputation beyond reputeDunRoaminTheUK has a reputation beyond reputeDunRoaminTheUK has a reputation beyond reputeDunRoaminTheUK has a reputation beyond reputeDunRoaminTheUK has a reputation beyond reputeDunRoaminTheUK has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Are generalisations generally general?

Originally Posted by Scossie
Don't look too deep for something that isn't there, I'd say...
Like oil?
 
Old Dec 9th 2005 | 3:03 am
  #15  
Vegemite Kids's Avatar
You sip .... I glug !!!
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,790
From: Over the hill!
Vegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Are generalisations generally general?

Originally Posted by DunRoaminTheUK
Like oil?


ppppppppppppffffffffffffff
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.