Best sites for storing photos
#1
I'm planning on scanning a load of my old photos to keep the images safe if our shipment sinks or some other disaster might happen
Just wondering about who others use for online photo storage and what sort of capacity is available
Just wondering about who others use for online photo storage and what sort of capacity is available
#2
Hillarys, Perth






Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,094
From: Hillarys, Perth.











I use a couple of on line storage sites. www.kodak.com is good. American site, but easy to share the phot's with people.
Check out www.photbox.com They are a UK site which have an exellent 'Style Book' where you upload the photo's and paste them into pages of you design, with text boxes so you can write a description/story. The finished quality is amazing, VERY good in fact, it looks just like a published magazine.
Hope this helps.
Neil.
Check out www.photbox.com They are a UK site which have an exellent 'Style Book' where you upload the photo's and paste them into pages of you design, with text boxes so you can write a description/story. The finished quality is amazing, VERY good in fact, it looks just like a published magazine.
Hope this helps.
Neil.
#4
Forum Regular



Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 136
From: Toowoomba, Queensland








You can now buy 10GB USB sticks. Load them onto a few of these and take them with you in your hand luggage.
I bought a 5GB one off ebay for about £15 a couple of months ago, and they are always coming down in price.
It might be better, if you have loads to do, to get them done properly at a photo shop, as scanning them makes them into huge files, usually bitmaps, whereas the shops will convert them to JPEG, which are much easier to handle and store.
If you have the software, you can do it yourself, but it will take a fair whack of time.
I bought a 5GB one off ebay for about £15 a couple of months ago, and they are always coming down in price.
It might be better, if you have loads to do, to get them done properly at a photo shop, as scanning them makes them into huge files, usually bitmaps, whereas the shops will convert them to JPEG, which are much easier to handle and store.
If you have the software, you can do it yourself, but it will take a fair whack of time.
#6
In melbourne




Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 263







Flickr works well for me... The link is in my sig. If you want to store lots at full res and be able to retrieve them at full res tho expect to pay for the service..
#10
BE Forum Addict






Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,820
From: Adelaide - South Australia











I use shutterfly and photobucket.
Alternatively, you could...
1. Copy them onto CD
2. Copy them onto Memory Sticks
3. Get a portable hard drive - and copy the entire contents of your hard drive (which is a good idea anyway).
#11
this site...premium membership gets private photo albums...
but http://www.imageshack.us/ is also pretty good....there's basically loads of sites, but if you've got gigs of stuff, it'll take a while to upload...and might as well just look for online storage sites and there are loads if you do a google
but http://www.imageshack.us/ is also pretty good....there's basically loads of sites, but if you've got gigs of stuff, it'll take a while to upload...and might as well just look for online storage sites and there are loads if you do a google
Last edited by Bob; May 7th 2007 at 3:46 pm.
#12
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 938
From: Sydney, Australia - formerly Portsmouth UK











I also use Picassa. Its free and they give you plenty of space (more than a gig if I remember correctly). You can also mark albums as private so that only people you select can view them.
#13
Most scanning software should allow you to store as JPG rather than BMP. The other thing is that it's not worth scanning photos as a really high resolution. Photos are only printed at something like 150 dpi, so you don't need to scan any higher. I think I leave mine at about 300 dpi. You might need to check those numbers or experiment yourself to make sure, but you certainly don't need to do it at something like 1200 dpi which would give a huge file and picture.
#14
Most scanning software should allow you to store as JPG rather than BMP. The other thing is that it's not worth scanning photos as a really high resolution. Photos are only printed at something like 150 dpi, so you don't need to scan any higher. I think I leave mine at about 300 dpi. You might need to check those numbers or experiment yourself to make sure, but you certainly don't need to do it at something like 1200 dpi which would give a huge file and picture.





