Viscount Monckton of Brenchley scolds Rudd
#31
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,054
Re: Viscount Monckton of Brenchley scolds Rudd
If you graduated from an Australian primary school you would now be able to perform the simple calculation.
#32
Account Closed
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,188
Re: Viscount Monckton of Brenchley scolds Rudd
Forget it mate. You have become such a tedious, one trick pony, that I'm going to do what I have only done once before in all the time I've been on BE. I'm going to put you on my ignore list.
#33
Just Joined
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: Sunshine Coast. QLD
Posts: 28
Re: Viscount Monckton of Brenchley scolds Rudd
The only reason an Australian primary school kid would be able to calculate that, is because they all carry a laptop to school. I know none of our apprentices could calculate that. Most can't do up their own shoe laces without help from mummy.
#34
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,054
Re: Viscount Monckton of Brenchley scolds Rudd
As an aside: Why would you take on such incompetent apprentices?
#35
Re: Viscount Monckton of Brenchley scolds Rudd
That bloke looks like a cross between Marty Feldman and Tony Benn
#36
Just Joined
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: Sunshine Coast. QLD
Posts: 28
Re: Viscount Monckton of Brenchley scolds Rudd
I wouldn't myself. That's the responsibility of my Australian boss. "The price you pay for living on the coast" is the constant reply you'll get around these parts. Born and bred Queenslanders. And if you're smart, you would't be entering into a manual trade these days anyway. Oh well, no one's perfect.
#37
Re: Viscount Monckton of Brenchley scolds Rudd
I have the advantage of knowing the mathematical ability of certain other Brits so I know that at least a few are not as ignorant and stupid as you would have me believe.
Wol's equations are not relevant to the calculation which has been simplified by the IPCC to just what it considers to be the relevant terms:
dT = (4.7 ± 1) ln(C/C0)
which requires the 3 simple operations of division, logorithm, multiplication which is within the capability of upper primary schools kids.
Wol's equations are not relevant to the calculation which has been simplified by the IPCC to just what it considers to be the relevant terms:
dT = (4.7 ± 1) ln(C/C0)
which requires the 3 simple operations of division, logorithm, multiplication which is within the capability of upper primary schools kids.
Critics of the IPCC would say that, since they (the IPCC) have done the reduction of the equations they must be suspect.
This sort of argument is extremely common in the AGW debate, and is probably the reason that the scientists involved are increasingly avoiding getting into the discussion.
At some point in any argument the specialists see little gain in repeating the same highly complex answers when the opposition immediately goes on to another denial without rebutting them.
I believe it was Bertrand Russell who cut to the chase on this: he said, IIRC, that because it was impossible to disprove his (an) assertion that there was a little pink teapot in orbit around the sun some might say that it was true. Those who denied it would at some stage give up trying to argue their side - it is a waste of their time. I think the same thing has happened in the AGW field.
#38
Account Closed
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 546
Re: Viscount Monckton of Brenchley scolds Rudd
OK, so we accept that its all the fault of humanity. Now what?.
Do you seriously believe, for one second, that we will accept that we have to 'turn the lights off' permanently?. That we will be prevented from flying because planes emit too much greenhouse gas?. That people in third world will except that they won't be allowed to develop because it will 'make the planet warmer'?.
Not a bloody hope.
Do you seriously believe, for one second, that we will accept that we have to 'turn the lights off' permanently?. That we will be prevented from flying because planes emit too much greenhouse gas?. That people in third world will except that they won't be allowed to develop because it will 'make the planet warmer'?.
Not a bloody hope.
I also think we have to learn to live with it ... It will cause problems.... because most people couldn't care less about preventing it.
#40
Re: Viscount Monckton of Brenchley scolds Rudd
My daughter graduated from an Australian primary and confimed to me just now that they didn't go near logarithms in Primary. End of Year 8 and onwards. Maybe they have a different curriculum for Citizen by Descent Australians than they do for True Blue dyed in the blood Australians.
#41
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,054
Re: Viscount Monckton of Brenchley scolds Rudd
My daughter graduated from an Australian primary and confimed to me just now that they didn't go near logarithms in Primary. End of Year 8 and onwards. Maybe they have a different curriculum for Citizen by Descent Australians than they do for True Blue dyed in the blood Australians.
#42
Re: Viscount Monckton of Brenchley scolds Rudd
Apparently her grade six and seven teachers were both as Australian as you suggest you are. She wasn't there prior to that but none of the kids learnt it. I did ask if she had seen their genealogical tree to confirm that the two teachers were Australian but she admitted failure on that part.
#43
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,054
Re: Viscount Monckton of Brenchley scolds Rudd
Apparently her grade six and seven teachers were both as Australian as you suggest you are. She wasn't there prior to that but none of the kids learnt it. I did ask if she had seen their genealogical tree to confirm that the two teachers were Australian but she admitted failure on that part.
OK, perhaps you are right and the young today are a year or two slower and stay at school longer to make up for it. Still no excuse for any adult not be able to perform the simple 3 step arithmetic above.
#44
Re: Viscount Monckton of Brenchley scolds Rudd
>>OK, perhaps you are right and the young today are a year or two slower and stay at school longer to make up for it. Still no excuse for any adult not be able to perform the simple 3 step arithmetic above.<<
You really don't get it, do you?
You really don't get it, do you?