IELTS standards sham!
#31
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,555
Re: IELTS standards sham!
Is there a requirement for Geordies and Jocks to take the oral exam as I am fecked if I can ever understand them?
#32
Re: IELTS standards sham!
Well that maybe the case, unless they have a british/irish passport. If they do and can make up the points based on experience in another non english speaking country and, in fact only spent the early years of their life in Britain/Ireland, they dont have to prove their langauge skills. If it was a strict requirement, everyone would have to sit the test.
#33
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 3,162
Re: IELTS standards sham!
Bermudashorts,
I think if you run a quick search on the IELTS results people get on these forums, you WILL find that most native speakers of the English language do not get a 9 in speaking (nerves on the day, the quick fire questions that try to catch you out etc) so try not to be too amazed
Just out of interest have you ever done a IELTS exam?
I think if you run a quick search on the IELTS results people get on these forums, you WILL find that most native speakers of the English language do not get a 9 in speaking (nerves on the day, the quick fire questions that try to catch you out etc) so try not to be too amazed
Just out of interest have you ever done a IELTS exam?
The IELTS was definatly harder than I expect it to be, but I still scored 9 over all (written also being the lowest at 8).
#34
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: UK (For now)
Posts: 46
Re: IELTS standards sham!
I don't disagree with you pumpkin blossom, but different examiners use different techniques, I know that my OH isn't keen on interviews and well as many other people and that is how it seemed to her on the day.
It was explained to her after the test that all the examiner wants to do is get a feel for your spoken English, and that is why they bombard you with questions, she also went on to say don't try to think to much about your answers.
Anyway slightly off topic as she got an 8.5 in speaking anyway.
It was explained to her after the test that all the examiner wants to do is get a feel for your spoken English, and that is why they bombard you with questions, she also went on to say don't try to think to much about your answers.
Anyway slightly off topic as she got an 8.5 in speaking anyway.
#35
Re: IELTS standards sham!
Unfortunately, not everybody has an aptitude for written English. Just because you are a native speaker, it does not make you an expert in written and spoken language skills. It hardly makes the IELTS system a sham. Or maybe you expect an automatic concession.
The exam is there for a reason and has, and will continue to set the benchmark for an acceptable grasp of the English language. If you do not get the correct grades, try harder.
The exam is there for a reason and has, and will continue to set the benchmark for an acceptable grasp of the English language. If you do not get the correct grades, try harder.
#36
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: UK (For now)
Posts: 46
Re: IELTS standards sham!
I have no doubt whatsoever that people who do not have English as their first language should do the test, but people (let me rephrase that) Academic people who have spent 3+ years at an ENGLISH speaking university, who have written thousands of words in dissertations, which may I add IS also marked on grammar, the same people who have spent countless years in their profession using the English language to communicate on a daily basis, should not be required to pass an IELTS exam, and then possibly fail a section of the exam on an IELTS technicality, I believe this is just plain wrong.
Australian's need IELTS to work in the UK, we need it to work in Australia, and that goes for American's and Canadian's too, so if it is a mutually recognised requirement why aren't we except???
#37
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: UK (For now)
Posts: 46
Re: IELTS standards sham!
Unfortunately, not everybody has an aptitude for written English. Just because you are a native speaker, it does not make you an expert in written and spoken language skills. It hardly makes the IE$LTS system a sham. Or maybe you expect an automatic concession.
The exam is there for a reason and has, and will continue to set the benchmark for an acceptable grasp of the English language. If you do not get the correct grades, try harder.
The exam is there for a reason and has, and will continue to set the benchmark for an acceptable grasp of the English language. If you do not get the correct grades, try harder.
And to answer the other part of your question, yes I do believe that these people warrant a concession from the IELTS, as I feel it is a little unfair how firstly the overall IELTS score of my OH which was an 8.0 is not even considered, as the scores need to be at least a 7.0 in all sections of the test to register as a nurse in Oz, so if somebody did get a 7.0 in all parts of the test then the overall score will still be a 7.0 which would grant you registration! So to clarify you could
register with a 7.0 overall score but obviously not an 8.0 overall, go figure I really do think the overall score of the IELTS should come into play when we are talking about nursing registration purposes.
Last edited by pigwhocouldfly; Aug 31st 2010 at 11:25 am.
#38
Re: IELTS standards sham!
Like I have already explained moneypenny, we have spoken to people in the medical profession who have passed their IELTS who still find it difficult to communicate in English, that being speaking or writing. So obviously something is wrong somewhere in my opinion.
I have no doubt whatsoever that people who do not have English as their first language should do the test, but people (let me rephrase that) Academic people who have spent 3+ years at an ENGLISH speaking university, who have written thousands of words in dissertations, which may I add IS also marked on grammar, the same people who have spent countless years in their profession using the English language to communicate on a daily basis, should not be required to pass an IELTS exam, and then possibly fail a section of the exam on an IELTS technicality, I believe this is just plain wrong.
Australian's need IELTS to work in the UK, we need it to work in Australia, and that goes for American's and Canadian's too, so if it is a mutually recognised requirement why aren't we except???
I have no doubt whatsoever that people who do not have English as their first language should do the test, but people (let me rephrase that) Academic people who have spent 3+ years at an ENGLISH speaking university, who have written thousands of words in dissertations, which may I add IS also marked on grammar, the same people who have spent countless years in their profession using the English language to communicate on a daily basis, should not be required to pass an IELTS exam, and then possibly fail a section of the exam on an IELTS technicality, I believe this is just plain wrong.
Australian's need IELTS to work in the UK, we need it to work in Australia, and that goes for American's and Canadian's too, so if it is a mutually recognised requirement why aren't we except???
I drove for about 20+ years in the UK. I then moved here and had to do a theory test. I failed it. Does that mean the test is wrong and that I obviously shouldn't have had to do the test? Err, no sorry. It meant that I had to pull my finger out, practice a bit harder and retake the test until I passed.
No one has a right to something just because they think they do.
Also, whilst I dislike the grammar police pointing out errors in posts, considering the topic, I have to say that were I an IELTS tester, and you wrote the quoted text as your test, I'd have failed you, but maybe I'm a sham as well.
#39
Re: IELTS standards sham!
There should be no apostrophe in Australians Americans or Canadians. They are plurals, not possessive nor contractions, so therefore no apostrophe.
#40
Re: IELTS standards sham!
I believe my OH does have a very good aptitude for written English, otherwise she would not possess a Bsc(Hons) degree in nursing, taught in an English university.
#41
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: UK (For now)
Posts: 46
Re: IELTS standards sham!
But I am talking about a language that is recognised in every English speaking country, so your argument does not stack up.
#42
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: UK (For now)
Posts: 46
Re: IELTS standards sham!
in nursing cannot be obtained through not having a good concept of the English language when taught in English.
Also a number of years in the nursing profession in the UK should count for something, after all people's lives are at stake.
Last edited by pigwhocouldfly; Aug 31st 2010 at 12:04 pm.
#43
Home and Happy
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Keep true friends and puppets close, trust no-one else...
Posts: 93,816
Re: IELTS standards sham!
If the UK insists on Australian nurses passing IELTS in order to work there, then it really is perfectly fair that UK nurses should have to pass in order to work here. And after all, both countries have large parts of their populations who are not fluent in English.
#44
Re: IELTS standards sham!
The point I am trying to make is calling the system to account for the failure to reach a certain grade is arrogant to say the least. Just because someone has reached an academic level in any given profession does not assure them of the required level of written communication in an IELTS exam.
You wife should have just sucked it up and knuckled down and concentrated on her weak area. Rather than that, you want to bitch and moan about the fact that an English native has to sit a written and verbal literacy test.
You wife should have just sucked it up and knuckled down and concentrated on her weak area. Rather than that, you want to bitch and moan about the fact that an English native has to sit a written and verbal literacy test.
#45
Re: IELTS standards sham!
No, you should have to do the theory test as you would be driving in a different country moneypenny, ie there are totally different rules on the roads and different signage etc. But you drive there so you should know!
But I am talking about a language that is recognised in every English speaking country, so your argument does not stack up.
But I am talking about a language that is recognised in every English speaking country, so your argument does not stack up.