Australia versus China?
#1
Thread Starter
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,396
From: Cayman Islands











We don't read much about Australia over here in the Western Hemisphere; but here's an interesting report. I guess it's not just Afghanistan that's on Australia's hit-list! Wow.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-1...-china-islands
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-1...-china-islands
#2
We don't read much about Australia over here in the Western Hemisphere; but here's an interesting report. I guess it's not just Afghanistan that's on Australia's hit-list! Wow.
In Latest Escalation, Australia May Join US, Send Warships To China Islands | Zero Hedge
In Latest Escalation, Australia May Join US, Send Warships To China Islands | Zero Hedge
creation of more than 3,000 acres of new sovereign territory
By the way, the Spratlys have been on the radar as a flash point for at least 20 years to my knowledge - one of those live wires that you don't touch unless you want to cause strife. China touched it.
#3
As to the power of China it’s interesting to reflect that one of the most dominant features of the last two centuries has been an increasing divergence between the ‘developing’ world and the 'developed' world (measured by GDP per capita). In a way the aberration has been the last decade and a half in which developing countries have experienced higher growth rates than developed countries so briefly appeared although they were on a converging path with the developed world. However growth rates are not persistent and it appears the global situation is normalising with economies regressing towards the long term mean growth rates.
#4
We don't read much about Australia over here in the Western Hemisphere; but here's an interesting report. I guess it's not just Afghanistan that's on Australia's hit-list! Wow.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-1...-china-islands
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-1...-china-islands
China are acting like assholes - those reefs are not their sovereign territory
China will not go to war with it's own economy - and the US Navy could destroy it within a few months anyway
Zerohedge is a source of information for nutjobs BTW
#5
Yup. The assertion that this is Chinese sovereign territory is just plan wrong. The entire international community is declining to recognise these islands as Chinese - as has the UN. There is no enduring claim to them, and all the dredging and building isn't going to change that.
The crucial problem here is exactly what the Pacific powers are going to do about it. These have been built essentially as static Chinese aircraft carriers in the Pacific. They only have one functioning carrier, and no real history of competence in carrier operations.
It will be interesting to see how this pans out - but I don't imagine that China will risk war. It will probably get as far as blustering and sabre rattling though.
S
#6
I thought the runway looked long enough to get a conventional aircraft into the air? Either way as a strategic asset it seems unlikely to be of any value, it doesn't move so it'll have a crater in the runway before it can launch an aircraft.
#7
Account Closed
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 0

Oil and gas, such an old fashioned reason to go to war.
#10
Yup. The assertion that this is Chinese sovereign territory is just plan wrong. The entire international community is declining to recognise these islands as Chinese - as has the UN. There is no enduring claim to them, and all the dredging and building isn't going to change that.
The crucial problem here is exactly what the Pacific powers are going to do about it. These have been built essentially as static Chinese aircraft carriers in the Pacific. They only have one functioning carrier, and no real history of competence in carrier operations.
It will be interesting to see how this pans out - but I don't imagine that China will risk war. It will probably get as far as blustering and sabre rattling though.
S
The crucial problem here is exactly what the Pacific powers are going to do about it. These have been built essentially as static Chinese aircraft carriers in the Pacific. They only have one functioning carrier, and no real history of competence in carrier operations.
It will be interesting to see how this pans out - but I don't imagine that China will risk war. It will probably get as far as blustering and sabre rattling though.
S
Anti-ship ballistic missiles? I think it's safe to say that the US would tell China that throwing those around would lead to a nuclear response - which I'm sure they would want to avoid
#12
Thread Starter
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,396
From: Cayman Islands











BE readers would do well to take a look at some of ZeroHedge's contributors and their contributions, and assess the Zulu's judgment accordingly.
#13
Speaking of nutjobs, Zulu: what do you call someone who interprets the heading "Australia versus China?" as in some way meaning "USA versus China?"
BE readers would do well to take a look at some of ZeroHedge's contributors and their contributions, and assess the Zulu's judgment accordingly.
BE readers would do well to take a look at some of ZeroHedge's contributors and their contributions, and assess the Zulu's judgment accordingly.
The problem with zerohedge is that everything the west does is bad, everything is a conspiracy theory, everything is the USA's fault, everything the 3rd world does is perfect etc
Believe what you want champ but it doesn't take much intelligence to realise that the world ain't quite like that
#14
Agree. That's why I said the USN, on their own would end China's economy in a few months
Anti-ship ballistic missiles? I think it's safe to say that the US would tell China that throwing those around would lead to a nuclear response - which I'm sure they would want to avoid
Anti-ship ballistic missiles? I think it's safe to say that the US would tell China that throwing those around would lead to a nuclear response - which I'm sure they would want to avoid
Thats the beauty of Nuclear weapons, the US may as well drop one on themselves.
Ergo there wont be a war.
Not sure why we get one sided reporting on this stuff.... Nothing about the islands that western allied powers build.




