![]() |
Re: Dr Who
Originally Posted by moneypenny20
(Post 10259316)
So just because you see it the same time as the UK, and I queried why it mattered, you felt the need to tell us it's a good episode and post a trailer? Nice one, thanks for that. Unsubscribe.
|
Re: Dr Who
OH wtched it on his Ipad, but with his earplugs in so I couldn't see or hear it. As DD was revising for exams this week, we are waiting until it comes on TV to watch it. Hopefully DD's friends won't spoil it for her by telling her what happens. OH knows better than to do so.
|
Re: Dr Who
Originally Posted by carolinephillips
(Post 10260452)
OH wtched it on his Ipad, but with his earplugs in so I couldn't see or hear it. As DD was revising for exams this week, we are waiting until it comes on TV to watch it. Hopefully DD's friends won't spoil it for her by telling her what happens. OH knows better than to do so.
BTW Neil Gaiman won a Hugo for "The Doctor's Wife" and 'let slip' that he might be writing another episode “...only a fool or a mad man would try to do it again... so I’m on the third draft.†|
Re: Dr Who
Episode one of the new series was Matt Smith's best one yet IMHO.
I have been missing David Tennant and not really enjoyed Matt Smith, but this episode was great :thumbup: |
Re: Dr Who
Think I read somewhere that this effort by the ABC resulted in their highest ever iView audience...so at last a broadcaster downunder gets it. If "they" want to stop piracy for TV programs, let the audience have immediate access worldwide, not 6 months later when anyone who wants to really watch has ripped it off the net already. Ch's 7, 10 and especially 9 really need to wake up to this, although they'd probably trash the whole idea by plastering ads all over the place and those stupid banners at the bottom of the screen. Within 10 years I'd say the majority of TV will come through the net.
|
Re: Dr Who
Originally Posted by Tom Sawyer
(Post 10272292)
Think I read somewhere that this effort by the ABC resulted in their highest ever iView audience...so at last a broadcaster downunder gets it. If "they" want to stop piracy for TV programs, let the audience have immediate access worldwide, not 6 months later when anyone who wants to really watch has ripped it off the net already. Ch's 7, 10 and especially 9 really need to wake up to this, although they'd probably trash the whole idea by plastering ads all over the place and those stupid banners at the bottom of the screen. Within 10 years I'd say the majority of TV will come through the net.
It's also interesting that downloading the 720p BT version took ~20mins 24 hours after release. There is probably a crossover point when its better to download over BT than watch iView, and its probably within about 6-10 hours of transmission. And yes, they would probably try to plaster ads all over it - which decreases the usefulness and increases the value of the BT rips. Luckily blocking web ads has become something of a mature art... |
Re: Dr Who
Originally Posted by Tom Sawyer
(Post 10272292)
Think I read somewhere that this effort by the ABC resulted in their highest ever iView audience...so at last a broadcaster downunder gets it. If "they" want to stop piracy for TV programs, let the audience have immediate access worldwide, not 6 months later when anyone who wants to really watch has ripped it off the net already. Ch's 7, 10 and especially 9 really need to wake up to this, although they'd probably trash the whole idea by plastering ads all over the place and those stupid banners at the bottom of the screen. Within 10 years I'd say the majority of TV will come through the net.
http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/...911-25qha.html |
Re: Dr Who
I was disappointed with it- very predictable. Matt Smith is painful to watch- not the acting, just the physical form. He looks like he has ricketts and is an old man. Get him some decent trousers for goodness sake.
|
Re: Dr Who
I really enjoyed it, but am nagging the oh to work out how to get downton for me this weekend... Have given him loads of pointers...
|
Re: Dr Who
Originally Posted by carolinephillips
(Post 10276697)
I was disappointed with it- very predictable. Matt Smith is painful to watch- not the acting, just the physical form. He looks like he has ricketts and is an old man. Get him some decent trousers for goodness sake.
|
Re: Dr Who
Eggs...
Eggs... Eggs... Eggs...ter...min...ate!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Re: Dr Who
Originally Posted by carolinephillips
(Post 10276697)
I was disappointed with it- very predictable. Matt Smith is painful to watch- not the acting, just the physical form. He looks like he has ricketts and is an old man. Get him some decent trousers for goodness sake.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 11:29 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.