Peter

Originally posted by MikeStanton
    > Whoa! What happened to
freedom of speech? Or is it only FOS if it fits within your (or
others) narrowly-defined limits? I 'love' self-appointed guardians who
feel they should determine what should be posted.
    >
    > Some don't want
reality to intrude on a dream. Tough - some want to know more fact or
experience than fairytale.
    >
    > As far as I recall, Kong doesn't insult
- unless somebody else begins it.
    >
    > In between the positive and
negative views about Oz/UK lies the 'truth' - and even that varies for
each individual.
    >
    > Unless the post is defamatory or totally
unrelated to Oz-UK issues, why shouldn't it be posted? It may be useful
to someone.
    >
    > If you don't like it, don't read it.

Another
clown who thinks freedom of speech exists on a privately owned website.


Hint: it doesn't. So get over yourself and lose the idea that you can
say and do what you like here.


--
Posted via http://britishexpats.com

HiddenPaw

Originally posted by Ulujain
    > Get over yourself and
lose the idea that you can say and do what you like here.
You
still riled after the moderator deleted one of your posts yesterday
Ulujain? :p


--
Posted via http://britishexpats.com

Peter

Originally posted by HiddenPaw
    > You still riled after
the moderator deleted one of your posts yesterday Ulujain? :p


Wasn't riled to begin with. Amused is a word more appropriate.
Considering whoever it was that deleted my post, yet kept the quoted
replies, sort of made it a moot point to do it, didn't it? ;)

Proves
my point though, doesn't it? If you expect free speech rights on a forum
owned and operated by private individuals, then you're possibly in for a
shock.

Still, it's all very trivial.


--
Posted via http://britishexpats.com