![]() |
Re: The Cricket Thread
I do fear the selectors are going to pick Johnson over Hazelwood or Starc or Harris. I just don't see Johnson being better than the above 3 on English wickets in front of English crowds.
Though more than happy to be proved wrong. |
Re: The Cricket Thread
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11680479)
I got it, it wasn't funny, so didn't warrant a LOL or smiley face.
I can assure you, believe me or not, that you won't be subjected to the backend slums of Birmingham tennis community while watch cricket there. On the other hand Trent Bridge is a must. Of course if women aren't your thing then the Hooters Bar won't be of appeal. I don't need to go to a bar to pick up women, I've got a wife already. |
Re: The Cricket Thread
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11680546)
I do fear the selectors are going to pick Johnson over Hazelwood or Starc or Harris. I just don't see Johnson being better than the above 3 on English wickets in front of English crowds.
Though more than happy to be proved wrong. Are you making a pilgrimage to Lourdes for the 2nd Test? |
Re: The Cricket Thread
Originally Posted by OzTennis
(Post 11680669)
Nottingham - gun capital of the UK; been there for tennis too; no desire to return also.
I don't need to go to a bar to pick up women, I've got a wife already. |
Re: The Cricket Thread
Originally Posted by OzTennis
(Post 11680671)
Are you one of the previous observers that Johnson was a pie chucker, puts them here and there etc? Starc and Johnson for sure then Hazlewood (more spelling homework for you boy) or Harris.
Are you making a pilgrimage to Lourdes for the 2nd Test? On Johnson. Not at all, in fact if you recall the last Cricket Thread I was a big defender of his record. This was when he was at his lowest point before his comeback. I certainly believe he is a worthy contender for the 4 quicks though. He's just not at the top of his game right now. Johnson is pretty awesome on dry hard surfaces that promote pace. On the slower swinging jobs you've got to pick the guys who have the swing. If you've ever played cricket (obviously not) you would know that as a batsman you would rather face pace than swing, any day of the week. That's why you need to pick swingers which is Harris, Starc and Hazelwood, no matter how fit Harris is, he's a grafter and he is good in England. There's a reason why Anderson can take wickets at home and no where else. |
Re: The Cricket Thread
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11680688)
Its a pity. You don't know much about English conditions do you. Best stick to Tennis :)
On Johnson. Not at all, in fact if you recall the last Cricket Thread I was a big defender of his record. This was when he was at his lowest point before his comeback. I certainly believe he is a worthy contender for the 4 quicks though. He's just not at the top of his game right now. Johnson is pretty awesome on dry hard surfaces that promote pace. On the slower swinging jobs you've got to pick the guys who have the swing. If you've ever played cricket (obviously not) you would know that as a batsman you would rather face pace than swing, any day of the week. That's why you need to pick swingers which is Harris, Starc and Hazelwood, no matter how fit Harris is, he's a grafter and he is good in England. There's a reason why Anderson can take wickets at home and no where else. Anderson is past it as his stats at home and abroad of late show; he's not the force he once was and not surprising as he's near the end of his career. I was distinctly unimpressed with both he and Broad at the G but as you say English conditions might suit more. For the record I had to make a choice between tennis and cricket when I got to the age of 18 as both were played on a Saturday afternoon; I opted for the former. I've played cricket on and off since however. I wonder if you have played with and against test cricketers and Shield cricketers? You think Ponting was a poor captain (don't go over that ground again, look at his win/loss record and compare it to any other captain) so I take a lot of your opinions with a pinch of the proverbial. 100 lines; Edgbaston, Hazlewood! |
Re: The Cricket Thread
Cricket starts tomorrow. I'd like to pay tribute to Darren Gough.
|
Re: The Cricket Thread
I think the Ashes will be a lot closer than most Australian commentators believe they will be. Stokes and Root may see to that. We can only hope that the Aussies don't go all stupid with their sledging and jeering. Well, we can include Anderson among the jeering yobs, I guess. (I am old-fashioned enough to consider sledging to be pure cheating. As for jeering when a batsman gets out - that's just schoolyard bullying.)
|
Re: The Cricket Thread
Originally Posted by Gordon Barlow
(Post 11693394)
I think the Ashes will be a lot closer than most Australian commentators believe they will be. Stokes and Root may see to that. We can only hope that the Aussies don't go all stupid with their sledging and jeering. Well, we can include Anderson among the jeering yobs, I guess. (I am old-fashioned enough to consider sledging to be pure cheating. As for jeering when a batsman gets out - that's just schoolyard bullying.)
I too think it will be close. I'm going for 2 - 1 to Australia. Any other predictions to get proceedings under way? |
Re: The Cricket Thread
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11693397)
Yes Anderson needs to curb his ways. He looked like an idiot sledging in the last Ashes.
I too think it will be close. I'm going for 2 - 1 to Australia. Any other predictions to get proceedings under way? 2-0 SA (v Bangladesh) |
Re: The Cricket Thread
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11693397)
Yes Anderson needs to curb his ways. He looked like an idiot sledging in the last Ashes.
I too think it will be close. I'm going for 2 - 1 to Australia. Any other predictions to get proceedings under way? I think Australia will just edge it; who knows the likely score as you always have to factor in the weather not allowing enough play for a result. I do think Starc is going to have a big influence on the series. |
Re: The Cricket Thread
1st session, England win toss and bat; 3 for 88 and Haddin dropped an easy one off Root 2nd ball, could have been worse for England. Starc and Hazlewood looking dangerous and Lyon even got a wicket. Cook and Bell might be needing the services of Trott's psychologist this early. Root and Ballance partnership will be very crucial for England.
|
Re: The Cricket Thread
Originally Posted by OzTennis
(Post 11694571)
1st session, England win toss and bat; 3 for 88 and Haddin dropped an easy one off Root 2nd ball, could have been worse for England. Starc and Hazlewood looking dangerous and Lyon even got a wicket. Cook and Bell might be needing the services of Trott's psychologist this early. Root and Ballance partnership will be very crucial for England.
Australia very lucky England chose to bat. Ball was skipping around like a mother f88ker. Australia should be disappointed they couldn't control the swing better. Ball now wet, lost its edge. Anyones contest. |
Re: The Cricket Thread
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11694580)
Oh dear you have no idea about cricket do you.
Australia very lucky England chose to bat. Ball was skipping around like a mother f88ker. Australia should be disappointed they couldn't control the swing better. Ball now wet, lost its edge. Anyones contest. |
Re: The Cricket Thread
Interesting start to series, Root and Ballance counter-attacking right now.
It could be a very good contest ... The usual caveat, don't judge until both teams have batted ... |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 6:57 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.