High Court rules Australia must take asylum seekers
#181
Forum Regular
Joined: May 2004
Location: South wales (the old one :-)
Posts: 96
Re: High Court rules Australia must take asylum seekers
erm...........the UK is over-run with immigrants, and to a very detrimental effect
read the newspaper stories, 80+ percent of viiolent crimes / muggings are caused by ethnic minorities
of all the crimes, more than half are committed by people who's second language is English
look at the stats on TB, HIV, and all the other 'third world' diseases, 'outbreak' centers closely match distribution centers for immigrants
UK is totally FOOBAR now,
http://members.ebay.co.uk/aboutme/bleugh
read the newspaper stories, 80+ percent of viiolent crimes / muggings are caused by ethnic minorities
of all the crimes, more than half are committed by people who's second language is English
look at the stats on TB, HIV, and all the other 'third world' diseases, 'outbreak' centers closely match distribution centers for immigrants
UK is totally FOOBAR now,
http://members.ebay.co.uk/aboutme/bleugh
#182
Re: High Court rules Australia must take asylum seekers
Originally Posted by BAY
NO, its just that your analogy isn't valid.
Anyone can read up on facts and figures but only someone who lives in a certain area can tell what its like to live there.
Anyone can read up on facts and figures but only someone who lives in a certain area can tell what its like to live there.
Originally Posted by BAY
Try this : can the person from Singapore if he has never visited Old Trafford tell you what that the atmosphere is like at Old trafford, what its like to be part of a 60,000 crowd, what it smells like, etc etc. ?
What if the guy in Singapore is a Manc?
#183
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 244
Re: High Court rules Australia must take asylum seekers
Originally Posted by bondipom
What are you on about?
why does it matter that people skip a few nations before claiming assylum in the UK?
What does it matter if I move into your home and claim I cannot afford to buy one. Like I said its about values. If you dont understand that...it explains why you make comments such as the quote above.
I also mentioned in an ealier post that in the Oz airports I passed through in 2003/2004, there were posters explaning why "asylum seekers" cannot pass through safe countries.
I wonder if I could walk into Sydney airport and say...I,m fed up waiting for you lot to sort out a visa application, my life is in danger in England...cos if I dont get my wife into Oz so she can be near her only blood relative on this planet she may just crack up and whack me with an axe I,m here...where do I get some handouts?
What do you reckon the outcome will be?
#184
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 244
Re: High Court rules Australia must take asylum seekers
Originally Posted by NedKelly
If it could be guaranteed that they would all go to the Kimberleys or some other empty part of Australia I would be all for it.
#185
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,149
Re: High Court rules Australia must take asylum seekers
Originally Posted by Vinny van Gogh
.....This from your post - which I suggest you read again.
why does it matter that people skip a few nations before claiming assylum in the UK?
What does it matter if I move into your home and claim I cannot afford to buy one. Like I said its about values. If you dont understand that...it explains why you make comments such as the quote above.
I also mentioned in an ealier post that in the Oz airports I passed through in 2003/2004, there were posters explaning why "asylum seekers" cannot pass through safe countries.
I wonder if I could walk into Sydney airport and say...I,m fed up waiting for you lot to sort out a visa application, my life is in danger in England...cos if I dont get my wife into Oz so she can be near her only blood relative on this planet she may just crack up and whack me with an axe I,m here...where do I get some handouts?
What do you reckon the outcome will be?
why does it matter that people skip a few nations before claiming assylum in the UK?
What does it matter if I move into your home and claim I cannot afford to buy one. Like I said its about values. If you dont understand that...it explains why you make comments such as the quote above.
I also mentioned in an ealier post that in the Oz airports I passed through in 2003/2004, there were posters explaning why "asylum seekers" cannot pass through safe countries.
I wonder if I could walk into Sydney airport and say...I,m fed up waiting for you lot to sort out a visa application, my life is in danger in England...cos if I dont get my wife into Oz so she can be near her only blood relative on this planet she may just crack up and whack me with an axe I,m here...where do I get some handouts?
What do you reckon the outcome will be?
I cannot afford a home here or in the SE of the UK. I blame Alex Ferguson on that one. All those bloody Man U fans not in Manchester.
BTW Australians and Brits cannot claim asylum in each others countries. When you get here there are plenty of handouts available if you are a permanent resident. Illegal migrants are not entitled to welfare in the UK and I wouldn't want the life of an asylum seeker, not allowed to work yet stuck in a system that is clogged up.
#186
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,149
Re: High Court rules Australia must take asylum seekers
Originally Posted by bleugh
erm...........the UK is over-run with immigrants, and to a very detrimental effect
read the newspaper stories, 80+ percent of viiolent crimes / muggings are caused by ethnic minorities
of all the crimes, more than half are committed by people who's second language is English
look at the stats on TB, HIV, and all the other 'third world' diseases, 'outbreak' centers closely match distribution centers for immigrants
UK is totally FOOBAR now,
http://members.ebay.co.uk/aboutme/bleugh
read the newspaper stories, 80+ percent of viiolent crimes / muggings are caused by ethnic minorities
of all the crimes, more than half are committed by people who's second language is English
look at the stats on TB, HIV, and all the other 'third world' diseases, 'outbreak' centers closely match distribution centers for immigrants
UK is totally FOOBAR now,
http://members.ebay.co.uk/aboutme/bleugh
#187
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,149
Re: High Court rules Australia must take asylum seekers
Originally Posted by jc_hoops
Wow, link to a dictionary........
Now all you need to do, is make a few more links that can translate how you equate football, to the subject that was being discussed between BP, me and a few others on this thread ?
Now all you need to do, is make a few more links that can translate how you equate football, to the subject that was being discussed between BP, me and a few others on this thread ?
#188
Re: High Court rules Australia must take asylum seekers
Originally Posted by HiddenPaw
Yep, totally agree with this.
So you are saying that BondiPom has never been to or lived in the UK. Do you think the 'Pom' bit in his username is a giveaway or just a decoy?
What if the guy in Singapore is a Manc?
So you are saying that BondiPom has never been to or lived in the UK. Do you think the 'Pom' bit in his username is a giveaway or just a decoy?
What if the guy in Singapore is a Manc?
#189
Re: High Court rules Australia must take asylum seekers
I watch the news and see these people protesting outside the Australian detention centres and I have to shrug. Australians do not know what it’s like to live in a country that it is no longer unable to support it’s population. These ‘bleeding-hearts’ want to open the flood gates and allow anyone and everyone into their country. This must be because these ‘bleeding hearts’ don’t know what it would be like to live in a place that has no dole and appx 35-40% unemployment. This is the situation that faces many countries but I am refering to South Africa in particular. Hearing about illegal immigrants being thrown from trains or stabbed with machetes is a fairly common occurrence. It is no coincidence that the apartheid government choose to build the Kruger National Park between SA and Mozambique and you do hear stories of people being eaten by lions or trampled by hippos. Of course there are genuine asylum seekers and these people need to be heard and kept in humane conditions but the idea of just letting in any ol’ body willy nilly is ludicrous. I appreciate that the I am an immigrant but the bottom line is that S.Africa is facing a ‘brain drain’, where skilled workers are leaving and being replaced with illegal or unskilled workers.
I know generally speaking Amanda Van Stone is seen as some Nazi bitch from hell but one really bad recession and I am pretty sure your average Aussie will be singing a different tune
I know generally speaking Amanda Van Stone is seen as some Nazi bitch from hell but one really bad recession and I am pretty sure your average Aussie will be singing a different tune
#190
Re: High Court rules Australia must take asylum seekers
Originally Posted by bleugh
erm...........the UK is over-run with immigrants, and to a very detrimental effect
read the newspaper stories, 80+ percent of viiolent crimes / muggings are caused by ethnic minorities
of all the crimes, more than half are committed by people who's second language is English
look at the stats on TB, HIV, and all the other 'third world' diseases, 'outbreak' centers closely match distribution centers for immigrants
UK is totally FOOBAR now,
read the newspaper stories, 80+ percent of viiolent crimes / muggings are caused by ethnic minorities
of all the crimes, more than half are committed by people who's second language is English
look at the stats on TB, HIV, and all the other 'third world' diseases, 'outbreak' centers closely match distribution centers for immigrants
UK is totally FOOBAR now,
Can I expect to see some evidence to back this rant up or should I just delete the post now?
#191
Banned
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: from Shepherds Bush to Aussie Bush. Well not quite - Mountain Creek, Sunshine Coast
Posts: 187
Re: High Court rules Australia must take asylum seekers
Originally Posted by bondipom
A few smilies don't make you funny and this is an open forum and an open discussion.
I'm not trying to be funny, just laughing at that statement
Stop referring to the tabloids that, "we" are all supposed to read, coz I don't read none, I get most of my current affair info from the BBC site.
Now - one more time, where are these mates of yours that live in London again, don't remember you answering that one yet ?
One other question while on this subject, what inner London Borough are you from, because you have all the answers, so you must have had a life full of the problems that we are currently now suffering from?
I would hate to think that all your crap is just gained from the Net
#192
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,149
Re: High Court rules Australia must take asylum seekers
Originally Posted by jc_hoops
Oh BP...
I'm not trying to be funny, just laughing at that statement
Stop referring to the tabloids that, "we" are all supposed to read, coz I don't read none, I get most of my current affair info from the BBC site.
Now - one more time, where are these mates of yours that live in London again, don't remember you answering that one yet ?
One other question while on this subject, what inner London Borough are you from, because you have all the answers, so you must have had a life full of the problems that we are currently now suffering from?
I would hate to think that all your crap is just gained from the Net
I'm not trying to be funny, just laughing at that statement
Stop referring to the tabloids that, "we" are all supposed to read, coz I don't read none, I get most of my current affair info from the BBC site.
Now - one more time, where are these mates of yours that live in London again, don't remember you answering that one yet ?
One other question while on this subject, what inner London Borough are you from, because you have all the answers, so you must have had a life full of the problems that we are currently now suffering from?
I would hate to think that all your crap is just gained from the Net
#193
Re: High Court rules Australia must take asylum seekers
Originally Posted by NedKelly
It took me and I am sure a lot of other people on this board a lot of time, money, sweat, worry and stress to get to this country. Perhaps I should have taken the easy route and come here as a tourist and then claimed asylum.
http://www.optusnet.com.au/news/stor...ic/1314151.inp
http://www.optusnet.com.au/news/stor...ic/1314151.inp
Sounds a hell of lot abetter than the imprisonment, murder, rape, torture and starvation that most refugees are trying to escape from.
You're obviously poorly educated, they're the only people who ever complain about refugees.
#194
Re: High Court rules Australia must take asylum seekers
Originally Posted by bondipom
This thread has deteriorated ....