You know you've been in the US too long when...
#721

No. Wrong again. Congress didn't derail anything. Roosevelt had publicly been consistently isolationist, as was the American population, and congress was being consistent with both the president and the public. After the start of WW2, what little support Roosevelt was giving to the Brits was kept on the down-low because it would have been extremely unpopular. He was also quietly appointing interventionists in key governmental positions in preparation for what he felt would predictably occur. When Roosevelt finally did ask congress for a declaration of war (the "infamy" speech after the bombing of Pearl Harbor) it took congress only one hour to come back with their approval.
You miss the war he wanted to fight, Germany vs Japan. Little support to the UK during 1939-1941 is laughable, the entire Lend Lease Act favored the UK in the war. No similar option was available for Germany. So neutrality was not an issue.
Took one hour, yeah, because Japan attacked us. The US did not declare war on Germany, they did that to us. The US did not declare war on Germany until 11 Dec, again after they did to us.

Your last part is spot on, the reparations imposed were a contributing factor too, that led to the climate that allowed a Hitler to gain power in Germany.
I think a lot of this mentality stems from the original propaganda put out by the US government to garner public support for the war(s). It was very much sold to the people as a, "We're the only ones that can do this!", proposition. The problem is when that notion is still being taught and perpetuated as fact when the history is much richer and much more complex.
Also, I think there is a collective guilt-trip for all the horrors that happened while the US was dragging its feet. Therefore a tendency to revise and gloss over certain aspects, most certainly of WW2, in order to obsfucate the real life consequences of the USs isolationism.
My position is one of being honest without being apologetic. Acknowledge the contributions of everybody that fought (and won) the war but also try to make it understood that the US was war weary at that point in time. Also, we are viewing it through today's lense when, back then, there wasn't a "special relationship" yet and Americans weren't so quick to defend foreign interests or the interests of foreign nations.
Also, I think there is a collective guilt-trip for all the horrors that happened while the US was dragging its feet. Therefore a tendency to revise and gloss over certain aspects, most certainly of WW2, in order to obsfucate the real life consequences of the USs isolationism.
My position is one of being honest without being apologetic. Acknowledge the contributions of everybody that fought (and won) the war but also try to make it understood that the US was war weary at that point in time. Also, we are viewing it through today's lense when, back then, there wasn't a "special relationship" yet and Americans weren't so quick to defend foreign interests or the interests of foreign nations.
Your second point, I also disagree with, what about European collective guilt from 1933? Chamberlain etc... Europe allowed it to happen not the US? If you are talking about the Holocaust, reference German collective guilt since they too allowed it to happen and did nothing.
Your idea that everyone fought and should get a medal is well, the current politically correct thought we see in schools etc... Who was the arsenal of democracy? Who turned the tide? When was the "Allied" plan to reinvade the continent, without the US?
You are minimizing the tipping point of an entire nation at war, protected by oceans, provided an endless supply of tanks, aircraft and soldiers to fight nations that were already worn down.
Without Pearl Harbor, the US would not have entered the European conflict, IMHO. Unless, the Germans attacked the Western Hemisphere. Roosevelt knew this and created policies and rules of engagement to create tension with Nazi Germany in the Atlantic.
Oy Vey....

Also, FYI Iran under the Shah had a thriving Jewish community, maybe why so many saboteurs / agents are found in Iran today.
Last edited by SATX John; Feb 7th 2013 at 3:31 am.

#722

Hmmm isolationist President, while supporting the War in the Atlantic and encouraging US warships to attack submarines.
You miss the war he wanted to fight, Germany vs Japan. Little support to the UK during 1939-1941 is laughable, the entire Lend Lease Act favored the UK in the war. No similar option was available for Germany. So neutrality was not an issue.
Took one hour, yeah, because Japan attacked us. The US did not declare war on Germany, they did that to us. The US did not declare war on Germany until 11 Dec, again after they did to us.
That Brazilian division sure helped in Italy, and the Mexican fighter squadron, you are right
Your last part is spot on, the reparations imposed were a contributing factor too, that led to the climate that allowed a Hitler to gain power in Germany.
I disagree with several of your posts above. Your first one was the lobbying effort of certain anglophiles that said that, not all within the govt supported that message. Roosevelt actively supported the French and UK from 1939 on.
Your second point, I also disagree with, what about European collective guilt from 1933? Chamberlain etc... Europe allowed it to happen not the US? If you are talking about the Holocaust, reference German collective guilt since they too allowed it to happen and did nothing.
Your idea that everyone fought and should get a medal is well, the current politically correct thought we see in schools etc... Who was the arsenal of democracy? Who turned the tide? When was the "Allied" plan to reinvade the continent, without the US?
You are minimizing the tipping point of an entire nation at war, protected by oceans, provided an endless supply of tanks, aircraft and soldiers to fight nations that were already worn down.
Without Pearl Harbor, the US would not have entered the European conflict, IMHO. Unless, the Germans attacked the Western Hemisphere. Roosevelt knew this and created policies and rules of engagement to create tension with Nazi Germany in the Atlantic.
Oy Vey....
Also, FYI Iran under the Shah had a thriving Jewish community, maybe why so many saboteurs / agents are found in Iran today.
You miss the war he wanted to fight, Germany vs Japan. Little support to the UK during 1939-1941 is laughable, the entire Lend Lease Act favored the UK in the war. No similar option was available for Germany. So neutrality was not an issue.
Took one hour, yeah, because Japan attacked us. The US did not declare war on Germany, they did that to us. The US did not declare war on Germany until 11 Dec, again after they did to us.
That Brazilian division sure helped in Italy, and the Mexican fighter squadron, you are right

Your last part is spot on, the reparations imposed were a contributing factor too, that led to the climate that allowed a Hitler to gain power in Germany.
I disagree with several of your posts above. Your first one was the lobbying effort of certain anglophiles that said that, not all within the govt supported that message. Roosevelt actively supported the French and UK from 1939 on.
Your second point, I also disagree with, what about European collective guilt from 1933? Chamberlain etc... Europe allowed it to happen not the US? If you are talking about the Holocaust, reference German collective guilt since they too allowed it to happen and did nothing.
Your idea that everyone fought and should get a medal is well, the current politically correct thought we see in schools etc... Who was the arsenal of democracy? Who turned the tide? When was the "Allied" plan to reinvade the continent, without the US?
You are minimizing the tipping point of an entire nation at war, protected by oceans, provided an endless supply of tanks, aircraft and soldiers to fight nations that were already worn down.
Without Pearl Harbor, the US would not have entered the European conflict, IMHO. Unless, the Germans attacked the Western Hemisphere. Roosevelt knew this and created policies and rules of engagement to create tension with Nazi Germany in the Atlantic.
Oy Vey....

Also, FYI Iran under the Shah had a thriving Jewish community, maybe why so many saboteurs / agents are found in Iran today.
If any post sums you up, it is this. Looks like you did not read the posts, but assumed their content.
Perfect illustration of Sally's point that is for sure.

#723

.....you chat to a few of the competitors at the "World BBQ Championships" and are not really surprised that the furthest any of the teams had to travel was from Wisconsin.....

#724

Actually, I think your first sign was being at a "World BBQ Championship" to start off with.

#728


Also, and I'll shut up about it after this, in response to Sally's initial comments about the lack of American acknowledgement of the importance of Russia in WW2 ...
The Cold War started immediately after the end of WW2 and the government propaganda machine ran full tilt against Russia for generations after that. Having come of age in the 70s and 80s, I can tell you first hand that, saying (or teaching) anything remotely positive about Russia was considered subversive. Even as recently as the last presidential election, Mitt Romney was still banging the Red Scare drum. Old fears and hatreds die hard.

#729


To be fair, we were only "passing through" on the way to Seaworld....it was being held in their carpark on a "closed to the public" weekend. Apart from the 10's of 1000's of dollars in BBQ equipment, it looked more like a gypsy camp about to be raided by The Sweeney, rather than any sort of World Championship......

#731
BE Forum Addict









Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,759













Anyway, BBQ championships should include the challenges of lighting a soggy disposable BBQ with matches that fall to pieces when you try to strike them, with a pot of white spirit (used) to help light it, with frozen horsemeat burgers labelled as beef, in the pouring rain, howling wind, a bent fork for tongs, and a can of warm Stella for company. That's proper BBQing.

#732

[QUOTE=GeoffM;10530808]
for trying to bring it back on topic!
QUOTE]
I'm well guilty of rambling off topic on numerous other threads so thought it was time I took one for the team.....

QUOTE]
I'm well guilty of rambling off topic on numerous other threads so thought it was time I took one for the team.....


#733

..... Anyway, BBQ championships should include the challenges of lighting a soggy disposable BBQ with matches that fall to pieces when you try to strike them, with a pot of white spirit (used) to help light it, with frozen horsemeat burgers labelled as beef, in the pouring rain, howling wind, a bent fork for tongs, and a can of warm Stella for company. That's proper BBQing.

#735
Heading for Poppyland










Joined: Jul 2007
Location: North Norfolk and northern New York State
Posts: 14,151












One advantage of living in the frigid, rural north country; rhubarb grows everywhere, and once established, it grows forever. I cook with it all spring (crumbles mostly, but it is good in a vegetable curry, too.). My wife gets ten or twenty pounds of it each season and makes a big batch of wine. The degenerate locals around here seem to have forgotten that rhubarb is edible, so will let us take as much as we want from their patches..
