Wot I lurned on Fox today...
#31
Account Closed
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 8,266
Re: Wot I lurned on Fox today...
But that was before the London terror attack. Will things change now? Don't count on it. That's because media like the BBC won't stop at spin.
Coming from what is one of the most agenda-filled media outlets in the world?.. funny ha!ha!
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wot I lurned on Fox today...
Originally Posted by Manc
surely breaching the official secrets act is a felony?
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wot I lurned on Fox today...
Originally Posted by snorkmaiden
Can't wait to see what O'Reilly says about it. That press conference yesterday at the white house was just great.
It was almost too much excitement for me to cope with, and then the Democrats got in on it too with Kerry and Clinton suggesting Rove should be fired, his days must be numbered or the press just wouldn't get so brave.
Crooks and Liars has the video footage of both the press conference and Kerry calling for Rove to be fired.
You have to scroll a fair way down the page to find "Press Corp grilling Scotty" for the video link of the press conference, and the Kerry stuff is nearer the top.
Classic stuff.
It was almost too much excitement for me to cope with, and then the Democrats got in on it too with Kerry and Clinton suggesting Rove should be fired, his days must be numbered or the press just wouldn't get so brave.
Crooks and Liars has the video footage of both the press conference and Kerry calling for Rove to be fired.
You have to scroll a fair way down the page to find "Press Corp grilling Scotty" for the video link of the press conference, and the Kerry stuff is nearer the top.
Classic stuff.
#34
Re: Wot I lurned on Fox today...
Originally Posted by Franklin
Why should Rove be fired? Beyond the media hype, there is no crime here.
#35
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,577
Re: Wot I lurned on Fox today...
Originally Posted by Pigtails
I had to larf last week when they put up a big map of the Underground and tried to explain it to the viewers.
"So the red one goes over the green one, which then crosses the violet one. The explosions occured on the green one and the orange one."
#36
Mr. Grumpy
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,100
No No No
I'm at the airport just about to fly into london (and I will be staying 10 miles from Luton) and I come across this thread
I felt inclined to throw my laptop against the wall after reading the o'reilly commentary.
O'twat:
"We were being so severely criticized around the world because of the war in Vietnam, which is one of the reasons that it ended, because of world opinion"
This bloke is a complete cnut. End of story.
I felt inclined to throw my laptop against the wall after reading the o'reilly commentary.
O'twat:
"We were being so severely criticized around the world because of the war in Vietnam, which is one of the reasons that it ended, because of world opinion"
This bloke is a complete cnut. End of story.
#37
Re: Wot I lurned on Fox today...
Originally Posted by ImHere
Do they have one here? the OSA is a Brit thing. And it is punishble by imprisonment.
http://nationalreview.com/geraghty/g...0310010843.asp
Apparently he could receive a slap on the wrist, loss of security clearance, or possible prison. You don't think American policymakers would write laws that could get *them* thrown in the hoosegow, do you?
#38
Re: No No No
Originally Posted by BritGuyTN
O'twat:
"We were being so severely criticized around the world because of the war in Vietnam, which is one of the reasons that it ended, because of world opinion"
"We were being so severely criticized around the world because of the war in Vietnam, which is one of the reasons that it ended, because of world opinion"
Actually I think it ended cos Saigon fell and we had our butts handed to us. But then again I might be wrong. Odd that it took so long for world opinion to sink in.
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wot I lurned on Fox today...
Originally Posted by snowbunny
http://talkleft.com/new_archives/004859.html
http://nationalreview.com/geraghty/g...0310010843.asp
Apparently he could receive a slap on the wrist, loss of security clearance, or possible prison. You don't think American policymakers would write laws that could get *them* thrown in the hoosegow, do you?
http://nationalreview.com/geraghty/g...0310010843.asp
Apparently he could receive a slap on the wrist, loss of security clearance, or possible prison. You don't think American policymakers would write laws that could get *them* thrown in the hoosegow, do you?
Well I did wonder.
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wot I lurned on Fox today...
Originally Posted by elfman
regardless of whether or not a crime has been committed, Bush promised to fire anyone in his administration found to be involved with the leak.
#41
Re: Wot I lurned on Fox today...
Originally Posted by Franklin
Is Rove the source of the leak? Did Novak who wrote the story speak to Rove? Did Rove actually have knowledge of the identity of a covert CIA agent? If not, how could he be the source of the leak? There is no evidence that Rove knew the identify of a covert CIA agent and then leaked that information. Rove isn't even a suspect in the on-going Federal investigation of the leak. Media hype.
They may not have the goods on Rove to convict, but everyone in the movie states uncategorically that Rove will use any means necessary to humiliate and destroy anyone he considers his enemy. It may not have been him, but the glove certainly fits.
#42
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wot I lurned on Fox today...
Originally Posted by snowbunny
http://talkleft.com/new_archives/004859.html
http://nationalreview.com/geraghty/g...0310010843.asp
Apparently he could receive a slap on the wrist, loss of security clearance, or possible prison. You don't think American policymakers would write laws that could get *them* thrown in the hoosegow, do you?
http://nationalreview.com/geraghty/g...0310010843.asp
Apparently he could receive a slap on the wrist, loss of security clearance, or possible prison. You don't think American policymakers would write laws that could get *them* thrown in the hoosegow, do you?
#43
Mr. Grumpy
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,100
Re: No No No
Originally Posted by snowbunny
Actually I think it ended cos Saigon fell and we had our butts handed to us. But then again I might be wrong. Odd that it took so long for world opinion to sink in.
Thats what I thought, although defeat is apparently extremely subjective.
maybe Hitler actually lost the war because of world opinion.
I just get more annoyed every day with o'reilly. If I get an aneurism I may well file a suit against Fox
#44
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wot I lurned on Fox today...
Originally Posted by snowbunny
Franklin, out of curiosity, have you watched Bush's Brain?
They may not have the goods on Rove to convict, but everyone in the movie states uncategorically that Rove will use any means necessary to humiliate and destroy anyone he considers his enemy. It may not have been him, but the glove certainly fits.
They may not have the goods on Rove to convict, but everyone in the movie states uncategorically that Rove will use any means necessary to humiliate and destroy anyone he considers his enemy. It may not have been him, but the glove certainly fits.
#45
Re: Wot I lurned on Fox today...
How about:
The guy's a dangerous asshole who we did NOT elect and who is the source of much grief even if he didn't do this job. The fact that Bush feels he needs such a cut-throat viper as his advisor speaks volumes.
*Must* Bush fire him? Don't know yet. *Should* he fire him? That much is obvious.
The guy's a dangerous asshole who we did NOT elect and who is the source of much grief even if he didn't do this job. The fact that Bush feels he needs such a cut-throat viper as his advisor speaks volumes.
*Must* Bush fire him? Don't know yet. *Should* he fire him? That much is obvious.