![]() |
Re: Another attack on the 457 Visa
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 10733264)
Correct. But the 457 holder can voice their disapproval by leaving Australia.
|
Re: Another attack on the 457 Visa
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 10733264)
Correct. But the 457 holder can voice their disapproval by leaving Australia.
|
Re: Another attack on the 457 Visa
Originally Posted by spouse of scouse
(Post 10733683)
That's right, they could. Someone from, say, the UK might. But someone from India may very well not. The choice between little or no pay, and a relatively high wage, isn't much of a choice. A 457 visa holder isn't responsible for controlling entry, wages and conditions. It's the old hierarchy of needs thing - if you're worried about making enough money to feed and house your family, you're not going to be too concerned about the politics or economics of immigration.
There would be 2 things that happen along the way that may prevent this from happening. 1. The Indian does their research and understands that living on a low salary in Australia is not a wise move and therefore rejects the offer. 2. The government rejects the visa application as their are already individuals living in Australia capable of doing the job. |
Re: Another attack on the 457 Visa
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 10733691)
I can't quite figure out your point, but if you are suggesting employers might start using 457's to employ cheap labour from India then I think that's a incredibly sensible business decision.
There would be 2 things that happen along the way that may prevent this from happening. 1. The Indian does their research and understands that living on a low salary in Australia is not a wise move and therefore rejects the offer. 2. The government rejects the visa application as their are already individuals living in Australia capable of doing the job. Actually, I suppose I was making a point, and I'll make it again. 457 visa holders don't write the legislation, nor are they responsible for policing it. Their only responsibility is to abide by the conditions of their visa. The fact that they can leave if they don't like the job, for whatever reason, doesn't shift responsibility from the government one iota. |
Re: Another attack on the 457 Visa
So, if Australia does move into a period of higher unemployment, would there be a case for scrapping the 457, except for in the most difficult of roles to fill?
The idea that the IT industry, for example, still needs 457's a bit of a joke. |
Re: Another attack on the 457 Visa
Originally Posted by iamthecreaturefromuranus
(Post 10733713)
So, if Australia does move into a period of higher unemployment, would there be a case for scrapping the 457, except for in the most difficult of roles to fill?
The idea that the IT industry, for example, still needs 457's a bit of a joke. |
Re: Another attack on the 457 Visa
Originally Posted by iamthecreaturefromuranus
(Post 10733713)
So, if Australia does move into a period of higher unemployment, would there be a case for scrapping the 457, except for in the most difficult of roles to fill?
The idea that the IT industry, for example, still needs 457's a bit of a joke. |
Re: Another attack on the 457 Visa
Originally Posted by spouse of scouse
(Post 10733683)
A 457 visa holder isn't responsible for controlling entry, wages and conditions.
|
Re: Another attack on the 457 Visa
Originally Posted by roaringmouse
(Post 10734167)
Wouldn't that be a part of them negotiating their contract with the sponsoring company?
I could be missing something though, I don't profess to be a full bottle on the subject. :) |
Re: Another attack on the 457 Visa
Originally Posted by verystormy
(Post 10732287)
But, just playing devils advocate here, salaries in Oz have become extortionate. I know of at least two major mines in Oz that are under review of closure which if they were paying the same salaries as Canada, Europe or Asia would be profitable. So, can we blame the companies for trying to rebalance Oz excess.
|
Re: Another attack on the 457 Visa
Especially where the mines are.
Oz mining is successful because it can pay the wages and be profitable. Gina may lament she cannot pay African wages but I see no point in a peanut paying industry.
Originally Posted by Amazulu
(Post 10735280)
I've never understood this argument. The cost of labour is a product of the availability of labour. The US and Europe have more people, higher unemployment, therefore wages are generally lower. We have a small population with lots if resource projects/operations. No profitable business pays more for labour than they have to
|
Re: Another attack on the 457 Visa
No as there are specialists that Australia does not have or does not have the capability of developing. I am not talking IT. Medicine is the prime one. The main thing is to set the bar high and meet a genuine skill gap. Too often the scheme is used the make up for inadequate training and development.
Originally Posted by iamthecreaturefromuranus
(Post 10733713)
So, if Australia does move into a period of higher unemployment, would there be a case for scrapping the 457, except for in the most difficult of roles to fill?
The idea that the IT industry, for example, still needs 457's a bit of a joke. |
Re: Another attack on the 457 Visa
Originally Posted by Dreamy
(Post 10733581)
Or getting PR, then citizenship and being able to have a say. Supposedly.
I wonder what the conversion rate of 457s to permanent visas is? Obviously I'm not wondering enough to have a google :) |
Re: Another attack on the 457 Visa
Originally Posted by spouse of scouse
(Post 10734184)
I would think it's the government's responsibility to make sure employers are providing at least minimum wages and conditions, and to prosecute if those aren't being met. Of course a 457 visa holder can negotiate wages and conditions, but it's not a responsibility.
I could be missing something though, I don't profess to be a full bottle on the subject. :) Under that figure and the employer cannot sponsor a 457 applicant, |
Re: Another attack on the 457 Visa
Originally Posted by ABCD......
(Post 10735456)
The current minimum market rate salary to be able to apply for 457 applicants is $51,400 annual. This will rise next month.
Under that figure and the employer cannot sponsor a 457 applicant, |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 5:32 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.