Completely confused!
#31
Re: Completely confused!
There was a case a few years ago where a couple of young English migrants (I think they were PR) committed a serious assault in Perth and after being found guilty were deported. I can't remember if they did their time first because that is usually the case
One of the great things that Australia does is deport foreign criminals - even if they have lived here nearly all their lives. A hard line is definitely taken. For instance, there are currently about 1000 NZ citizens facing removal - something that has upset the NZ PM. Tough shit Key, they're out of here. Kiwis can come here with no questions asked, so if they act like assholes, kick `em out
I don't think that this relates to the OP though (which is why I haven't quoted her)
One of the great things that Australia does is deport foreign criminals - even if they have lived here nearly all their lives. A hard line is definitely taken. For instance, there are currently about 1000 NZ citizens facing removal - something that has upset the NZ PM. Tough shit Key, they're out of here. Kiwis can come here with no questions asked, so if they act like assholes, kick `em out
I don't think that this relates to the OP though (which is why I haven't quoted her)
#32
Home and Happy
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Keep true friends and puppets close, trust no-one else...
Posts: 93,815
Re: Completely confused!
Bail? In Australia? That's a UK thing isn't it? In Australia you get a court notice I believe. Either way in both countries neither prevent you from travelling unless they take you passport if they consider you a flight risk. This rarely happens.
By the sound of it, first conviction, no damage to the other person. If the lawyer gets going I suspect a section 10. No conviction.
By the sound of it, first conviction, no damage to the other person. If the lawyer gets going I suspect a section 10. No conviction.
#34
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2015
Location: Newbury
Posts: 186
Re: Completely confused!
Bail is used quite a lot in the UK. From what I know, they let him out the next morning and gave him a court date. So I guess it would be a court notice
#35
Re: Completely confused!
The Police can also apply other bail conditions such as 'Must reside at XYZ address' or 'Must have no contact with ABC person' (usually the aggrieved). Only in very serious cases will Police seek to seize a passport, and an alternative is making a person report to a specified police station on a regular basis.
Bail can also be used as a period when the Police can release a suspect with a view to gathering additional evidence and then re-interviewing them at a later time. This is known as Police Bail, rather than court Bail, and the same conditions can still be applied, though the suspect will be bailed to return to the Police Station rather than a court.
The circumstances here make this sound very much like a common assault, and is probably at the very low end of the scale. In the UK, this could have been dealt with by way of a caution had the offence been admitted. not sure which state the OP's BF is in here, so difficult to decide what legislation this will be covered by.
Always get legal advice - even if it's only from the duty solicitor.
S
#36
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 14,040
Re: Completely confused!
Bail is used both here and in the UK as an alternative to remanding in custody after a person has been charged. It is from the bail that the police will derive the power of arrest if you fail to attend the court at the specified time - this is known as a breach of bail conditions, and the ramifications of breaking these conditions can be serious.
The Police can also apply other bail conditions such as 'Must reside at XYZ address' or 'Must have no contact with ABC person' (usually the aggrieved). Only in very serious cases will Police seek to seize a passport, and an alternative is making a person report to a specified police station on a regular basis.
Bail can also be used as a period when the Police can release a suspect with a view to gathering additional evidence and then re-interviewing them at a later time. This is known as Police Bail, rather than court Bail, and the same conditions can still be applied, though the suspect will be bailed to return to the Police Station rather than a court.
The circumstances here make this sound very much like a common assault, and is probably at the very low end of the scale. In the UK, this could have been dealt with by way of a caution had the offence been admitted. not sure which state the OP's BF is in here, so difficult to decide what legislation this will be covered by.
Always get legal advice - even if it's only from the duty solicitor.
S
The Police can also apply other bail conditions such as 'Must reside at XYZ address' or 'Must have no contact with ABC person' (usually the aggrieved). Only in very serious cases will Police seek to seize a passport, and an alternative is making a person report to a specified police station on a regular basis.
Bail can also be used as a period when the Police can release a suspect with a view to gathering additional evidence and then re-interviewing them at a later time. This is known as Police Bail, rather than court Bail, and the same conditions can still be applied, though the suspect will be bailed to return to the Police Station rather than a court.
The circumstances here make this sound very much like a common assault, and is probably at the very low end of the scale. In the UK, this could have been dealt with by way of a caution had the offence been admitted. not sure which state the OP's BF is in here, so difficult to decide what legislation this will be covered by.
Always get legal advice - even if it's only from the duty solicitor.
S
#37
Re: Completely confused!
Yup. A lot of contrition and humbleness would go a long way to help here.
S
#40
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2015
Location: Newbury
Posts: 186
Re: Completely confused!
Thanks guys, I really appreciate your responses.
He knows he's done it so I woke have thought guilty th plea is definitely the way to go. He's not the sort of person to go around doing this on a daily basis so humbleness definitely comes in to it. He said as soon as it happened that he shouldn't have done it.
Swerv-o, do you mean state as in part of the country? He's in Adelaide so SA
He knows he's done it so I woke have thought guilty th plea is definitely the way to go. He's not the sort of person to go around doing this on a daily basis so humbleness definitely comes in to it. He said as soon as it happened that he shouldn't have done it.
Swerv-o, do you mean state as in part of the country? He's in Adelaide so SA
#41
Home and Happy
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Keep true friends and puppets close, trust no-one else...
Posts: 93,815
Re: Completely confused!
Thanks guys, I really appreciate your responses.
He knows he's done it so I woke have thought guilty th plea is definitely the way to go. He's not the sort of person to go around doing this on a daily basis so humbleness definitely comes in to it. He said as soon as it happened that he shouldn't have done it.
Swerv-o, do you mean state as in part of the country? He's in Adelaide so SA
He knows he's done it so I woke have thought guilty th plea is definitely the way to go. He's not the sort of person to go around doing this on a daily basis so humbleness definitely comes in to it. He said as soon as it happened that he shouldn't have done it.
Swerv-o, do you mean state as in part of the country? He's in Adelaide so SA
#42
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2015
Location: Newbury
Posts: 186
Re: Completely confused!
Hi All!I know this is quite late after the final thread but just wanted to give you all an update. My boyfriend went to court and ended up with a $2000 fine, reduced to $1600, reason why i am not aware of. He was spared 2 weeks in prison, again, not sure why but i believe it could be due to him coming home 10 days after the court date, first offence, showing remorse etc. He is now paying $50 a week until i can get out there permanatently and help with the bills etc where he will be able to pay a bigger chunk at a time. Thank you for all your responses and help, just thought it might be helpful to post the actual outcome if anyone else ever finds themself in the same situation!
#43
Home and Happy
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Keep true friends and puppets close, trust no-one else...
Posts: 93,815
Re: Completely confused!
Hi All!I know this is quite late after the final thread but just wanted to give you all an update. My boyfriend went to court and ended up with a $2000 fine, reduced to $1600, reason why i am not aware of. He was spared 2 weeks in prison, again, not sure why but i believe it could be due to him coming home 10 days after the court date, first offence, showing remorse etc. He is now paying $50 a week until i can get out there permanatently and help with the bills etc where he will be able to pay a bigger chunk at a time. Thank you for all your responses and help, just thought it might be helpful to post the actual outcome if anyone else ever finds themself in the same situation!
I guess his main issue now will be when he actually applies for PR, and how they view his conviction at that time. I'd suggest gettng a good registered agent on the case then.
#44
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2015
Location: Newbury
Posts: 186
Re: Completely confused!
Yes, he is now finding out about the repercussions. He was stopped when he was leaving and re-entering Australia when he came back for a visit in November. I think his lawyer said because it was just a fine there shouldn't be any problems but we shall see. I believe the plan is to wait until i can also apply for my PR so we can cut the cost and do it together so that wont be for a few years yet!
#45
Re: Completely confused!
Bail (and arrest, for that matter) seems to be used very differently in Britain. It sometimes seemed like half the country was on police bail or being arrested on the vaguest of suspicions - i.e. the cops just wanted to have a chat. Here they would usually just say someone was "helping police with their inquiries", unless they had actually been charged and were awaiting court.