![]() |
Re: Australians by ancesty
Originally Posted by nickyc
?
Those figures show Australians by ancestry. It's got nothing to do with numbers of permanent residents vs citizens. Someone whose great-great grandfather was British would have British ancestry - but that same person could also be a fifth-generation Australian. People with British ancestry could have had ancestors that arrived with the first fleet - or they could have flown in last week. Considering that 25% of the population are supposedly immigrants or children of immigrants (and currently British migrants only make up around 10% of the whole) it shows that an awful lot the 36.5% of the population claiming British ancestry are looking back much further than two generations. This file provides a closer look at the ancestry figures. An example follows: Ancestry: English Both parents born in Australia: 3,676,348 Mother Australian-born/Father born overseas: 541,061 Father Australian-born/Mother born overseas: 374,790 Both parents born overseas: 364,594 Parent(s') birthplace not stated: 113,170 Total overseas born: 1,143,371 The results for people claiming Irish ancestry are similar, but with a lower percentage of parents born overseas: Ancestry: Irish Both parents born in Australia: 1,335,193 Mother Australian-born/Father born overseas: 145,001 Father Australian-born/Mother born overseas: 89,141 Both parents born overseas: 67,535 Parent(s) birthplace not stated: 30,955 Total overseas born: 212,179 Ancestry: Welsh Both parents born in Australia: 29,686 Mother Australian-born/Father born overseas: 8,178 Father Australian-born/Mother born overseas: 4,789 Both parents born overseas: 7,850 Parent(s') birthplace not stated: 989 Total overseas born: 31,556 I fall into the category of people born with English ancestry; my father was English and England-born, while my mother is Australian and Australian-born, though her own father was English and England-born. :cool: |
Re: Australians by ancesty
Originally Posted by Vash the Stampede
For anyone who's interested, some interesting demographics data from the 2001 Census:
Total population: 21 million Australian: 6.7m (38.7%) English: 6.4m (36.5%) Irish: 1.9m (11%) Italian: 800,000 (4.6%) German: 742,000 (4.3%) Chinese: 557,000 (3.2%) Scottish: 540,000 (3.1%) Greek: 376,000 (2.2%) Dutch: 269,000 (1.5%) Lebanese: 162,000 (0.9%) Indian: 157,000 (0.9%) Vietnamese: 157,000 (0.9%) Polish: 151,000 (0.9%) It could probably (with devlopment) take double the people it has now, and because it was discovered so late in the grand scheme of things, its never going to have a majority of natives, you could argue that there is no real natives of australia. doesnt 38.7% make them a minority in their country anyway? it just makes them the mode right? ;) |
Re: Australians by ancesty
Originally Posted by Liamruscoe
Strictly speaking OZ is a new island that is still being colonised at a steady rate.
It could probably (with devlopment) take double the people it has now, and because it was discovered so late in the grand scheme of things, its never going to have a majority of natives, you could argue that there is no real natives of australia. doesnt 38.7% make them a minority in their country anyway? it just makes them the mode right? ;) |
Re: Australians by ancesty
Originally Posted by Hutch
And neither have you re: the 'United' Kingdom.
Yea, and why would that not be any different in Australia, Sherlock? Who's to say that a third generation English/Australian doesn't regard him/herself as Australian. Just because the time-frame is shorter, doesn't make it un-true. Yea, and according to the UK census data, and my own experience of living in the UK for several decades, you would be hard-pushed to find any "cultural diversity" outside the major UK cities (including that crime-free nirvana you commute to from the melting pot that is Harpenden) - unless you count different types of white, anglo-saxon, indolent, feeble-minded, self-serving, pseudo-intellectual, NIMBYs. And that would be blatently misleading. PS Time you put some suntan lotion on that neck of yours. |
Re: Australians by ancesty
Originally Posted by Vash the Stampede
Well, there's the Aborigines! :confused:
... |
Re: Australians by ancesty
Originally Posted by MikeStanton
That would be blatently misleading.
Originally Posted by MikeStanton
Time you put some suntan lotion on...
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 12:24 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.