![]() |
Re: Another abduction case... this time Wales.
Originally Posted by Zen10
(Post 10310738)
Mass DNA collection by force would lower the country down into the sort of place you simply wouldn't want to live. Certain people would of course be exempt, so not everyone would be on it, and as you rightly point out most of these psychos are known to police anyway - as indeed was the case in this latest horror.
I for one would never submit to having my DNA taken so it would have to be taken by force - which they do - consider that for a moment. A decent innocent man pinned to the ground with a boot in his face while state officials violate his body for his personal DNA. Most depressing is that otherwise intelligent people can be so stupid to support this without realising where it will end. It's a slippery slope to go down, and not one I would ever go down willingly. |
Re: Another abduction case... this time Wales.
Originally Posted by mrsgreenstar76
(Post 10310741)
Yep. I'd fight tooth & nail against having DNA taken. Ironically, if I literally fought with teeth & nails, they'd have the DNA sample anyway! :eek:
It's a slippery slope to go down, and not one I would ever go down willingly. |
Re: Another abduction case... this time Wales.
Originally Posted by Zen10
(Post 10310746)
Quite. All right-thinking people should and must object to it. The US and UK are leading the free world in civil liberties violations (face recog. cameras in US police cars, mass finger-printing and photographs of population, world's biggest CCTV network and DNA database in UK), but Australia will follow these places as well if it's not fought.
|
Re: Another abduction case... this time Wales.
Got to admit the DNA list, is a far more emotive subject than I first realised. I can understand why. I think it's possible as one gets older that the positives in what this would on the surface be trying to acheive comes more to the surface, under the jaded eyes of seeing humanity come up with worse and worse crimes against one another.
I realise those crimes have always taken place, it's just there is more indepth knowledge by more people after the fact these days. So trying to get the thread back on track, If a 100 pct DNA list in the UK had absoultely stopped what looks like a terrible crime, Would it have been worth it ? |
Re: Another abduction case... this time Wales.
Originally Posted by ozzieeagle
(Post 10310752)
Got to admit the DNA list, is a far more emotive subject than I first realised. I can understand why. I think it's possible as one gets older that the positives in what this would on the surface be trying to acheive comes more to the surface, under the jaded eyes of seeing humanity come up with worse and worse crimes against one another.
I realise those crimes have always taken place, it's just there is more indepth knowledge by more people after the fact these days. So trying to get the thread back on track, If a 100 pct DNA list in the UK had absoultely stopped what looks like a terrible crime, Would it be worth it ? |
Re: Another abduction case... this time Wales.
Many people are equally against CCTV and refer to it as 'Big Brother' stating that it infringes on their human rights and they should be able to go about their business without being watched.
CCTV does not bother me in the slightest and it has caught many a criminal and in the recent rape/murder case of that Irish girl, CCTV saved her family from possibly never finding out where she was buried, not to mention catching the culprit pretty quickly. |
Re: Another abduction case... this time Wales.
Originally Posted by ozzieeagle
(Post 10310752)
Got to admit the DNA list, is a far more emotive subject than I first realised. I can understand why. I think it's possible as one gets older that the positives in what this would on the surface be trying to acheive comes more to the surface, under the jaded eyes of seeing humanity come up with worse and worse crimes against one another.
I realise those crimes have always taken place, it's just there is more indepth knowledge by more people after the fact these days. So trying to get the thread back on track, If a 100 pct DNA list in the UK had absoultely stopped what looks like a terrible crime, Would it have been worth it ? Treating the entire population like criminals by forcing DNA samples from them will create a terrible resentment, anger, and a massive new wave of DNA-fraud crimes where false DNA samples are left at crime scenes to implicate other people, etc. |
Re: Another abduction case... this time Wales.
Originally Posted by Cheetah7
(Post 10310756)
Many people are equally against CCTV and refer to it as 'Big Brother' stating that it infringes on their human rights and they should be able to go about their business without being watched.
CCTV does not bother me in the slightest and it has caught many a criminal and in the recent rape/murder case of that Irish girl, CCTV saved her family from possibly never finding out where she was buried, not to mention catching the culprit pretty quickly. |
Re: Another abduction case... this time Wales.
Originally Posted by Zen10
(Post 10310760)
You could solve even more crimes if CCTV were installed in everyone's houses - would you agree to that?
Still this is getting away from the gist of the thread. Personally through my experienced eyes, if a DNA list had stopped just this one crime I would be for it. I've been toying with the idea of CCTV outside my house for a while now. Our local case has pushed me in that direction. The accused definitely knocked on a 19YO girls house down the road asking for local directions, which was a bullsheet excuse, luckily her BF was home at the time, she gave a statement to the Police before the arrest. I live on a road that leads to a very large park, plus across the road is a car park where things happen all the time... nothing bad in the time I've lived here though. Plus we have laneways out the back, Someone was attacked in the laneway up the top of the road from us about 5 years ago. Then there is the personal security factor as well. So I'm going for it. It's what Gill Meahgers mother asked for, so I'm happy to oblige. |
Re: Another abduction case... this time Wales.
Originally Posted by Zen10
(Post 10310760)
You could solve even more crimes if CCTV were installed in everyone's houses - would you agree to that?
Do you honestly believe we should have no CCTV? - none at all? I bet the family of Jill Meagher would beg to differ on that, the guy responsible for her death was identified and caught pretty quickly thanks to CCTV. |
Re: Another abduction case... this time Wales.
Originally Posted by ozzieeagle
(Post 10310768)
Your phone already is a listening device.... unless it's Voip and you dont have Mobiles switched on, with the batteries out.. Take fully your point about DNA being left at a crime scene, which I'll freely admit is probably the major negative that cancels it's effectiveness.... Surely that would be used to target/frame certain individuals and there would be safeguards developed against that, rather than pure evasion.
Still this is getting away from the gist of the thread. Personally through my experienced eyes, if a DNA list had stopped just this one crime I would be for it. I've been toying with the idea of CCTV outside my house for a while now. Our local case has pushed me in that direction. The accused definitely knocked on a 19YO girls house down the road asking for local directions, which was a bullsheet excuse, luckily her BF was home at the time, she gave a statement to the Police before the arrest. I live on a road that leads to a very large park, plus across the road is a car park where things happen all the time... nothing bad in the time I've lived here though. Plus we have laneways out the back, Someone was attacked in the laneway up the top of the road from us about 5 years ago. Then there is the personal security factor as well. So I'm going for it. It's what Gill Meahgers mother asked for, so I'm happy to oblige. This is still getting away from the gist of the thread. The thread isn't about the use of DNA & its moral implications, it's about a child being missing in Wales. |
Re: Another abduction case... this time Wales.
Originally Posted by Cheetah7
(Post 10310772)
No I dont but what is wrong with CCTV outside? It is not our right to break the law as we see fit, it has helped catch many a criminal and been used in court against them.
Do you honestly believe we should have no CCTV? I bet the family of Jill Meagher would beg to differ on that, the guy responsible for her death was identified and caught pretty quickly thanks to CCTV. |
Re: Another abduction case... this time Wales.
Lets hope there is some news on this little girl soon, I read that the cops are checking tyre marks by the river or something.
:( |
Re: Another abduction case... this time Wales.
Originally Posted by Cheetah7
(Post 10310777)
Lets hope there is some news on this little girl soon, I read that the cops are checking tyre marks by the river or something.
:( |
Re: Another abduction case... this time Wales.
Originally Posted by mrsgreenstar76
(Post 10310776)
It's well within our rights to break the law. However, we have to accept the consequences of that. I can choose whether I'm going to break the law or not. That is my decision & mine alone. I choose not to, and should be able to enjoy the freedoms of being a member of society in good standing. I shouldn't have to be treated with suspicion, like a potential criminal, as a reward of behaving lawfully.
The fact that it has helped a lot of people as in victims of crimes having their attackers caught, or families of victims etc, how is that a bad thing? |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 1:15 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.