![]() |
Americanisation of Austrlia
How Americanised has Australia become?
|
Re: Americanisation of Austrlia
Originally Posted by mackinnon
(Post 4911616)
How Americanised has Austrlia become?
Lots of things here remind me of the US...the roads, buildings, even some of the Aussies sound American;) |
Re: Americanisation of Austrlia
Originally Posted by mackinnon
(Post 4911616)
How Americanised has Austrlia become?
|
Re: Americanisation of Austrlia
Originally Posted by mackinnon
(Post 4911616)
How Americanised has Austrlia become?
In my part of the UK, the most commonly used Americanism is "Mom" instead of "Mum". That's something I never encountered back home. |
Re: Americanisation of Austrlia
Originally Posted by worzel
(Post 4911701)
I identify two factors. Firstly the size of the country and the heat (southern US at least) mean there are many similarities. Secondly, the Aussies got pissed off with the British using them as cannon fodder in the war etc and decided to throw their hand in with someone else. A bit of a generalisation but you get the point.
|
Re: Americanisation of Austrlia
Originally Posted by mackinnon
(Post 4911616)
How Americanised has Australia become?
|
Re: Americanisation of Austrlia
What I hate is the overuse of the word "Awesome" :curse:
|
Re: Americanisation of Austrlia
Originally Posted by worzel
(Post 4911701)
I identify two factors. Firstly the size of the country and the heat (southern US at least) mean there are many similarities. Secondly, the Aussies got pissed off with the British using them as cannon fodder in the war etc and decided to throw their hand in with someone else. A bit of a generalisation but you get the point.
|
Re: Americanisation of Austrlia
Originally Posted by worzel
(Post 4911701)
Secondly, the Aussies got pissed off with the British using them as cannon fodder in the war etc .
There is a romantic perception that Australian's went to war only to support Britain. Whilst there may be some element of truth in that, there was also apparently a lot of doing what was "right" and going for a sense of adventure - I suspect similar to the UK going to Iraq or Afghanistan or attacking Germany when Germany's sights were set on France in WW1 - hardly directly affecting the UK but soldiers and the forces doing what they believe to be 'right'. The misperception of the Brits pulling Australians over to do their dirty work, sent to their deaths by incompetent British generals and their losses being bigger than any other country have become folklore. Australians did not lose as many people in WW1 or WWII as the British - in absolute terms or as a percentage of their population. And it wasn't even about fighting someone else's war in someone else's theatre - particularly in WW2 (but also in WW1 given German possessions in the Pacific) when fighting often took place within Australia's sphere of influence. Some Aussies like to think that we should be permanently in gratitude to them for agreeing to fight for us in our war and dying for the British. |
Re: Americanisation of Austrlia
Originally Posted by Fleaflyfloflum
(Post 4911857)
PMSL :rofl: And you think the yanks wouldnt have?
|
Re: Americanisation of Austrlia
Originally Posted by Amazulu
(Post 4911906)
It is a generalisation because it never happened that way. In any war.
|
Re: Americanisation of Austrlia
Originally Posted by NKSK version 2
(Post 4911931)
I can't believe that this bullshit is still being touted around.
There is a romantic perception that Australian's went to war only to support Britain. Whilst there may be some element of truth in that, there was also apparently a lot of doing what was "right" and going for a sense of adventure - I suspect similar to the UK going to Iraq or Afghanistan or attacking Germany when Germany's sights were set on France in WW1 - hardly directly affecting the UK but soldiers and the forces doing what they believe to be 'right'. The misperception of the Brits pulling Australians over to do their dirty work, sent to their deaths by incompetent British generals and their losses being bigger than any other country have become folklore. Australians did not lose as many people in WW1 or WWII as the British - in absolute terms or as a percentage of their population. And it wasn't even about fighting someone else's war in someone else's theatre - particularly in WW2 (but also in WW1 given German possessions in the Pacific) when fighting often took place within Australia's sphere of influence. Some Aussies like to think that we should be permanently in gratitude to them for agreeing to fight for us in our war and dying for the British. Infact, if it hadn't been for the yanks we'd all be speaking Japanese nowadays. On that score The Americans deserve credit. And the Allies would also have lost WW2 if the Americans hadn't come to the party. |
Re: Americanisation of Austrlia
Originally Posted by worzel
(Post 4912002)
I was told that a few times when we were on our hols down here, but I have to admit I have not heard anything like that this time around. Maybe a better example would be that Whitlam / Fraser thing in the 70's where the UK monarchy disolved the Australian government. I can't even remember what that was about exactly but no wonder there is a strong pro-republican feeling.
|
Re: Americanisation of Austrlia
Originally Posted by worzel
(Post 4912002)
I was told that a few times when we were on our hols down here, but I have to admit I have not heard anything like that this time around. Maybe a better example would be that Whitlam / Fraser thing in the 70's where the UK monarchy disolved the Australian government. I can't even remember what that was about exactly but no wonder there is a strong pro-republican feeling.
|
Re: Americanisation of Austrlia
Originally Posted by kiwi_child
(Post 4912024)
What pissed Aussies and Kiwis off was that some useless whisky drinking generals in London farked it up at Gallipoli and that cost the lives of many, many ANZACS. Also in WW2, the UK Top Brass hassled the OZ PM (Curtin) to keep his men in the middle east theatre when they shoudl have been sent back to OZ to defend their home country.
Infact, if it hadn't been for the yanks we'd all be speaking Japanese nowadays. On that score The Americans deserve credit. And the Allies would also have lost WW2 if the Americans hadn't come to the party. Galipolli was a great idea but badly implemented. Churchill and his generals messed it up. Many Australian commanders sent their men on 'suicide' attacks. Few came out of the campaign with their repuatations intact. Curtin DID bring the 2 Aussie divisions home from the Middle East, despite the protests of Churchill and hsi generals. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 2:01 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.