The NBN Rip off
#17
Forum Regular

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 39



Building a fibre infrastructure in Oz is not the same as building one in the UK. You have the larger areas to cover, the expanse of empty land, the refriderated heatproof cabinets to protect the cables from the harsh sun, the connections between homes being further apart...the list goes on. All this costs money.
#18









Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,555

I looked at the pricing and I will be better off with NBN. You do not need to pay line rental.
ADSL is great close to the exchange but useless at 4kms.
Fibre has lower latency which makes it much better for voice and video conferencing. For business the ability to centralize services and get rid of costly site servers will be a big productivity gain.
For me I save money and work saves money.
ADSL is great close to the exchange but useless at 4kms.
Fibre has lower latency which makes it much better for voice and video conferencing. For business the ability to centralize services and get rid of costly site servers will be a big productivity gain.
For me I save money and work saves money.
#19









Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,555

ADSL2+ is download speeds up to 24mbs. The speeds slow the further you are from the exchange. At four kms the technology becomes unstable.
#20
So Optus today luanched its fees for customers to use the NBN. I was a supporter of the idea on the assumption that it would reduce costs and stop using pathetic download limits. Well i was wrong.
The starting package will be $39.99 a month and offer a speed of 12Mb and a download limit of 40Gb. Crap. Virgin in the UK are offering 100Mb speed with unlimited download and a land line telephone for 32 pounds a month and sky are doing Sky TV, land line with free calls, 20Mb down loads speed net unlimited for 32.50 a month.
I had semi believed the crap the companies used to spout about Oz being such a big place and the costs of putting in systems. But i as a tax payer have now paid for the lines and you are still ripping me off.
The starting package will be $39.99 a month and offer a speed of 12Mb and a download limit of 40Gb. Crap. Virgin in the UK are offering 100Mb speed with unlimited download and a land line telephone for 32 pounds a month and sky are doing Sky TV, land line with free calls, 20Mb down loads speed net unlimited for 32.50 a month.
I had semi believed the crap the companies used to spout about Oz being such a big place and the costs of putting in systems. But i as a tax payer have now paid for the lines and you are still ripping me off.
What happens if few people take up the NBN and stick with their current arrangements?
Last edited by Vash the Stampede; Nov 10th 2011 at 1:57 pm.
#21
This is an Optus rip off, not an NBN rip off. iiNet's prices are much better. Still ludicrously expensive compared to the UK, but heading in the right direction.
Agreed.
It is difficult to understand why anyone would stick with an arrangement that is slower and more expensive than the NBN contracts.
Agreed.
It is difficult to understand why anyone would stick with an arrangement that is slower and more expensive than the NBN contracts.
Dont forget to add line rental to the UK prices... With IInet.= no line rental.
#22
BE Forum Addict








Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,396











#26
With iinet, if you want to use their VoIP phone service with their NBN offerings it's an additional $9.95/month.
#29
So Optus today luanched its fees for customers to use the NBN. I was a supporter of the idea on the assumption that it would reduce costs and stop using pathetic download limits. Well i was wrong.
The starting package will be $39.99 a month and offer a speed of 12Mb and a download limit of 40Gb. Crap. Virgin in the UK are offering 100Mb speed with unlimited download and a land line telephone for 32 pounds a month....
The starting package will be $39.99 a month and offer a speed of 12Mb and a download limit of 40Gb. Crap. Virgin in the UK are offering 100Mb speed with unlimited download and a land line telephone for 32 pounds a month....
45 equates to $99 which is not much different to the $99 100Mb plans offered in oz. Of course the Oz plans have download limits (500Gb) but that is nothing to do with NBN as there was no promise that the NBN would address this. As has been said this is a geographical limitation of having to lay very expensive trans pacific cables and then share this throughput. Virgin in the UK use their speed limiting to keep usage down.
The promise of the NBN is of course universal high speed access. The private rollout of ADSL has left us with a mish mash of services with many having no or poor access. Virgin are only cherry picking one third of UK homes. With the lower density here cherry picking by private companies would leave us with even poorer fibre optic access.
I think the NBN has the promise to be one of the best policies of the decade. It will allow all sorts of innovate proactive and reactive govt service delivery in health, education, social services, transport, registrations etc just when the aging population and reduced tax base begins to really strain govt services.
Last edited by fish.01; Nov 10th 2011 at 10:44 pm.




