![]() |
Re: Election
Originally Posted by Amazulu
(Post 5455596)
The near 60% support for the Liberals in this poll is interesting and is in complete contrast to national polls.
I think it's because many poms have seen the cock-up that a quasi-socialist, namby-pamby government has made in the UK and realise that a KRudd/Gillard government will do the same here. Heaven help us. Did I vote? ... oh yeh so I did ... bugger, it's blown my argument then :D |
Re: Election
Originally Posted by renth
(Post 5455768)
Vote Howard and get 25 nuclear power stations
Even if Australia switches off everything, China will make up for the reduction in CO2 within a six weeks. That's why Krudds whole climate change electioneering is a load of bollox. |
Re: Election
Originally Posted by NedKelly
(Post 5455817)
Then we could sell more coal to China, after all they a building a power station a week, or something like that.
Even if Australia switches off everything, China will make up for the reduction in CO2 within a six weeks. That's why Krudds whole climate change electioneering is a load of bollox. |
Re: Election
Originally Posted by renth
(Post 5455956)
I agree that unless we can get China, India and America to stop polluting anything we do is a drop in the ocean. Therefore let's try to go for clean coal power and leave the uranium where it belongs - in the ground.
|
Re: Election
Originally Posted by Amazulu
(Post 5455964)
Clean coal is part of the solution but only part. If you want a booming economy with zero emissions then it will need to be a combination of nukes, clean coal, gas, solar, wind and wave.
|
Re: Election
Originally Posted by renth
(Post 5455969)
I'll take some emissions and leave the nuclear thanks.
|
Re: Election
Originally Posted by renth
(Post 5455956)
I agree that unless we can get China, India and America to stop polluting anything we do is a drop in the ocean. Therefore let's try to go for clean coal power and leave the uranium where it belongs - in the ground.
|
Re: Election
Originally Posted by NedKelly
(Post 5456004)
That does raise a good point. What is the point in going nuclear when the amount of CO2 we generate is minimal. I don't even see the point in bothering with clean coal for domestic consumption, unless we can sell it to the Chinese.
|
Re: Election
But if we develop the technology it will be very valuable when China India and the USA eventually jump on the band wagon.
Originally Posted by renth
(Post 5455956)
I agree that unless we can get China, India and America to stop polluting anything we do is a drop in the ocean. Therefore let's try to go for clean coal power and leave the uranium where it belongs - in the ground.
|
Re: Election
Where's the "Who cares" option? :zzz:
|
Re: Election
Originally Posted by The Bloke
(Post 5456440)
Where's the "Who cares" option? :zzz:
its your responsibility as Australian. |
Re: Election
Originally Posted by NewOZ
(Post 5500242)
even if you dont care you still have to vote
its your responsibility as Australian. |
Re: Election
Originally Posted by NedKelly
(Post 5500340)
Are you allowed to deface your ballot paper and write obscenities on it like they do in the UK?
|
Re: Election
And, while we're on the subject - can anyone explain the preference voting system?
(Use extra paper if required) It sounds as deliberately obfuscating (now *there's* a favourite word <g>) as Medicare.... |
Re: Election
Originally Posted by smee
(Post 5500352)
As I understand it. Your vote will be classed as a donkey vote and will therefore go to the governing party, ie Librals
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 3:44 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.