"Neater Heaters"
#46
Banned
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Mallorca
Posts: 19,367
Re: "Neater Heaters"
I've always wondered...
Forced air heating/cooling have always been the most effective in terms of comfort; they not only heat/cool cleanly, with circulated air, but also clean the air of dust, pet dander, and other particles in the process (provided you install a cheap and simple filter). You can see a visible difference in the dust that collects on your furnishings. They facilitate cheap and easy after-the-fact addition of air conditioning, too.
It's not expensive to install when building or refurbishing a house, but the ductwork needs to be installed as a core part of the building's infrastructure, so obviously, not a viable option unless you're ripping into your home from the ground up. Although you can install surface ductwork and then cover it up with plasterboard or something - less desirable, but it works.
I remember having forced air heat in England (and it was lovely), and AFAIK, it's the common standard in the US.
But here in Spain (and most of Europe, really), I see it's always commercial buildings, not dwellings that have it. Dwellings almost always have radiated heat, which is less desirable for all those reasons. I am confused as to why radiated heat is the standard, and why forced air heating is so difficult to find. I can't believe the cost differential is that great.
Forced air is equally or more economical and provides far better results -- as long as you build it in from the start. I would think especially in dusty Spain, forced air would be the method of choice for new builds and complete refurbs.
Forced air heating/cooling have always been the most effective in terms of comfort; they not only heat/cool cleanly, with circulated air, but also clean the air of dust, pet dander, and other particles in the process (provided you install a cheap and simple filter). You can see a visible difference in the dust that collects on your furnishings. They facilitate cheap and easy after-the-fact addition of air conditioning, too.
It's not expensive to install when building or refurbishing a house, but the ductwork needs to be installed as a core part of the building's infrastructure, so obviously, not a viable option unless you're ripping into your home from the ground up. Although you can install surface ductwork and then cover it up with plasterboard or something - less desirable, but it works.
I remember having forced air heat in England (and it was lovely), and AFAIK, it's the common standard in the US.
But here in Spain (and most of Europe, really), I see it's always commercial buildings, not dwellings that have it. Dwellings almost always have radiated heat, which is less desirable for all those reasons. I am confused as to why radiated heat is the standard, and why forced air heating is so difficult to find. I can't believe the cost differential is that great.
Forced air is equally or more economical and provides far better results -- as long as you build it in from the start. I would think especially in dusty Spain, forced air would be the method of choice for new builds and complete refurbs.
#47
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 827
Re: "Neater Heaters"
No-one has yet mentioned under floor heating.
I have no idea how efficient it is but we rented a property in Portugal one week in the winter time and the under floor heating was an absolute delight. Just to pad around on warm floor tiles in bare feet was such a pleasure. The entire room was cosy, no cold or hot spots anywhere. Would love heating like that in my old Spanish house.
I have no idea how efficient it is but we rented a property in Portugal one week in the winter time and the under floor heating was an absolute delight. Just to pad around on warm floor tiles in bare feet was such a pleasure. The entire room was cosy, no cold or hot spots anywhere. Would love heating like that in my old Spanish house.
#48
BE Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 982
Re: "Neater Heaters"
Thanks for the above.
Would wall mounted inverter air-con units come under the definition of forced air?
Would wall mounted inverter air-con units come under the definition of forced air?
#49
Banned
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Mallorca
Posts: 19,367
Re: "Neater Heaters"
I've been hearing some good things about those wall-mounted heat pumps and their efficiency. Unfortunately, they are electric, which in Spain, has a higher cost-per-kilowatt of energy. Gas is still quite a bit cheaper (for heating), even if you have only the usual radiated hot-water heat system. And for what it's worth, assuming electric is somehow better for the environment is like believing that vegetable fat is somehow better than animal fat. Both are still fat.
Still, Insulation is probably the single best investment you can make in terms of heating and cooling. But only recently have Spanish architects & builders begun to consider insulation as important design criteria.
#50
Re: "Neater Heaters"
It hasn't been really cold here (Somerset), down to 3C one night, but so far this modern house doesn't appear to need any heating beyond a quick blast in the morning and evening and we've been too hot in bed (fnar, fnar) in November.
#51
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 483
Re: "Neater Heaters"
The trouble with A/C is it sends out warm air but if the room is any decent size there are lots of cold spots and the overall effect is not "cosy". The nearest we get to "cosy" is if we a have the woodburner roaring away.
#52
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,148
Re: "Neater Heaters"
As I said, wouldn't go with neater heaters. It always depends what type of person you are. Some heating systems will be better for one person, but not so good for the other. We have wall mounted air con units and the air source heat pump absorbs heat from the outside air, so maybe only 1/4 of the heat generated would be electricity costs, but also depends on outside temperature, quality of heat pump. We also have a domestic hot water heat pump and it saves us hundreds a year. Electricity in general isn't bad and can save you money in some cases. An underfloor heating system needs more time to heat, but a downflow heater might do a better job, because you just want instant heat for a few mins. The infrared is a great option in a bathroom, because you'll have a steam free mirror and it's a nicer heat.
#53
Re: "Neater Heaters"
No-one has yet mentioned under floor heating.
I have no idea how efficient it is but we rented a property in Portugal one week in the winter time and the under floor heating was an absolute delight. Just to pad around on warm floor tiles in bare feet was such a pleasure. The entire room was cosy, no cold or hot spots anywhere. Would love heating like that in my old Spanish house.
I have no idea how efficient it is but we rented a property in Portugal one week in the winter time and the under floor heating was an absolute delight. Just to pad around on warm floor tiles in bare feet was such a pleasure. The entire room was cosy, no cold or hot spots anywhere. Would love heating like that in my old Spanish house.
We have 150m2 of underfloor heating in ten separate areas (it was a very cheap deal when we built the house) and if it is all on at the same time it would use 17kw which would probably melt the meter!
We use it in our bedroom and bathroom all through the winter but it is only on for three hours from about 4am. When the weather is cold we turn on the living areas (about 50m2) at the same time. As we are on a dual tariff the cost is reasonable (less than 50% of the normal rate). If the weather is very cold we would give it another two hours before 12am when the meter switches to the day rate.
So, it's no more efficient than any other form of electric heating but it is economical because we can maximise the usage at the cheap rates. It is essentially also a form of heat storage system as the floor retains its heat for at least two hours. In the evening we use the log burner and if we come in late when it's not worth lighting the fire we would use the A/C heating.
#54
Forum Regular
Joined: Aug 2014
Location: Fife, Scotland.
Posts: 130
Re: "Neater Heaters"
He didn't say that. He said "for the same amount of electricity" obviously a hair dryer uses less than a washing machine but actually gives out more heat because its main function is to heat up air. I think what he meant was that type "a" 2kw heater will give out same amount of heat as type "b" 2kw heater
#55
Re: "Neater Heaters"
He didn't say that. He said "for the same amount of electricity" obviously a hair dryer uses less than a washing machine but actually gives out more heat because its main function is to heat up air. I think what he meant was that type "a" 2kw heater will give out same amount of heat as type "b" 2kw heater
Correct - thank you. I thought that what I said was obvious enough but there you go..
#56
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 483
Re: "Neater Heaters"
But there is the issue of "comfort". My old Gran's 1 bar (1KW?) electric fire certainly didn't seem to "warm" the room as well a modern 1KW fan heater. Both used 1kw, both pushed out 1kw - but one warmed the rrom and the other the front of my body when sitting in front of iy.
So the question remains - to create a "warm" room what is better - a couple of oil filled rads or one of these ceramic/stone radiators? Or are both capable of creating a "warm room". Note, i use " " around warm. Why? well because when i have A/C on in summer and it's 35C outside I feel nice and "cool" in the bedroom yet the A/C thermostat is turned to 25C - a temperature i would find damn welcome right now in my lounge!
This is a genuine question, what type of heat delivers the best "warm and cosy" room? Or, as you imply, will they all do the same job if they're rated the same.
So the question remains - to create a "warm" room what is better - a couple of oil filled rads or one of these ceramic/stone radiators? Or are both capable of creating a "warm room". Note, i use " " around warm. Why? well because when i have A/C on in summer and it's 35C outside I feel nice and "cool" in the bedroom yet the A/C thermostat is turned to 25C - a temperature i would find damn welcome right now in my lounge!
This is a genuine question, what type of heat delivers the best "warm and cosy" room? Or, as you imply, will they all do the same job if they're rated the same.
#57
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: london/gandia
Posts: 1,163
Re: "Neater Heaters"
But there is the issue of "comfort". My old Gran's 1 bar (1KW?) electric fire certainly didn't seem to "warm" the room as well a modern 1KW fan heater. Both used 1kw, both pushed out 1kw - but one warmed the rrom and the other the front of my body when sitting in front of iy.
So the question remains - to create a "warm" room what is better - a couple of oil filled rads or one of these ceramic/stone radiators? Or are both capable of creating a "warm room". Note, i use " " around warm. Why? well because when i have A/C on in summer and it's 35C outside I feel nice and "cool" in the bedroom yet the A/C thermostat is turned to 25C - a temperature i would find damn welcome right now in my lounge!
This is a genuine question, what type of heat delivers the best "warm and cosy" room? Or, as you imply, will they all do the same job if they're rated the same.
So the question remains - to create a "warm" room what is better - a couple of oil filled rads or one of these ceramic/stone radiators? Or are both capable of creating a "warm room". Note, i use " " around warm. Why? well because when i have A/C on in summer and it's 35C outside I feel nice and "cool" in the bedroom yet the A/C thermostat is turned to 25C - a temperature i would find damn welcome right now in my lounge!
This is a genuine question, what type of heat delivers the best "warm and cosy" room? Or, as you imply, will they all do the same job if they're rated the same.
You might be found conked out from hypothermia the next morning but at least you will go looking cosy
Sorry, not the best answer but I sort of liked the idea
#58
Forum Regular
Joined: Aug 2014
Location: Fife, Scotland.
Posts: 130
Re: "Neater Heaters"
Perhaps a heater with a glowing coal effect front, would give the illusion that things are warmer than would otherwise be imagined. Add to this an ornamental dustpan, brush and poker? A couple of red candles flickering might add to the effect.
You might be found conked out from hypothermia the next morning but at least you will go looking cosy
Sorry, not the best answer but I sort of liked the idea
You might be found conked out from hypothermia the next morning but at least you will go looking cosy
Sorry, not the best answer but I sort of liked the idea
#59
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: london/gandia
Posts: 1,163
Re: "Neater Heaters"
It was your Gran's one bar fire that brought it all on
#60
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,148
Re: "Neater Heaters"
But there is the issue of "comfort". My old Gran's 1 bar (1KW?) electric fire certainly didn't seem to "warm" the room as well a modern 1KW fan heater. Both used 1kw, both pushed out 1kw - but one warmed the rrom and the other the front of my body when sitting in front of iy.
So the question remains - to create a "warm" room what is better - a couple of oil filled rads or one of these ceramic/stone radiators? Or are both capable of creating a "warm room". Note, i use " " around warm. Why? well because when i have A/C on in summer and it's 35C outside I feel nice and "cool" in the bedroom yet the A/C thermostat is turned to 25C - a temperature i would find damn welcome right now in my lounge!
This is a genuine question, what type of heat delivers the best "warm and cosy" room? Or, as you imply, will they all do the same job if they're rated the same.
So the question remains - to create a "warm" room what is better - a couple of oil filled rads or one of these ceramic/stone radiators? Or are both capable of creating a "warm room". Note, i use " " around warm. Why? well because when i have A/C on in summer and it's 35C outside I feel nice and "cool" in the bedroom yet the A/C thermostat is turned to 25C - a temperature i would find damn welcome right now in my lounge!
This is a genuine question, what type of heat delivers the best "warm and cosy" room? Or, as you imply, will they all do the same job if they're rated the same.