![]() |
Re: The Cricket Thread
Originally Posted by OzTennis
(Post 12111471)
It would appear the lesson from Faf is to shine the ball on the zip of your trousers (2013) or eat mints and use the saliva to shine the ball (2016). Kohli at it too and both winners! Perhaps we're just legal with ball maintenance or maintainance if you will?
Why do you always speak of Australia in the 3rd person? It's never us, we etc it's the Aussies or the Australians? Do you still think the most successful captain of all time, any country, with 219 wins out of 322 matches is poor? He had a batting average of 52 in the 77 tests he captained as well. :rofl: Anyhow, Faf found guilty of ball tampering for a second time. No suspension. There we have it as I said, nothing will come of this. Probably should have been a third time after being warned in Perth. I wonder if Adelaide will roll out another swingers deck. Lets hope not. I'm going to day 3 and it would be nice to see some play. :) |
Re: The Cricket Thread
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 12111497)
Oh my. Mr Cricket / Mr Tennis has joined us with further nonsense. Sorry bud, I didn't mean to take the shine away from you exceptionally low level of cricket knowledge. :)
Anyhow, Faf found guilty of ball tampering for a second time. No suspension. There we have it as I said, nothing will come of this. Probably should have been a third time after being warned in Perth. I wonder if Adelaide will roll out another swingers deck. Lets hope not. I'm going to day 3 and it would be nice to see some play. :) He lost his match fee, has penalty points, further transgression will result in suspension and the good name of SA cricket has been besmirched as they will surely be accused of cheating no matter how trivial it seems. |
Re: The Cricket Thread
Maybe the Channel 9 reporter should be charged and fined too?
I hope du Plessis puts it behind him and makes lots of runs in the third test. That would be sweet. |
Re: The Cricket Thread
Australia suffer an abysmal defeat so hey let's detract attention away from the most appalling display of cricketing prowess by accusing the S.A captain of cheating.
A look back at the Aussie bowlers/team and most of them are sucking mints or chewing gum. Go back further and weren't England accused of using Murray Mints to win the 2005 Ashes? Mints, gum, sweat & sunscreen all used for a bit of extra shine. Du Plessis guilty of tampering means the umpire can award an extra 5 runs so a loss by an innings and 80 runs becomes a mere innings and 75 runs:nod: |
Re: The Cricket Thread
Originally Posted by cresta57
(Post 12111945)
Australia suffer an abysmal defeat so hey let's detract attention away from the most appalling display of cricketing prowess by accusing the S.A captain of cheating.
A look back at the Aussie bowlers/team and most of them are sucking mints or chewing gum. Go back further and weren't England accused of using Murray Mints to win the 2005 Ashes? Mints, gum, sweat & sunscreen all used for a bit of extra shine. Du Plessis guilty of tampering means the umpire can award an extra 5 runs so a loss by an innings and 80 runs becomes a mere innings and 75 runs:nod: David Warner was saying that this incident had little outcome on the result |
Re: The Cricket Thread
Originally Posted by OzTennis
(Post 12111630)
Well you expected nothing to come of the Faf case. Quote 'I bet nothing comes of this'. He was not suspended only because of a technicality which for some reason saw his 2013 conviction dropped or not counted or happened outside of a 2 year period or whatever - as far as his hearing went he was a first time offender. :confused:
He lost his match fee, has penalty points, further transgression will result in suspension and the good name of SA cricket has been besmirched as they will surely be accused of cheating no matter how trivial it seems. He's been done. Move on As for cheating, there are plenty of incidents of Australia cheating if you want to go down that road! |
Re: The Cricket Thread
Originally Posted by cresta57
(Post 12111945)
Australia suffer an abysmal defeat so hey let's detract attention away from the most appalling display of cricketing prowess by accusing the S.A captain of cheating.
A look back at the Aussie bowlers/team and most of them are sucking mints or chewing gum. Go back further and weren't England accused of using Murray Mints to win the 2005 Ashes? Mints, gum, sweat & sunscreen all used for a bit of extra shine. Du Plessis guilty of tampering means the umpire can award an extra 5 runs so a loss by an innings and 80 runs becomes a mere innings and 75 runs:nod: Nice try though. Didn't work. |
Re: The Cricket Thread
Originally Posted by OzTennis
(Post 12111630)
Well you expected nothing to come of the Faf case. Quote 'I bet nothing comes of this'. He was not suspended only because of a technicality which for some reason saw his 2013 conviction dropped or not counted or happened outside of a 2 year period or whatever - as far as his hearing went he was a first time offender. :confused:
He lost his match fee, has penalty points, further transgression will result in suspension and the good name of SA cricket has been besmirched as they will surely be accused of cheating no matter how trivial it seems. |
Re: The Cricket Thread
Originally Posted by cresta57
(Post 12111945)
Australia suffer an abysmal defeat so hey let's detract attention away from the most appalling display of cricketing prowess by accusing the S.A captain of cheating.
A look back at the Aussie bowlers/team and most of them are sucking mints or chewing gum. Go back further and weren't England accused of using Murray Mints to win the 2005 Ashes? Mints, gum, sweat & sunscreen all used for a bit of extra shine. Du Plessis guilty of tampering means the umpire can award an extra 5 runs so a loss by an innings and 80 runs becomes a mere innings and 75 runs:nod: |
Re: The Cricket Thread
Originally Posted by Alfresco
(Post 12111861)
Maybe the Channel 9 reporter should be charged and fined too?
I hope du Plessis puts it behind him and makes lots of runs in the third test. That would be sweet. |
Re: The Cricket Thread
Originally Posted by Amazulu
(Post 12111981)
That's not a technicality teach, that's the rules being applied
He's been done. Move on As for cheating, there are plenty of incidents of Australia cheating if you want to go down that road! Australia were pathetic in Sri Lanka and have been pathetic against SA. No excuses from me. End of. It's interesting in the Wiki on ball tampering that it specifically mentions - Atherton, Tendulkar, Pakistan 2006, Anderson and Broad, Afridi, Du Plessis twice, Philander and Siddle who was accused by SL but cleared by ICC. Draw your own conclusions. |
Re: The Cricket Thread
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 12112000)
You should have stayed up late and watched it. You might have been able to add value.
|
Re: The Cricket Thread
I see the appointment of Hick as batting coach is paying dividends. :D
|
Re: The Cricket Thread
Originally Posted by DeadVim
(Post 12113043)
I see the appointment of Hick as batting coach is paying dividends. :D
Regardless, not much you can do against a ball ducking a diving around like the Saffa's have been able to do. The only thing you can do is bowl just as well, and chew mints. Makes for short tests though. |
Re: The Cricket Thread
That would be 3 tosses from 3 for Faf
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 6:35 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.