![]() |
Re: Monthly living expense
Originally Posted by canadaeh
(Post 8580311)
I’m not saying you don’t. If you contributed then I don’t care if you get child benefit. It’s the fact that someone can just arrive and from day one get it that annoys me. There should be a waiting period – just like unemployment benefits. Do you think it would be fair for someone to get that from day 1?
|
Re: Monthly living expense
Originally Posted by Sass73
(Post 8580668)
Best of luck with the job hunting Jen. We're in the same boat regarding wages - Hubbie's been out of work for nearly 6 months and he's getting so frustrated with the lack of respect shown by some of the recruitment agencies. I keep chanting 'patience is a virtue' too!
:fingerscrossed::fingerscrossed: |
Re: Monthly living expense
Originally Posted by shafanm
(Post 8581544)
What kind of job is your hubby looking for ?
|
Re: Monthly living expense
Originally Posted by shafanm
(Post 8581537)
Any idea current rental market in and around Footscray area, preferably two bedroom apartment.
|
Re: Monthly living expense
Originally Posted by Centurion
(Post 8581683)
I agree. Having children, for many well off westerners, is a choice in the main. The child benefit should be at least be fully means tested. It sort of irks me that people migrate, claim it, whilst at the same time trying to decide on which new car to buy or which affluent suburb offers the best school.
Which private school do we pick, and how much Benefit will the taxpayer contribute to our childs chosen private school costs ? In theory, if you can afford private schools, you don't NEED the child benefit. |
Re: Monthly living expense
Originally Posted by Centurion
(Post 8581683)
I agree. Having children, for many well off westerners, is a choice in the main. The child benefit should be at least be fully means tested. It sort of irks me that people migrate, claim it, whilst at the same time trying to decide on which new car to buy or which affluent suburb offers the best school.
Of course, when I go back to work, that will pretty much disappear as our combined income will probably be over the threshold (I won't earn much, just enough to tip the scales...). We have a 10 year-old car and have not moved to an affluent suburb because of a shool. Couldn't afford it. We've been here 7 years, have been paying our taxes here for 7 years and because we were temporary residents until last year, we have never got the baby bonus or any of the other handouts from the government (except for FHBG). And we didn't even claim the LAFHA. So not everybody lives off other people's taxes... And I have not gone back to work earlier as we would have been worse off because of the cost of childcare (even with the rebate). Couldn't justify going to work just to pay for childcare...
Originally Posted by ABCDiamond
(Post 8582109)
In theory, if you can afford private schools, you don't NEED the child benefit.
|
Re: Monthly living expense
Originally Posted by elice_in_oz
(Post 8582195)
I completely agree with you there. If you have enough money to send your kids to private school (heavily subsidised by our taxes too btw), you shouldn't get anything.
The average state school child costs the taxpayer about $11,000 pa but the private school ones only cost about $6,700 pa. source |
Re: Monthly living expense
A family does not have to earn that much to get no FTB. Given that immigrants generally work hard in their new country I would imagine that most get very little off the Government. We had to give most of ours back so would not even bother getting involved with Centrelink unless we were desperate.
You will also very quickly look at private schooling especially if you live in Queensland. I do remember though that one of the reps who visits us has four Children and that is the magic number where it is debatable whether it is worth working or not if there is only one bread winner in the family as the benefits become very generous. In his case working was slightly more attractive than staying at home. |
Re: Monthly living expense
Originally Posted by neil248
(Post 8583522)
A family does not have to earn that much to get no FTB.
2009-10 FTB Part A Actual annual family income limit at which Family Tax Benefit stops, with 1 child under 17: $101,045 FTB Part B is limited to families (single parent or couple) where the primary earner has an adjusted taxable income of $150,000 per year or less. |
Re: Monthly living expense
Originally Posted by ABCDiamond
(Post 8584183)
Define "much"..
2009-10 FTB Part A Actual annual family income limit at which Family Tax Benefit stops, with 1 child under 17: $101,045 FTB Part B is limited to families (single parent or couple) where the primary earner has an adjusted taxable income of $150,000 per year or less. If I am not mistaken average australian family income is 67k, So it seem most Australian must be claiming FTB B. correct me if I am wrong |
Re: Monthly living expense
Originally Posted by shafanm
(Post 8584709)
$150,000 per year or less :confused:
If I am not mistaken average australian family income is 67k, So it seem most Australian must be claiming FTB B. correct me if I am wrong But Yes, a lot do get it. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 12:33 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.