Who has better flight attendents, BA, Virgin or Qantas
#1
Just Joined
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10
Who has better flight attendents, BA, Virgin or Qantas
Which carrier has better flight attendants BA, Virgin or Qantas
#2
Re: Who has better flight attendents, BA, Virgin or Qantas
Originally Posted by jumjum
Which carrier has better flight attendants BA, Virgin or Qantas
#3
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,027
Re: Who has better flight attendents, BA, Virgin or Qantas
Flew Virgin in 1987 so a long time ago but couldn't fault the staff. Travelled quite a lot with BA and the staff can vary from very polite and helpful to damn right rude!
#4
Forum Regular
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 106
Re: Who has better flight attendents, BA, Virgin or Qantas
Originally Posted by jumjum
Which carrier has better flight attendants BA, Virgin or Qantas
#5
Re: Who has better flight attendents, BA, Virgin or Qantas
Originally Posted by Chalkfarm
Have flown all three and would never dream of flying with BA again, they are so rude and if you ask for anything it is such an effort.Qantas and virgin are all friendly and always so helpfull when you have children.!
#6
Re: Who has better flight attendents, BA, Virgin or Qantas
have flown with virgin ( to the states tho not oz) & have to say they were fantastic - i have 3 boys & nothing was too much trouble for them - it was a night flight & the plane was 1/2 empty so the attendant gave the boys 3 seats each to lay down on
would be my first choice- especially if i was taking kids (but no flights to perth )
pootle
would be my first choice- especially if i was taking kids (but no flights to perth )
pootle
#7
Re: Who has better flight attendents, BA, Virgin or Qantas
Have flown with BA to LA and Quantas from LA to Sydney, Quantas staff on our flight were older and more friendlier nothing was a problem. We travelled with three older children and they thought of everything. I would definitely recommend flying with Quantas.
Marie
Marie
#8
Forum Regular
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 57
Re: Who has better flight attendents, BA, Virgin or Qantas
Originally Posted by fraser
So it's not just me that BA were rude to
AJ
#9
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: To the world you are one person...to one person you may be the world
Posts: 873
Re: Who has better flight attendents, BA, Virgin or Qantas
Originally Posted by Vanessa
Travelled quite a lot with BA and the staff can vary from very polite and helpful to damn right rude!
I'm an ex-BA employee (not a trolley-dolly, ground staff and a little more behind the scenes than check-in although I've done my time there). The no. of times I'd cringe when listening to colleagues dealing with either our passengers or other airline passengers who just needed a little guidance/direction around the airport. However, it was well known amongst the folk I worked with that standards varied worldwide.
My experience with Qantas has been that they're very similar to BA ie large company and therefore suffer the same problem as above. However the Aussie customer service is far superior to the British so this generally gives the QF chaps an edge.
Virgin has a completely different work ethic and work culture. Branson can't stand BA and tries to be everything BA isn't, ie, a fun, young airline but still maintaining the safety aspect obviously. Mr Logan's dad's worked for years with them, as does Mr Logan's brother, and they deem it a good company to work for. Not many say that about BA these days, let me assure you.
And from Monday, Mr Logan starts his new job with Virgin Blue....so I'm just chuffed we get our concessions again!!
#10
Banned
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47
Re: Who has better flight attendents, BA, Virgin or Qantas
BA = A Big A.ses
QANTAS = good in bed
Virgin = Liars
QANTAS = good in bed
Virgin = Liars
#11
Re: Who has better flight attendents, BA, Virgin or Qantas
Originally Posted by logan
Good point, and personally I reckon that's what happens when you have a large company. You can try as hard as you like to provide the same service and standards every time a member of staff comes in contact with the public, but it's very hard to ensure that this is occuring...especially worldwide.
I'm an ex-BA employee (not a trolley-dolly, ground staff and a little more behind the scenes than check-in although I've done my time there). The no. of times I'd cringe when listening to colleagues dealing with either our passengers or other airline passengers who just needed a little guidance/direction around the airport. However, it was well known amongst the folk I worked with that standards varied worldwide.
My experience with Qantas has been that they're very similar to BA ie large company and therefore suffer the same problem as above. However the Aussie customer service is far superior to the British so this generally gives the QF chaps an edge.
Virgin has a completely different work ethic and work culture. Branson can't stand BA and tries to be everything BA isn't, ie, a fun, young airline but still maintaining the safety aspect obviously. Mr Logan's dad's worked for years with them, as does Mr Logan's brother, and they deem it a good company to work for. Not many say that about BA these days, let me assure you.
And from Monday, Mr Logan starts his new job with Virgin Blue....so I'm just chuffed we get our concessions again!!
I'm an ex-BA employee (not a trolley-dolly, ground staff and a little more behind the scenes than check-in although I've done my time there). The no. of times I'd cringe when listening to colleagues dealing with either our passengers or other airline passengers who just needed a little guidance/direction around the airport. However, it was well known amongst the folk I worked with that standards varied worldwide.
My experience with Qantas has been that they're very similar to BA ie large company and therefore suffer the same problem as above. However the Aussie customer service is far superior to the British so this generally gives the QF chaps an edge.
Virgin has a completely different work ethic and work culture. Branson can't stand BA and tries to be everything BA isn't, ie, a fun, young airline but still maintaining the safety aspect obviously. Mr Logan's dad's worked for years with them, as does Mr Logan's brother, and they deem it a good company to work for. Not many say that about BA these days, let me assure you.
And from Monday, Mr Logan starts his new job with Virgin Blue....so I'm just chuffed we get our concessions again!!
Kala
#12
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 582
Re: Who has better flight attendents, BA, Virgin or Qantas
Originally Posted by JayDeee
I'm also an Ex Virgin employee (not front line, I worked in Engineering buying all the inflight entertainment, seats etc etc)
I've worked for two of the airlines mentioned and have a lot of friends who work for the third and I'd say none of the above.
The BA staff will act like they are doing you a favour by allowing you to fly on their aircraft, and god help you if you dare to do anything other than sit down and shut up.
Virgin service is good, their IFE is well ahead of the opposition but the seat pitch in economy is v poor, (BA 31", Virgin 29", Qantas 31", United 32", Emirates 32", Thai 33")
Qantas can be very like BA or can be very good, as someone else mentioned it will depend on the crew on the day.
After getting what amounted to a mouthful of abuse on a BA flight for asking for a glass of water I've used United to fly LHR-SFO-SYD twice a year for the last four years and can't fault them.
Excellent service right from checkin, friendly knowledgable staff, excellent in flight service/food. Apart from my first two trips I got upgraded to business on every occasion for the LHR to SFO leg (Sydney flight is always packed), their frequent flyer scheme is way superior to the BA/Qantas/Cathay One World scheme which is designed for big business travellers. On United (or any other Star Alliance carrier) one return to Aus will give you a silver card which allows you to sit in front of cabin, exit rows or where fitted Premier Economy with 35-36" seat pitch. Two flights in a year will give you a gold card which gives full lounge access too.
It only cost me 30000 airmiles to upgrade from a full fare economy to business when I emigrated (£1800 vs £6000).
And finally the best bit they have always been at least £2-300 cheaper than Bad Airways. Off peak I got a return to Sydney with them for £599 last year, BA were quoting £894 for their cheapest fare.
If you want a quote for United ring Flight Centre Direct, they have a special deal with United and usually have the cheapest fares available.
#13
Re: Who has better flight attendents, BA, Virgin or Qantas
Dont like the sound of BA at all from this thread, and am getting worried, I'm booked on flight QF387, Qantas flight operated by BA, Does that mean I'm getting BA flight Attendants ?
If so I'd best not drink dammit, I'd go loopy if someone gave me some lip after forking out 7,000 grand.
If so I'd best not drink dammit, I'd go loopy if someone gave me some lip after forking out 7,000 grand.
#14
Forum Regular
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 101
Re: Who has better flight attendents, BA, Virgin or Qantas
We flew with BA & Quantas and had no problems with them at all. The staff were friendly and helpful on both airlines and both were very good with our young son. Quantas were excellent with their spirit measures. We asked for a pre-dinner gin and tonic and not joking we got about 2/3's of a tumbler full of gin.
Theresa
Theresa
#15
BE Forum Addict
Joined: May 2005
Location: Mornington
Posts: 1,650
Re: Who has better flight attendents, BA, Virgin or Qantas
Originally Posted by jumjum
Which carrier has better flight attendants BA, Virgin or Qantas
John