![]() |
Posts removed from 457 thread
Originally Posted by upyerfud
(Post 10171419)
To suggest companies who employ hundreds of thousands of highly taxed employees should contribute to the country is about the stupidest remark I've seen on this forum for a long time. Their taxes, both personal and corporate, and mining royalties are all thats keeping the country going at the moment.
Almost beaten by thinking that 457 workers are cheaper than locals. |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Most of the comments i have seen about the protests are aimed at and these are not my words but I quote "gooks and curry munchers". So maybe people are being given the impression that 457 visas are going to be given on masse to people from Asia??
|
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by boots
(Post 10171592)
Very simple,
Why pay a "Local" say $XYZ when you can have 2 or 3 457 Visa holders for the same price? Why worry about when the worker is permanantly injured?No costs Why worry if any of your workers speak up on safety etc?Easy ,replace them with workers too scared to complain. Why try and cheat workers out of their Contract/Agreed/Law wage?Easy way around it is employ 457 employees only. And they are not paid the same as Australians. Fact. The Racist tag,,so easily used by those too lazy to think:frown: Ever wonder why USA is in the doldrums? Or was that racist outsourcing their industries and bring in "CHEAP" Overseas labour to further lower the American economy. I seem to remember the vast majority of British sqeaking,moaning etc when their nation was flooded by cheap Polish workers,and before that Indian and Pakis. Look how great England is today. There is enough wealth and prosperity for ALL Australians to enjoy without lowering our standard of living to a Third World Nation:thumbup: |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by desert-rat
(Post 10171589)
Most of the comments i have seen about the protests are aimed at and these are not my words but I quote *Snipped*. So maybe people are being given the impression that 457 visas are going to be given on masse to people from Asia??
Originally Posted by boots
(Post 10171592)
Very simple,
Why pay a "Local" say $XYZ when you can have 2 or 3 457 Visa holders for the same price? Why worry about when the worker is permanantly injured?No costs Why worry if any of your workers speak up on safety etc?Easy ,replace them with workers too scared to complain. Why try and cheat workers out of their Contract/Agreed/Law wage?Easy way around it is employ 457 employees only. And they are not paid the same as Australians. Fact. The Racist tag,,so easily used by those too lazy to think:frown: Ever wonder why USA is in the doldrums? Or was that racist outsourcing their industries and bring in "CHEAP" Overseas labour to further lower the American economy. I seem to remember the vast majority of British sqeaking,moaning etc when their nation was flooded by cheap Polish workers,and before that Indian and *Snipped*. Look how great England is today. There is enough wealth and prosperity for ALL Australians to enjoy without lowering our standard of living to a Third World Nation:thumbup:
Originally Posted by boots
(Post 10171649)
I was replying on the basis of using White Australia policy,Racism etc in the above posts.
It is a confirmed concern,I know personally,how the"457 System" operates. This isn't in regards to Proffesional careers 457 Visa's. Lets say Gina R.,a large Mine owner,wants to make more money-fair call as thats why anyone is in business. The company requires ,say 350 workers,for their Big Dirt Mine in Upper Kumbukaa West. They advertise for a Truck Operator with First Aid,Logistics etc etc qualifications.I apply and get an auto generated ,if any at all,rejection. MMmmmm,I have Para-Medic qualifications,so tick on the 1st aid,have MC(Road Trains,Tippers + all types of other heavy machinary tickets etc-again tick,have extensive remote Desert work experience here and in USA/Mexico,have a Diploma in Logistics Management-But I am not qualified enough to operate a small truck in a straight line!!!True story!!! I know of an Engineer in Brisbane in the same boat!!!! So Mining Company goes back to Government persons dealing with "Labour Shortage" and pleads their case,Labour Minister scared of Mining Company rubber stamps 457 for UNSKILLED LABOURERS ,whilst decreeing he is doing all he can to alleviate the LABOUR SHORTAGE. And the person saying that companies have to pay the 457 Visa Holder the equiv. wage?:rofl::rofl: Why do you think a lot of jobs are only advertised in New Zealand or China and escp.The Philippines? Why was the Irish Man killed on a building site rigging when his 457 Visa was for a highly qualified Engineer? The Racist tag,,so easily used by those too lazy to think I agree with Tramps_mate. You've provided no evidence & you just sound incredibly bitter because someone else got the job & you didn't. |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by mrsgreenstar76
(Post 10171762)
I don't care if you are quoting or not, that language isn't appropriate on here. Please don't repeat it. :sneaky:
I have heard that argument so many times in the UK it's not even funny. Person X can't get a job & so it's the fault of the immigrants. You're complaining that: Yet the people who make those kinds of arguments usually are racist. You've shown no evidence for your assertions. Would you care to back up your claims? Oh, and please avoid using racist language when/if you do so. I've edited it from the quote in my post, in case you're wondering which bit I'm referring to. :sneaky: I agree with Tramps_mate. You've provided no evidence & you just sound incredibly bitter because someone else got the job & you didn't. http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/employers-...725-1hx98.html I have personal experience at it,and no, as being a tad more intelligent won't fall for the libel trap.Will freely provide examples.,etc offline.. So I am a racist?????Where was my language Racist?? Based on what evidence? That's a big call:rofl::rofl: Re-Read my post,:thumbsup::thumbsup: |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by mrsgreenstar76
(Post 10171762)
I don't care if you are quoting or not, that language isn't appropriate on here. Please don't repeat it. :sneaky:
I have heard that argument so many times in the UK it's not even funny. Person X can't get a job & so it's the fault of the immigrants. You're complaining that: Yet the people who make those kinds of arguments usually are racist. You've shown no evidence for your assertions. Would you care to back up your claims? Oh, and please avoid using racist language when/if you do so. I've edited it from the quote in my post, in case you're wondering which bit I'm referring to. :sneaky: I agree with Tramps_mate. You've provided no evidence & you just sound incredibly bitter because someone else got the job & you didn't.
Originally Posted by boots
(Post 10171799)
Took me 0.0005 sec and this is a random selection of the 457 Visa system being used to "Exploit and Underpay" those involved;
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/employers-...725-1hx98.html I have personal experience at it,and no, as being a tad more intelligent won't fall for the libel trap.Will freely provide examples.,etc offline.. So I am a racist?????Where was my language Racist?? Based on what evidence? That's a big call:rofl::rofl: Re-Read my post,:thumbsup::thumbsup: As for your "evidence", a link that is over a year old complaining that 457 employers have avoided sanctions hardly cuts it. I take it you haven't noticed whilst you're having your rage fit about "DEY TERK OOR JERBS!", that (as mentioned above) employers have recently been taken to court and fined for underpaying workers. |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Haha! Not seen that one for years!
Dey terk er jeerbs!!! Derk a der!!! :) |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by Tramps_mate
(Post 10171841)
Haha! Not seen that one for years!
Dey terk er jeerbs!!! Derk a der!!! :) |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by mrsgreenstar76
(Post 10171844)
:D
Understanding comprehension is out of grasp to a few people with agendas:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl: Facts are facts. Why the need to belittle people that are stating facts and opinion is beyond me. Its OK,know where you are coming from, Trying to have a sensible debate,but,,,, |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by boots
(Post 10171862)
OK,:rofl::rofl::rofl:
Understanding comprehension is out of grasp to a few people with agendas:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl: Facts are facts. Why the need to belittle people that are stating facts and opinion is beyond me. Its OK,know where you are coming from, Trying to have a sensible debate,but,,,, |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by mrsgreenstar76
(Post 10171873)
Stating "fact" after something doesn't automatically make it so. I think your agenda is fairly clear. I don't see how you think you are going to have a sensible debate when your point comes down to "I'm bitter because another person got the job I wanted. I know, it's because of cheaper immigrants. It can't be me at all."
:rofl::rofl::rofl: Might try something other than selective quotes and answer all my questions instead of ranting on a few lines of my post:rofl::rofl::rofl: :thumbsup::thumbsup: Try and be non-subjective sometimes:thumbup: |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by boots
(Post 10172713)
:rofl::rofl::rofl:
Might try something other than selective quotes and answer all my questions instead of ranting on a few lines of my post:rofl::rofl::rofl: :thumbsup::thumbsup: Try and be non-subjective sometimes:thumbup: You have based your entire argument on your experience of failing to get a job & your unsubstantiated theory as to why that occurred. The fact that that is extremely subjective seems to have flown right over your head. :rolleyes: |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by mrsgreenstar76
(Post 10172755)
"Kettle, this is Pot. You're black!"
You have based your entire argument on your experience of failing to get a job & your unsubstantiated theory as to why that occurred. The fact that that is extremely subjective seems to have flown right over your head. :rolleyes: AHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhh, OK,I will make this even easy,simple,understanding etc for you. Re-read my post and comprehend my statement/comment/Point of view etc. I have used an example to substantiate my view,but you have decided to use selective nit-picking,which I find :rofl:. Hey:D:eek: You keep retorting and dig a bigger hole in which to extricate yourself:thumbup:,be my guest:lol::lol: |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
OK Truce mrsgreenstar76???
I won't comment any further if you don't.:thumbup: |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by boots
(Post 10172810)
AHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhh,
OK,I will make this even easy,simple,understanding etc for you. Re-read my post and comprehend my statement/comment/Point of view etc. I have used an example to substantiate my view,but you have decided to use selective nit-picking,which I find :rofl:. Hey:D:eek: You keep retorting and dig a bigger hole in which to extricate yourself:thumbup:,be my guest:lol::lol: |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by boots
(Post 10172811)
OK Truce mrsgreenstar76???
I won't comment any further if you don't.:thumbup: |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
:yield:
Originally Posted by mrsgreenstar76
(Post 10172859)
Feel free to stop responding if you like. It makes not one iota of difference to me either way.
:) |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by eddie007
(Post 10172877)
:yield:
i think winter footwear was looking for :yield: this smilie :) |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
:huh:
:) ;) :D :nod: :starsmile: So Cliche in "Read between the lines" I like smilies;:o:thumbsup::frown::ohmy: |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by boots
(Post 10172922)
:huh:
:) ;) :D :nod: :starsmile: So Cliche in "Read between the lines" I like smilies;:o:thumbsup::frown::ohmy: |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
SOOooooo,
Mrsgreenstar76 how about a coffee and chat @ a Cafe to settle our differences? |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by boots
(Post 10172931)
SOOooooo,
Mrsgreenstar76 how about a coffee and chat @ a Cafe to settle our differences? |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Mmmmmmm,yeah.
Hey at least we tried!!! Maybe next thread:starsmile: |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
I think there is some hypocrisy on this thread with some saying you can quote and some saying you can't and yet quoting themselves.
I am extremely disillusioned with some aspects of BE posters statements on here, not sure if they are moderators or not but their sheer arrogance is staining what was once a good board. Let people vent, then try and assist them, not shout them down or be arrogant just because YOU think you know best. |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by paddyo
(Post 10174193)
I think there is some hypocrisy on this thread with some saying you can quote and some saying you can't and yet quoting themselves.
I am extremely disillusioned with some aspects of BE posters statements on here, not sure if they are moderators or not but their sheer arrogance is staining what was once a good board. Let people vent, then try and assist them, not shout them down or be arrogant just because YOU think you know best. |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
But that's just it....I think posts SHOULD have a degree of openness and latitude. Sometimes a word or phrase which is possibly not acceptable in SOME peoples repertoire is needed on here to provide an example of what the poster is trying to explain, especially if they are quoting a reported remark and even more especially if it is from the media.
I agree with not being rude, but then an ASSUMPTION of rudeness based on misunderstanding or not reading their words makes things worse. Shouting them down does not help, in fact it is quite possible the most unhelpful thing you can do. |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
I'm not exactly sure what this argument is about but it would be good if it could get back on track as to whether the 457 system is being abused by empoyers.
The offensive phrase in one of the early posts ""gooks and curry munchers" is NOT to be used on BE - it causes offence, and is totally unnecessary. Beyond that, disagree with each other by all means, just do it politely and within the rules :) |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by mrsgreenstar76
(Post 10171810)
Since you're having difficulty with comprehension, I've highlighted the section of my post which indicates where you were using inappropriate terms. I've even highlighted it in red to make it easier for you. ;)
As for your "evidence", a link that is over a year old complaining that 457 employers have avoided sanctions hardly cuts it. I take it you haven't noticed whilst you're having your rage fit about "DEY TERK OOR JERBS!", that (as mentioned above) employers have recently been taken to court and fined for underpaying workers. Now when I first came over here I always thought the term Paki was racist and even stated so on here. But, reading it on the back pages of Newspapers here (usually aroind the cricket season!!), hearing it on the radio and TV and the retorts I got on here from other ex pats was that IN AUSTRALIA its use is as an abbreviation of Pakistani, understandable I suppose. So, where in Australia is it offensive to say Paki as a racist or inappropriate comment? Bear in mind I am saying IN AUSTRALIA, that's where we all live now isn't it? Isn't POM an abbreviation as well? Isn't Yank a term we all use yet some Americans find offensive? The reason I am bringing this up is because to call someone racist or to 'warn' them of racial or offensive or inappropriate terms you have to ensure that in their environment it IS classed as such. Oh, as a caveat I don't use the term but that's through years of knowing it as offensive in the UK because of its aggressive intonement but when Ozzies use it (oh hold on, is that offensive to some Australians because it is a poor abbreviation??) I no longer look on aghast. WHO defines it as inappropriate and is this subjective or from a list of recognised 'non use' terms. I know that sometimes I can be somewhat mischievous and throw a remark or comment in for effect, but this is a genuine comment. Oh, for the OP I think the anti 457 stuff is merely scaremongering by some people who should know better and playing to the ignorant minority. Some people are fearful for their jobs and so are reacting to a few choice words by ill advised politicians and local union guys. |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by paddyo
(Post 10174412)
This is a genuine question and comment.
Now when I first came over here I always thought the term Paki was racist and even stated so on here. But, reading it on the back pages of Newspapers here (usually aroind the cricket season!!), hearing it on the radio and TV and the retorts I got on here from other ex pats was that IN AUSTRALIA its use is as an abbreviation of Pakistani, understandable I suppose. So, where in Australia is it offensive to say Paki as a racist or inappropriate comment? Bear in mind I am saying IN AUSTRALIA, that's where we all live now isn't it? Isn't POM an abbreviation as well? Isn't Yank a term we all use yet some Americans find offensive? The reason I am bringing this up is because to call someone racist or to 'warn' them of racial or offensive or inappropriate terms you have to ensure that in their environment it IS classed as such. Oh, as a caveat I don't use the term but that's through years of knowing it as offensive in the UK because of its aggressive intonement but when Ozzies use it (oh hold on, is that offensive to some Australians because it is a poor abbreviation??) I no longer look on aghast. WHO defines it as inappropriate and is this subjective or from a list of recognised 'non use' terms. I know that sometimes I can be somewhat mischievous and throw a remark or comment in for effect, but this is a genuine comment. Oh, for the OP I think the anti 457 stuff is merely scaremongering by some people who should know better and playing to the ignorant minority. Some people are fearful for their jobs and so are reacting to a few choice words by ill advised politicians and local union guys. Now, as Pollyana has requested, let's stay on topic. |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by mrsgreenstar76
(Post 10174434)
Becoming immune to a word through hearing it repeatedly doesn't mean that the word becomes acceptable. I know plenty of Australians that wouldn't use the term. If people are describing Pakistanis, why not use the whole word? There are plenty of times where the word isn't being used in the traditional sense, as it's become a catch all derogatory word for asian. I personally don't use the term "Y**k" as I do have a lot of American friends & it's something that they find offensive. I wouldn't be offended if someone called me a pom, but I know that there are others that would be.
Now, as Pollyana has requested, let's stay on topic. IMO the topic is based upon peoples perception of reasoning behind a 457 and its 'possible' impact in WA due to Gina Rineharts deal with the Federal government. The 'white australia' aspect of it is down to the language used and how a word, a statement or a an implied phrase can change the whole meaning of someones words. During the course of this topic you decided to berate someone for using Paki and my question, a genuine question, is WHERE is this down as being racist or inappropiate when it IS commonly used in public media in Australia? |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by paddyo
(Post 10174593)
But this is part of the topic surely???
IMO the topic is based upon peoples perception of reasoning behind a 457 and its 'possible' impact in WA due to Gina Rineharts deal with the Federal government. The 'white australia' aspect of it is down to the language used and how a word, a statement or a an implied phrase can change the whole meaning of someones words. During the course of this topic you decided to berate someone for using Paki and my question, a genuine question, is WHERE is this down as being racist or inappropiate when it IS commonly used in public media in Australia? |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by paddyo
(Post 10174593)
But this is part of the topic surely???
IMO the topic is based upon peoples perception of reasoning behind a 457 and its 'possible' impact in WA due to Gina Rineharts deal with the Federal government. The 'white australia' aspect of it is down to the language used and how a word, a statement or a an implied phrase can change the whole meaning of someones words. During the course of this topic you decided to berate someone for using Paki and my question, a genuine question, is WHERE is this down as being racist or inappropiate when it IS commonly used in public media in Australia? |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by mrsgreenstar76
(Post 10174629)
I've already answered your question. It isn't really on topic. You might be happy enough to use the word, but where would you draw the line? Is it only when you are offended? Do you not consider the effect of your words upon others before you use them, or is that unimportant because you don't find it offensive?
I stated that I do NOT use the term due to my upbringing in UK. So you DO NOT read peoples posts before you start giving them grief. Just what is the point of you contributing to these forums if all your posts are berating others wrongly and then being defensive when taken to task for it? My genuine question has not been answered, WHO decides what IS or IS NOT appropriate?? I appreciate it is not easy, but I would always caution against taking others to task for something which can be very subjective. You are so single minded and so self believing that what YOU say is correct that you give no consideration to others, you offer no help, you have nothing positive to give to people asking for help. I said it before and I say it again, why on earth do you do it? Whats wrong with you? |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by paddyo
(Post 10174674)
Well, now you have totally qualified my earlier post.
I stated that I do NOT use the term due to my upbringing in UK. So you DO NOT read peoples posts before you start giving them grief. Just what is the point of you contributing to these forums if all your posts are berating others wrongly and then being defensive when taken to task for it? My genuine question has not been answered, WHO decides what IS or IS NOT appropriate?? I appreciate it is not easy, but I would always caution against taking others to task for something which can be very subjective. You are so single minded and so self believing that what YOU say is correct that you give no consideration to others, you offer no help, you have nothing positive to give to people asking for help. I said it before and I say it again, why on earth do you do it? Whats wrong with you? As for who decides what is offensive, any individual can decide something is offensive. In BEs case, there are site rules (which I'm seriously doubting you've bothered to read) which dictate what can & cannot be posted. You can knock off the personal attacks too. That is certainly against BE posting rules. |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by paddyo
(Post 10174674)
Well, now you have totally qualified my earlier post.
I stated that I do NOT use the term due to my upbringing in UK. So you DO NOT read peoples posts before you start giving them grief. Just what is the point of you contributing to these forums if all your posts are berating others wrongly and then being defensive when taken to task for it? My genuine question has not been answered, WHO decides what IS or IS NOT appropriate?? I appreciate it is not easy, but I would always caution against taking others to task for something which can be very subjective. You are so single minded and so self believing that what YOU say is correct that you give no consideration to others, you offer no help, you have nothing positive to give to people asking for help. I said it before and I say it again, why on earth do you do it? Whats wrong with you? As to your question, WE decide what is appropriate and what is not, based on the site rules which I suggest you take a moment to read :);) Moderators have opinions too, you know! |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by Mitzyboy
(Post 10174792)
If you feel you have a grievance with moderation on these forums then I suggest you take it up privately rather than make a personal attack on the forum. (Incidentally, a breach of two site rules)
As to your question, WE decide what is appropriate and what is not, based on the site rules which I suggest you take a moment to read :);) Moderators have opinions too, you know! I will accept the personal attack but that was based on the sheer frustration at mrsgreenstar76's continual negative assumptions of others. By all means Mitzyboy stand up for a fellow moderator but when you do so ensure that you are doing so out of fairness and not misguided loyalty. I am not the only one who has noticed mrsgreenstar76's attitude on this post and others and have had private messages to that effect. Look closely, read closely and DO NOT make incorrect assumptions about me because now YOU TWO are making a personal attack on my intelligence. You can give but not take......now thats not very Moderator of you is it? Oh, and the 'WE will decide' is an absolute cop out. We all think different and act different but if we do not know how YOU treat life then how can WE act on your lack of guidance? |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by mrsgreenstar76
(Post 10174688)
I did read your post actually, and you're one to talk with jumping into threads with a purely aggressive attitude & a determination to be right - without even considering that you might not be.
As for who decides what is offensive, any individual can decide something is offensive. In BEs case, there are site rules (which I'm seriously doubting you've bothered to read) which dictate what can & cannot be posted. You can knock off the personal attacks too. That is certainly against BE posting rules. |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by paddyo
(Post 10174864)
Right, both of you have made a grave error in assuming that I did NOT read the site rules, I specifically DID read them before answering them because, AS I KEEP ASKING they are not confined enough to provide guidance.
I will accept the personal attack but that was based on the sheer frustration at mrsgreenstar76's continual negative assumptions of others. By all means Mitzyboy stand up for a fellow moderator but when you do so ensure that you are doing so out of fairness and not misguided loyalty. I am not the only one who has noticed mrsgreenstar76's attitude on this post and others and have had private messages to that effect. Look closely, read closely and DO NOT make incorrect assumptions about me because now YOU TWO are making a personal attack on my intelligence. You can give but not take......now thats not very Moderator of you is it? Oh, and the 'WE will decide' is an absolute cop out. We all think different and act different but if we do not know how YOU treat life then how can WE act on your lack of guidance? We all know terms that are likely to cause offence. We also at times use terms we don't consider offensive but someone else might. If we take time to consider what we say before we say it, it would be better for all. If in doubt - don't say it. |
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
I agree...I apologise to those on this thread who have genuinely tried to contribute and assist the OP. I should not have let my frustrations with one poster drag this thread down, I am sorry to all.
|
Re: Anti 457 visa protest
Originally Posted by paddyo
(Post 10174888)
I agree...I apologise to those on this thread who have genuinely tried to contribute and assist the OP. I should not have let my frustrations with one poster drag this thread down, I am sorry to all.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 2:13 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.