Wikiposts

Oh dear.....

Thread Tools
 
Old May 16th 2006, 1:11 am
  #46  
Keeping it fairly real
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Location: In the sun
Posts: 32,863
walla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Oh dear.....

I'm really disappointed with this thread, it's quite appalling really.

I've read the link posted by Phoenix and what I've read I have to say is wrong just like any other cases of child abuse I read about on a daily basis(white men do it too, it's called paedophilia). It goes on in every part of society unfortunately.

This thread has degenerated into a racially motivated thread against Aboriginal people who are the original owners of the land we are privileged to live in.

Incidentally does anyone who has contributed to this thread know an Aboriginal person?

No wonder I hardly post on here these days......
walla is offline  
Old May 16th 2006, 1:34 am
  #47  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,158
iPom is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Oh dear.....

Originally Posted by walla
Incidentally does anyone who has contributed to this thread know an Aboriginal person?

Yes. My sister in law.
iPom is offline  
Old May 16th 2006, 1:48 am
  #48  
Keeping it fairly real
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Location: In the sun
Posts: 32,863
walla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Oh dear.....

Originally Posted by iPom
Yes. My sister in law.
Big family?
walla is offline  
Old May 16th 2006, 1:57 am
  #49  
Bix
da Bonehead
 
Bix's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Lion in da jungle
Posts: 22,767
Bix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Oh dear.....

To degenerate means to get worse over time so as I joined the thread in it's later stages I suppose you are referring to my comments Dave.

Nothing I have said stems from any personal racialism on my part I can assure you and I am sorry if you interpreted it that way.

I have been quite surprised by what I have found here in FNQ on this subject and have tried to express what I see as some fundamental and underlying failures in addressing them.

Whilst my posts drifted somewhat from the original topic they were related as it all comes back to the same thing. What is acceptable to society at large and by that I mean beyond these shores.

Yes paedophilia does happen and is hounded and punished. The fact Aboriginals are a minority group should not in my opinion mean they are not answerable to the same punishment.....laws of the land.

To answer your question.....yes, I know Aboriginals. I live amongst them, work directly with them and meet them in my work.

I'm really sorry if what I said has upset you mate but it's how I see it and I repeat not founded on personal racialism.
Bix is offline  
Old May 16th 2006, 2:06 am
  #50  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
geordie mandy's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Ballarat
Posts: 7,005
geordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Oh dear.....

Originally Posted by walla
I'm really disappointed with this thread, it's quite appalling really.

I've read the link posted by Phoenix and what I've read I have to say is wrong just like any other cases of child abuse I read about on a daily basis(white men do it too, it's called paedophilia). It goes on in every part of society unfortunately.

This thread has degenerated into a racially motivated thread against Aboriginal people who are the original owners of the land we are privileged to live in.

Incidentally does anyone who has contributed to this thread know an Aboriginal person?

No wonder I hardly post on here these days......
Hiya Walla
I may not know any aboriginals and the crime reported is disgusting and to me it does not matter who commited the offence, those that did need punishing.
I will agree it is paedophillia which sickens me to the core. These children need protecting from offenders whether they are white Australians or aborginies. that fact that this crime was committed by aborigines reflects on peoples comments. I certainly try to treat every one as equals but that crime needs something to be done by it.
i would hope that there would be aboriginal representation in courts so that all those being punished got a fair hearing.
i dont think this thread has been unfair to aboringines all it is trying to do is the impossible task of finding solutions.
I know i shall be doing more research into aboginal australia so that when i do arrive i can hopefully associate amongst them. As you rightly say it is their land we live on, but that does not give any one the license to commit crime.
No matter colour or creed.
Mandy
geordie mandy is offline  
Old May 16th 2006, 2:11 am
  #51  
Forum Regular
 
djfbug's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: Now in Melbourne!!
Posts: 183
djfbug is just really nicedjfbug is just really nicedjfbug is just really nicedjfbug is just really nicedjfbug is just really nicedjfbug is just really nicedjfbug is just really nicedjfbug is just really nicedjfbug is just really nicedjfbug is just really nice
Default Re: Oh dear.....

Originally Posted by geordie mandy
Hiya Walla
I may not know any aboriginals and the crime reported is disgusting and to me it does not matter who commited the offence, those that did need punishing.
I will agree it is paedophillia which sickens me to the core. These children need protecting from offenders whether they are white Australians or aborginies. that fact that this crime was committed by aborigines reflects on peoples comments. I certainly try to treat every one as equals but that crime needs something to be done by it.
i would hope that there would be aboriginal representation in courts so that all those being punished got a fair hearing.
i dont think this thread has been unfair to aboringines all it is trying to do is the impossible task of finding solutions.
I know i shall be doing more research into aboginal australia so that when i do arrive i can hopefully associate amongst them. As you rightly say it is their land we live on, but that does not give any one the license to commit crime.
No matter colour or creed.
Mandy
Well said Mandy - I didn't feel the post had degenerated into a racial slanging match and my comments were really "What the hell can be done!"
djfbug is offline  
Old May 16th 2006, 2:14 am
  #52  
Home and Happy
 
Pollyana's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Keep true friends and puppets close, trust no-one else...
Posts: 93,860
Pollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Oh dear.....

Originally Posted by walla
I'm really disappointed with this thread, it's quite appalling really.

I've read the link posted by Phoenix and what I've read I have to say is wrong just like any other cases of child abuse I read about on a daily basis(white men do it too, it's called paedophilia). It goes on in every part of society unfortunately.

This thread has degenerated into a racially motivated thread against Aboriginal people who are the original owners of the land we are privileged to live in.

Incidentally does anyone who has contributed to this thread know an Aboriginal person?

No wonder I hardly post on here these days......
Actually, I have to disagree there. This was a topic that could very easily have descended into a multitude of racist comments, but it has actually been very balanced and realistic.

If you've read Bix's posts you will have seen that he does know Aboriginal people (hardly surprising as he hails from Cairns) and he has posted a very fair view of his dealings with them. I often come into contact with Aboriginal and Torres Strait people at work, and during the cyclone recovery work have had more dealings than normal, and I would echo many of the views and opinions on here, based on my own personal experiences.
Its an excellent discussion - long may it run.
Pollyana is offline  
Old May 16th 2006, 2:17 am
  #53  
Keeping it fairly real
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Location: In the sun
Posts: 32,863
walla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond reputewalla has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Oh dear.....

Originally Posted by Pollyana
Actually, I have to disagree there. This was a topic that could very easily have descended into a multitude of racist comments, but it has actually been very balanced and realistic.

If you've read Bix's posts you will have seen that he does know Aboriginal people (hardly surprising as he hails from Cairns) and he has posted a very fair view of his dealings with them. I often come into contact with Aboriginal and Torres Strait people at work, and during the cyclone recovery work have had more dealings than normal, and I would echo many of the views and opinions on here, based on my own personal experiences.
Its an excellent discussion - long may it run.
I wasn't alluding to Bix's posts.
walla is offline  
Old May 16th 2006, 4:15 am
  #54  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
geordie mandy's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Ballarat
Posts: 7,005
geordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Oh dear.....

Originally Posted by walla
I wasn't alluding to Bix's posts.

Walla who is it that has upset you so much? As far as i can see no one has been offensive about aboriginals .
Mandy

Last edited by geordie mandy; May 16th 2006 at 4:18 am.
geordie mandy is offline  
Old May 16th 2006, 5:05 am
  #55  
UK is Home
 
Sunny_Glesga's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Home- "Glasgow"
Posts: 1,137
Sunny_Glesga has a reputation beyond reputeSunny_Glesga has a reputation beyond reputeSunny_Glesga has a reputation beyond reputeSunny_Glesga has a reputation beyond reputeSunny_Glesga has a reputation beyond reputeSunny_Glesga has a reputation beyond reputeSunny_Glesga has a reputation beyond reputeSunny_Glesga has a reputation beyond reputeSunny_Glesga has a reputation beyond reputeSunny_Glesga has a reputation beyond reputeSunny_Glesga has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Oh dear.....

Well Said!

I have read a few of the posts on this subject and my opinion is that no matter who you are, where your from, what cultures and beliefs that you may have in any shape or form, Crimes like this should be dealt with in the most harshest way possible!

I am absolutely sickened to the core that things like this can happen and there is any doubt of how this should be dealt with!

Lets just have a thought that no matter who would be committing this crime ( if its part of their culture or who they have been for whatever how many years) they, whoever come to the UK, Should we allow this to happen here withought anything being done about it as its their way in their own country? or should they simply be allowed to commit these horrendous crimes in their own country?

No matter what this should not be allowed to happen, what needs to be done to stop this SHOULD be done no matter what!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If`s, But`s, Cultures B****ks. Something needs to be done!







Originally Posted by Springbok
I am myself from South Africa originally, I have seen and know the problems that they are experiencing over there between differing tribes and of course whites but I am truly astounded with the off the cuff discussion about the Aborigines and their traditions. Yes they have not been inter-grated into society as they should have been and maybe they don't want to be but for God's sake a line has to be drawn somewhere to stop that sort of thing. Those children have no way of defending themselves. Religion plays no part in it. These men know they are doing wrong. To suggest they don't means they are not human or cannot think for themselves. Australia is a first world country, it shames me to think that the people that run it think there is nothing that can be done. If that is the case then we are all in trouble. The problem has to be addressed not just left . Examples have to be made.

Go on and shoot me down now.
Sunny_Glesga is offline  
Old May 16th 2006, 5:19 am
  #56  
Forum Regular
 
hedgehog's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 269
hedgehog is a splendid one to beholdhedgehog is a splendid one to beholdhedgehog is a splendid one to beholdhedgehog is a splendid one to beholdhedgehog is a splendid one to beholdhedgehog is a splendid one to beholdhedgehog is a splendid one to beholdhedgehog is a splendid one to beholdhedgehog is a splendid one to beholdhedgehog is a splendid one to beholdhedgehog is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Oh dear.....

Originally Posted by Springbok
I am myself from South Africa originally, I have seen and know the problems that they are experiencing over there between differing tribes and of course whites but I am truly astounded with the off the cuff discussion about the Aborigines and their traditions. Yes they have not been inter-grated into society as they should have been and maybe they don't want to be but for God's sake a line has to be drawn somewhere to stop that sort of thing. Those children have no way of defending themselves. Religion plays no part in it. These men know they are doing wrong. To suggest they don't means they are not human or cannot think for themselves. Australia is a first world country, it shames me to think that the people that run it think there is nothing that can be done. If that is the case then we are all in trouble. The problem has to be addressed not just left . Examples have to be made.

Go on and shoot me down now.
I agree with you totally. I don't think the attitude should be "well there only harming their own" or "It was their country originally after all, so they can do what they want" This is the 21st century and these people should be prosecuted regardless of the colour of their skin. They are not animals who kill/hunt to survive they are human beings so they should act and be treated that way. Regardless of someones religious beliefs or the colour of their skin, there has to be law and order for a country to stay civilised. I don't know anyone who thinks it is not WRONG to rape/ murder a child so why don't the aborigines know this?. I think the excuse you took our land so we can do what we want will wear thin one day.
hedgehog is offline  
Old May 16th 2006, 8:35 am
  #57  
Fighting my corner
 
Vash the Stampede's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 11,948
Vash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond repute
Arrow Re: Oh dear.....

Originally Posted by phoenixinoz
Reading this today at work I was shocked by some of the comments in this report.

http://www.Australian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,19149874-2702,00.html


The aboriginal communities *seem* on the whole to be displaced.

It got me thinking.

Does Australia enable aboriginal communities live their own lives relatively undisturbed and unchanged as they have for thousands of years, or does Australia intervene and integrate them into the majority*Australian* society?
To some extent, this is one of those awful Catch 22 situations.

Intervene, and the government will be accused of forcing white, Western culture on the indigenous population. People will claim that the government is returning to the policies of the "stolen generation" era. The cry will go up: "Australians don't care about the Aborigines!"

Do nothing, and the government will be accused of condoning violence and violent sex crimes. The cry will go up: "Australians don't care about the Aborigines!"

Either way, we are screwed.

You said it best in a later post, when you wrote:

Perhaps it's one of those situations that whatever Australia does, it will be wrong i.e no win situation
Many people (Australians included) do not realise that some Aboriginal communities in remote areas are freely permitted to maintain tribal law; their societies are allowed to function outside the federal justice system, in the interests of preserving indigenous culture and tradition.

The motives behind this concession are admirable indeed, but the practical application is rife with moral and ethical dilemmas.

Aboriginal culture draws a distinct line between "secret men's business" and "secret women's business." Australia's legal system has generally respected and upheld this distinction, even in cases where Aboriginal testimony is presented in Western courts. In a couple of cases, female solicitors have been asked to leave the court when evidence which includes "secret men's business" is presented.

Problems arise when this distinction prevents the open discussion and confrontation of social problems within Aboriginal society. Violent crime is one such problem, and it is sadly systemic within remote Aboriginal communities.

The issue is complicated even further when Aboriginal and Western law is applied simultaneously to a case involving Aboriginal criminals and Aboriginal victims.

For example:

When Kevin Webb, accused of murder, was given a week's bail by an Alice Springs court earlier this year, he knew immediately what to do.

He went to the Aboriginal community of Nyirripi, 280 miles north-west of Alice Springs, where the family of his alleged victim, Max Brown, lives. While a nurse and police officers stood by, he submitted to Brown's relatives spearing him 13 times in the legs and breaking his ankle.

Such payback punishments have gone on for thousands of years in Australia's Aboriginal communities. What was unusual in Kevin Webb's case is that the Alice Springs magistrate, Michael Ward, gave him bail so that he could suffer this punishment. He is likely to be given a reduced sentence in consequence.
Source.

And again:

In 2002, Damien Rictor received a reduced prison sentence for manslaughter, because he'd already been speared in the legs as tribal punishment.

[...]

PETER COLLINS: Traditional customary practice in terms of punishment by way of spearing or floggings with nulla nullas is still a regular occurrence. And in appropriate cases it'll be presented before sentencing courts for them to take into account in imposing sentence.
Source.

As far as I'm aware, spearing and flogging are not condoned by the United Nations Human Rights Commission. Yet they are condoned by Aboriginal law, for the purpose of enforcing that law.

Uphold Aboriginal law, and we break our commitment to the UNHRC. Prohibit Aboriginal law, and we break our commitment to the UNHRC.

How do we resolve this clash of cultures without unfairly discriminating against one of them?

There are other aspects of Aboriginal law which - although abhorrent to Western minds - are nevertheless upheld in remote Aboriginal communities and subsequently accepted by Western courts.

For example:

In one recent case a 50 year-old-man previously convicted of the manslaughter of his former wife was given a 24-hour prison sentence in a Northern Territory court for allegedly forcing sex on a 15-year-old girl.

Jackie Pascoe Jamilmira had been paying the girl's family with gifts since her birth so that she would become his wife upon coming of age. In her statement to the police the girl said that he had punched her, trod on her neck and raped her. When her family arrived the next day and tried to take her away, Pascoe drove them off by firing a shotgun in the air.

Charged with indecent assault, Pascoe was sentenced to 13 months, but it was reduced to 24 hours on review. Justice John Gallop said that he was given a custodial sentence only because it was mandatory in the territory, and added that the police need never have known about the case if he had not fired the gun.
Source.

Legal under Aboriginal law; illegal under Western law. Which takes precedence?

There are plenty of other cases (see here and here) which highlight the desperate state of many Aboriginal communities.

Too often, the root of the problem is alcohol - easily accessible, and just as easily purchased with the government handouts which now constitute the most common form of income in these remote areas. Concurrent with the presence of alcohol is endemic substance abuse; illicit drugs, petrol-sniffing and glue-sniffing.

People often talk about the appalling state of Aboriginal health - and yes, it's terrible, and yes, more should be done, and yes, the government needs to put a hell of a lot more work into it.

But having said that, people often forget to mention (or perhaps don't even know?) that substance abuse and various forms of addiction are largely to blame. We can talk about the extent to which the Australian government is (or isn't) meeting its obligation to deal with these problems, but that's not the same as agreeing that the Australian government is responsible for them.

When you read about Aboriginal people in remote communities having a life-span less than half the length of their white counterparts, or suffering from 3rd World diseases, stop for a moment and ask yourself if this is really so surprising in a place where people regularly go into town for their dole money and spend it all on alcohol in the space of a week.

Then ask yourself what you would do to make everything better - because that's the big issue.

Sure, you can just throw money at the problem. But does this really solve anything...?

Welfare dependency is the major cause of the poverty and alcoholism which has destroyed Aboriginal society, indigenous leaders have told a conference.

Aboriginal lawyer Noel Pearson said the current system had failed and Australia's Aborigines must be encouraged to take responsibility for their own finances, health and education.

[...]

Mr Pearson, leader of Cape York Aboriginals, said said what Aboriginal people needed most was not more welfare, but "an immediate dismantling of the passive welfare paradigm and an end to the permissive drug policy".

Source.


Where do we go from here? There is no easy answer. Year after year of increased funding has achieved limited results. Political storms over the role of ATSIC and its eventual demise have contributed little to the debate.

Blame-games and bickering between government agencies, lobby groups and charitable organisations have distracted them from the root causes of the problems, and divided the very organisations which are supposed to be united in their efforts to assist, protect and nurture the original inhabitants of Australia.

While it is universally agreed that something must be done, the solution - as ever - remains elusive.

Last edited by Vash the Stampede; May 16th 2006 at 8:43 am.
Vash the Stampede is offline  
Old May 16th 2006, 8:43 am
  #58  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
geordie mandy's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Ballarat
Posts: 7,005
geordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond reputegeordie mandy has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Oh dear.....

Originally Posted by Vash the Stampede
To some extent, this is one of those awful Catch 22 situations.

Intervene, and the government will be accused of forcing white, Western culture on the indigenous population. People will claim that the government is returning to the policies of the "stolen generation" era. The cry will go up: "Australians don't care about the Aborigines!"

Do nothing, and the government will be accused of condoning violence and violent sex crimes. The cry will go up: "Australians don't care about the Aborigines!"

Either way, we are screwed.

You said it best in a later post, when you wrote:



Many people (Australians included) do not realise that some Aboriginal communities in remote areas are freely permitted to maintain tribal law; their societies are allowed to function outside the federal justice system, in the interests of preserving indigenous culture and tradition.

The motives behind this concession are admirable indeed, but the practical application is rife with moral and ethical dilemmas.

Aboriginal culture draws a distinct line between "secret men's business" and "secret women's business." Australia's legal system has generally respected and upheld this distinction, even in cases where Aboriginal testimony is presented in Western courts. In a couple of cases, female solicitors have been asked to leave the court when evidence which includes "secret men's business" is presented.

Problems arise when this distinction prevents the open discussion and confrontation of social problems within Aboriginal society. Violent crime is one such problem, and it is sadly systemic within remote Aboriginal communities.

The issue is complicated even further when Aboriginal and Western law is applied simultaneously to a case involving Aboriginal criminals and Aboriginal victims.

For example:

When Kevin Webb, accused of murder, was given a week's bail by an Alice Springs court earlier this year, he knew immediately what to do.

He went to the Aboriginal community of Nyirripi, 280 miles north-west of Alice Springs, where the family of his alleged victim, Max Brown, lives. While a nurse and police officers stood by, he submitted to Brown's relatives spearing him 13 times in the legs and breaking his ankle.

Such payback punishments have gone on for thousands of years in Australia's Aboriginal communities. What was unusual in Kevin Webb's case is that the Alice Springs magistrate, Michael Ward, gave him bail so that he could suffer this punishment. He is likely to be given a reduced sentence in consequence.
Source.

And again:

In 2002, Damien Rictor received a reduced prison sentence for manslaughter, because he'd already been speared in the legs as tribal punishment.

[...]

PETER COLLINS: Traditional customary practice in terms of punishment by way of spearing or floggings with nulla nullas is still a regular occurrence. And in appropriate cases it'll be presented before sentencing courts for them to take into account in imposing sentence.
Source.

As far as I'm aware, spearing and flogging are not condoned by the United Nations Human Rights Commission. Yet they are condoned by Aboriginal law, for the purpose of enforcing that law.

Uphold Aboriginal law, and we break our commitment to the UNHRC. Prohibit Aboriginal law, and we break our commitment to the UNHRC.

How do we resolve this clash of cultures without unfairly discriminating against one of them?

There are other aspects of Aboriginal law which - although abhorrent to Western minds - are nevertheless upheld in remote Aboriginal communities and subsequently accepted by Western courts.

For example:

In one recent case a 50 year-old-man previously convicted of the manslaughter of his former wife was given a 24-hour prison sentence in a Northern Territory court for allegedly forcing sex on a 15-year-old girl.

Jackie Pascoe Jamilmira had been paying the girl's family with gifts since her birth so that she would become his wife upon coming of age. In her statement to the police the girl said that he had punched her, trod on her neck and raped her. When her family arrived the next day and tried to take her away, Pascoe drove them off by firing a shotgun in the air.

Charged with indecent assault, Pascoe was sentenced to 13 months, but it was reduced to 24 hours on review. Justice John Gallop said that he was given a custodial sentence only because it was mandatory in the territory, and added that the police need never have known about the case if he had not fired the gun.
Source.

Legal under Aboriginal law; illegal under Western law. Which takes precedence?

There are plenty of other cases (see here and here) which highlight the desperate state of many Aboriginal communities.

Too often, the root of the problem is alcohol - easily accessible, and just as easily purchased with the government handouts which now constitute the most common form of income in these remote areas. Concurrent with the presence of alcohol is endemic substance abuse; illicit drugs, petrol-sniffing and glue-sniffing.

People often talk about the appalling state of Aboriginal health - and yes, it's terrible, and yes, more should be done, and yes, the government needs to put a hell of a lot more work into it.

But having said that, people often forget to mention (or perhaps don't even know?) that substance abuse and various forms of addiction are largely to blame. We can talk about the extent to which the Australian government is (or isn't) meeting its obligation to deal with these problems, but that's not the same as agreeing that the Australian government is responsible for them.

When you read about Aboriginal people in remote communities having a life-span less than half the length of their white counterparts, or suffering from 3rd World diseases, stop for a moment and ask yourself if this is really so surprising in a place where
people regularly go into town for their dole money and spend it all on alcohol in the space of a week.

Then ask yourself what you would do to make everything better - because that's the big issue.

Where do we go from here? There is no easy answer. Year after year of increased funding has achieved limited results. Political storms over the role of ATSIC and its eventual demise have contributed little to the debate.

Blame-games and bickering between government agencies, lobby groups and charitable organisations have distracted them from the root causes of the problems, and divided the very organisations which are supposed to be united in their efforts to assist, protect and nurture the original inhabitants of Australia.

While it is universally agreed that something must be done, the solution - as ever - remains elusive.

Vash that post is very informative and is helping me understand the whole aboriginal culture verses western culture and the problems associated with it.
I just feel sorry for the next generation of aborginies if there is no difference in the cycle of abuse and i suppose mistrust of western laws.
As you say no easy answers to such a complex problem
Mandy
geordie mandy is offline  
Old May 16th 2006, 8:48 am
  #59  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Wendy's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: at the bottom of a wine glass
Posts: 28,176
Wendy has a reputation beyond reputeWendy has a reputation beyond reputeWendy has a reputation beyond reputeWendy has a reputation beyond reputeWendy has a reputation beyond reputeWendy has a reputation beyond reputeWendy has a reputation beyond reputeWendy has a reputation beyond reputeWendy has a reputation beyond reputeWendy has a reputation beyond reputeWendy has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Oh dear.....

Originally Posted by Vash the Stampede
To some extent, this is one of those awful Catch 22 situations.

Intervene, and the government will be accused of forcing white, Western culture on the indigenous population. People will claim that the government is returning to the policies of the "stolen generation" era. The cry will go up: "Australians don't care about the Aborigines!"

Do nothing, and the government will be accused of condoning violence and violent sex crimes. The cry will go up: "Australians don't care about the Aborigines!"

Either way, we are screwed.

You said it best in a later post, when you wrote:



Many people (Australians included) do not realise that some Aboriginal communities in remote areas are freely permitted to maintain tribal law; their societies are allowed to function outside the federal justice system, in the interests of preserving indigenous culture and tradition.

The motives behind this concession are admirable indeed, but the practical application is rife with moral and ethical dilemmas.

Aboriginal culture draws a distinct line between "secret men's business" and "secret women's business." Australia's legal system has generally respected and upheld this distinction, even in cases where Aboriginal testimony is presented in Western courts. In a couple of cases, female solicitors have been asked to leave the court when evidence which includes "secret men's business" is presented.

Problems arise when this distinction prevents the open discussion and confrontation of social problems within Aboriginal society. Violent crime is one such problem, and it is sadly systemic within remote Aboriginal communities.

The issue is complicated even further when Aboriginal and Western law is applied simultaneously to a case involving Aboriginal criminals and Aboriginal victims.

For example:

When Kevin Webb, accused of murder, was given a week's bail by an Alice Springs court earlier this year, he knew immediately what to do.

He went to the Aboriginal community of Nyirripi, 280 miles north-west of Alice Springs, where the family of his alleged victim, Max Brown, lives. While a nurse and police officers stood by, he submitted to Brown's relatives spearing him 13 times in the legs and breaking his ankle.

Such payback punishments have gone on for thousands of years in Australia's Aboriginal communities. What was unusual in Kevin Webb's case is that the Alice Springs magistrate, Michael Ward, gave him bail so that he could suffer this punishment. He is likely to be given a reduced sentence in consequence.
Source.

And again:

In 2002, Damien Rictor received a reduced prison sentence for manslaughter, because he'd already been speared in the legs as tribal punishment.

[...]

PETER COLLINS: Traditional customary practice in terms of punishment by way of spearing or floggings with nulla nullas is still a regular occurrence. And in appropriate cases it'll be presented before sentencing courts for them to take into account in imposing sentence.
Source.

As far as I'm aware, spearing and flogging are not condoned by the United Nations Human Rights Commission. Yet they are condoned by Aboriginal law, for the purpose of enforcing that law.

Uphold Aboriginal law, and we break our commitment to the UNHRC. Prohibit Aboriginal law, and we break our commitment to the UNHRC.

How do we resolve this clash of cultures without unfairly discriminating against one of them?

There are other aspects of Aboriginal law which - although abhorrent to Western minds - are nevertheless upheld in remote Aboriginal communities and subsequently accepted by Western courts.

For example:

In one recent case a 50 year-old-man previously convicted of the manslaughter of his former wife was given a 24-hour prison sentence in a Northern Territory court for allegedly forcing sex on a 15-year-old girl.

Jackie Pascoe Jamilmira had been paying the girl's family with gifts since her birth so that she would become his wife upon coming of age. In her statement to the police the girl said that he had punched her, trod on her neck and raped her. When her family arrived the next day and tried to take her away, Pascoe drove them off by firing a shotgun in the air.

Charged with indecent assault, Pascoe was sentenced to 13 months, but it was reduced to 24 hours on review. Justice John Gallop said that he was given a custodial sentence only because it was mandatory in the territory, and added that the police need never have known about the case if he had not fired the gun.
Source.

Legal under Aboriginal law; illegal under Western law. Which takes precedence?

There are plenty of other cases (see here and here) which highlight the desperate state of many Aboriginal communities.

Too often, the root of the problem is alcohol - easily accessible, and just as easily purchased with the government handouts which now constitute the most common form of income in these remote areas. Concurrent with the presence of alcohol is endemic substance abuse; illicit drugs, petrol-sniffing and glue-sniffing.

People often talk about the appalling state of Aboriginal health - and yes, it's terrible, and yes, more should be done, and yes, the government needs to put a hell of a lot more work into it.

But having said that, people often forget to mention (or perhaps don't even know?) that substance abuse and various forms of addiction are largely to blame. We can talk about the extent to which the Australian government is (or isn't) meeting its obligation to deal with these problems, but that's not the same as agreeing that the Australian government is responsible for them.

When you read about Aboriginal people in remote communities having a life-span less than half the length of their white counterparts, or suffering from 3rd World diseases, stop for a moment and ask yourself if this is really so surprising in a place where people regularly go into town for their dole money and spend it all on alcohol in the space of a week.

Then ask yourself what you would do to make everything better - because that's the big issue.

Sure, you can just throw money at the problem. But does this really solve anything...?

Welfare dependency is the major cause of the poverty and alcoholism which has destroyed Aboriginal society, indigenous leaders have told a conference.

Aboriginal lawyer Noel Pearson said the current system had failed and Australia's Aborigines must be encouraged to take responsibility for their own finances, health and education.

[...]

Mr Pearson, leader of Cape York Aboriginals, said said what Aboriginal people needed most was not more welfare, but "an immediate dismantling of the passive welfare paradigm and an end to the permissive drug policy".

Source.


Where do we go from here? There is no easy answer. Year after year of increased funding has achieved limited results. Political storms over the role of ATSIC and its eventual demise have contributed little to the debate.

Blame-games and bickering between government agencies, lobby groups and charitable organisations have distracted them from the root causes of the problems, and divided the very organisations which are supposed to be united in their efforts to assist, protect and nurture the original inhabitants of Australia.

While it is universally agreed that something must be done, the solution - as ever - remains elusive.

Nice post Vash. Thanks for taking the time to write it, it shows that we have much to learn.

K sent
Wendy is offline  
Old May 16th 2006, 8:51 am
  #60  
Fighting my corner
 
Vash the Stampede's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 11,948
Vash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond reputeVash the Stampede has a reputation beyond repute
Thumbs up Re: Oh dear.....

Originally Posted by geordie mandy
Vash that post is very informative and is helping me understand the whole aboriginal culture verses western culture and the problems associated with it.

I just feel sorry for the next generation of aborginies if there is no difference in the cycle of abuse and i suppose mistrust of western laws.

As you say no easy answers to such a complex problem

Mandy
Thanks Mandy.

I feel strongly about this issue, not just because I had Aboriginal friends and workmates back home, but because it is something that ultimately affects the entire nation, and yet is so frequently misunderstood and misrepresented.
Vash the Stampede is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.