Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > USA
Reload this Page >

US: Immigrants May Be Held Indefinitely

Wikiposts

US: Immigrants May Be Held Indefinitely

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 14th 2006, 9:03 am
  #91  
Septicity
 
fatbrit's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 23,762
fatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: US: Immigrants May Be Held Indefinitely

Originally Posted by anotherlimey
Nope, but there is the 14th Amendment:

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The "any person" here - I believe - is generally regarded as anyone in the US. So it does afford some protection for non-USCs.
We had a bucket load of crap propositions for the closet racist crowd at the recent election. They all passed. This one was probably the worst:

Proposition 102 states that:
A PERSON WHO IS PRESENT IN THIS STATE IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW RELATED TO IMPROPER ENTRY BY AN ALIEN SHALL NOT BE AWARDED PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN ANY ACTION IN ANY COURT IN THIS STATE.

Be interesting to see what happens to this when it reaches the higher courts -- as it undoubtedly will!
fatbrit is offline  
Old Nov 14th 2006, 9:06 am
  #92  
Homebody
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: HOME
Posts: 23,182
Elvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: US: Immigrants May Be Held Indefinitely

Originally Posted by fatbrit
We had a bucket load of crap propositions for the closet racist crowd at the recent election. They all passed. This one was probably the worst:

Proposition 102 states that:
A PERSON WHO IS PRESENT IN THIS STATE IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW RELATED TO IMPROPER ENTRY BY AN ALIEN SHALL NOT BE AWARDED PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN ANY ACTION IN ANY COURT IN THIS STATE.

Be interesting to see what happens to this when it reaches the higher courts -- as it undoubtedly will!

So employers can now exploit illegal workers with even more impunity than previously.
Elvira is offline  
Old Nov 14th 2006, 9:12 am
  #93  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,578
anotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: US: Immigrants May Be Held Indefinitely

Originally Posted by fatbrit
We had a bucket load of crap propositions for the closet racist crowd at the recent election. They all passed. This one was probably the worst:

Proposition 102 states that:
A PERSON WHO IS PRESENT IN THIS STATE IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW RELATED TO IMPROPER ENTRY BY AN ALIEN SHALL NOT BE AWARDED PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN ANY ACTION IN ANY COURT IN THIS STATE.

Be interesting to see what happens to this when it reaches the higher courts -- as it undoubtedly will!
Do they need a test case to be taken to a higher court? If so, I doubt there's an illegal immigrant who would submit themselves to this.
anotherlimey is offline  
Old Nov 14th 2006, 9:13 am
  #94  
Septicity
 
fatbrit's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 23,762
fatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: US: Immigrants May Be Held Indefinitely

Originally Posted by Elvira
So employers can now exploit illegal workers with even more impunity than previously.

Yep --

First of all, export all jobs possible to cheaper markets overseas without worker protection.

Secondly, import cheap labour for those jobs that cannot be exported.

Welcome to the United Corporations of America, folks!
fatbrit is offline  
Old Nov 14th 2006, 9:15 am
  #95  
Thinking about it
 
BigDavyG's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Mid-West
Posts: 9,435
BigDavyG has a reputation beyond reputeBigDavyG has a reputation beyond reputeBigDavyG has a reputation beyond reputeBigDavyG has a reputation beyond reputeBigDavyG has a reputation beyond reputeBigDavyG has a reputation beyond reputeBigDavyG has a reputation beyond reputeBigDavyG has a reputation beyond reputeBigDavyG has a reputation beyond reputeBigDavyG has a reputation beyond reputeBigDavyG has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: US: Immigrants May Be Held Indefinitely

Originally Posted by gardnma
Like the Japanese and Germans were in WW2? The stance of the right seems to be that we are at war and therefore they can justify (and have done) just about anything they feel like. Thats the scary sh!t right there, IMO. All they have to do is wave the "Bloody Shirt" and anything goes. Trouble is, if anything goes, eventually, everything may.

Personally, I am afraid for my children, but that's another thread, innit?
Can you qualify that statement with 'extreme right' perhaps - its a bit of a massive overstatement to say that this behaviour is some kind of right-wing trait.
Anyway, didn't the Russians get up to some fairly nasty stuff during WW2 as well, or does that not count ??
BigDavyG is offline  
Old Nov 14th 2006, 9:18 am
  #96  
Septicity
 
fatbrit's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 23,762
fatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: US: Immigrants May Be Held Indefinitely

Originally Posted by anotherlimey
Do they need a test case to be taken to a higher court? If so, I doubt there's an illegal immigrant who would submit themselves to this.
The only way I know to appeal is to first lose. I'm pretty sure that "radical organizations that free paedophiles" such as the ACLU will be footing the bill for you.
fatbrit is offline  
Old Nov 14th 2006, 9:18 am
  #97  
Lapine Member
 
snowbunny's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: Austin, Texas in my own little world
Posts: 21,691
snowbunny has a reputation beyond reputesnowbunny has a reputation beyond reputesnowbunny has a reputation beyond reputesnowbunny has a reputation beyond reputesnowbunny has a reputation beyond reputesnowbunny has a reputation beyond reputesnowbunny has a reputation beyond reputesnowbunny has a reputation beyond reputesnowbunny has a reputation beyond reputesnowbunny has a reputation beyond reputesnowbunny has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: US: Immigrants May Be Held Indefinitely

Originally Posted by dan_alford
Section 3: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
Well I haven't waged war or given aid and comfort to anyone who I know to be an Enemy. Well, wait a minute.... does volunteering to give food to people who are most likely illegal aliens count? Should I ask to see their papers first?
snowbunny is offline  
Old Nov 14th 2006, 9:21 am
  #98  
Slight chance of Showers
 
dan_alford's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: Norfolk,UK ->Memphis,TN
Posts: 1,158
dan_alford has a reputation beyond reputedan_alford has a reputation beyond reputedan_alford has a reputation beyond reputedan_alford has a reputation beyond reputedan_alford has a reputation beyond reputedan_alford has a reputation beyond reputedan_alford has a reputation beyond reputedan_alford has a reputation beyond reputedan_alford has a reputation beyond reputedan_alford has a reputation beyond reputedan_alford has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: US: Immigrants May Be Held Indefinitely

Originally Posted by snowbunny
Well I haven't waged war or given aid and comfort to anyone who I know to be an Enemy. Well, wait a minute.... does volunteering to give food to people who are most likely illegal aliens count? Should I ask to see their papers first?
I'm sure that many of the radical republicans and christian extremists will say that by not supporting the government you are giving aid to the enemy
dan_alford is offline  
Old Nov 14th 2006, 9:29 am
  #99  
Bugger Off!
 
Silly Sod's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,858
Silly Sod has a reputation beyond reputeSilly Sod has a reputation beyond reputeSilly Sod has a reputation beyond reputeSilly Sod has a reputation beyond reputeSilly Sod has a reputation beyond reputeSilly Sod has a reputation beyond reputeSilly Sod has a reputation beyond reputeSilly Sod has a reputation beyond reputeSilly Sod has a reputation beyond reputeSilly Sod has a reputation beyond reputeSilly Sod has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: US: Immigrants May Be Held Indefinitely

Originally Posted by BigDavyG
Can you qualify that statement with 'extreme right' perhaps - its a bit of a massive overstatement to say that this behaviour is some kind of right-wing trait.
Anyway, didn't the Russians get up to some fairly nasty stuff during WW2 as well, or does that not count ??
Does the current administration consider itself the extreme right?
Silly Sod is offline  
Old Nov 14th 2006, 9:32 am
  #100  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 360
jen_andreson has a reputation beyond reputejen_andreson has a reputation beyond reputejen_andreson has a reputation beyond reputejen_andreson has a reputation beyond reputejen_andreson has a reputation beyond reputejen_andreson has a reputation beyond reputejen_andreson has a reputation beyond reputejen_andreson has a reputation beyond reputejen_andreson has a reputation beyond reputejen_andreson has a reputation beyond reputejen_andreson has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: US: Immigrants May Be Held Indefinitely

Just to clarify, as I read about this (links below) it only applies to those who have been classified as combatants. It is not saying that any immigrant can be held indefinitely.

Is that incorrect?

I'm not saying that I agree with it, but just trying to be clear on what it really means.

I guess we need to understand how combatant is defined, and watch what happens with the court proceedings on this.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlates...213509,00.html

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/wa..._indefinitely/

Last edited by jen_andreson; Nov 14th 2006 at 9:34 am.
jen_andreson is offline  
Old Nov 14th 2006, 9:43 am
  #101  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 360
jen_andreson has a reputation beyond reputejen_andreson has a reputation beyond reputejen_andreson has a reputation beyond reputejen_andreson has a reputation beyond reputejen_andreson has a reputation beyond reputejen_andreson has a reputation beyond reputejen_andreson has a reputation beyond reputejen_andreson has a reputation beyond reputejen_andreson has a reputation beyond reputejen_andreson has a reputation beyond reputejen_andreson has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: US: Immigrants May Be Held Indefinitely

Originally Posted by fatbrit
We had a bucket load of crap propositions for the closet racist crowd at the recent election. They all passed. This one was probably the worst:

Proposition 102 states that:
A PERSON WHO IS PRESENT IN THIS STATE IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW RELATED TO IMPROPER ENTRY BY AN ALIEN SHALL NOT BE AWARDED PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN ANY ACTION IN ANY COURT IN THIS STATE.

Be interesting to see what happens to this when it reaches the higher courts -- as it undoubtedly will!
How many illegal aliens sue for/expect punitive damages? I would have thought illegals would keep a low profile, rather than take someone to court?

This still entitled illegals to compensatory damages, if you read the whole proposition:

A person who wins a civil lawsuit may receive two types of damages-compensatory and punitive. Compensatory damages are awarded to compensate the injured party for the injuries sustained by making good or replacing the loss caused by the injury. Punitive damages are awarded in excess of compensatory damages to punish the person sued for a serious wrong and to discourage others from engaging in similar wrongful conduct.
Proposition 102 would prohibit a person who wins a civil lawsuit from receiving punitive damages if the person is present in this state in violation of federal immigration law related to improper entry.


--not sure why that is so bad? Should illegal aliens be allowed to sue and receive punitive and compensatory damages?

Last edited by jen_andreson; Nov 14th 2006 at 9:46 am.
jen_andreson is offline  
Old Nov 14th 2006, 9:43 am
  #102  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,196
gardnma will become famous soon enough
Default Re: US: Immigrants May Be Held Indefinitely

Originally Posted by BigDavyG
Can you qualify that statement with 'extreme right' perhaps - its a bit of a massive overstatement to say that this behaviour is some kind of right-wing trait.
Anyway, didn't the Russians get up to some fairly nasty stuff during WW2 as well, or does that not count ??
Weeel, oh allright then. Extreme right it is. There must be some right wingers who won't have hot botties for eternity.
I suppose.

Absolutely right there about the Reds. They were as much an evil as Nazi Germany - and they got away with it.
The "removal" of the Kulaks for example.
They didn't release many German POW's until the mid to late 1950's as you may well know.
gardnma is offline  
Old Nov 14th 2006, 9:48 am
  #103  
Thinking about it
 
BigDavyG's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Mid-West
Posts: 9,435
BigDavyG has a reputation beyond reputeBigDavyG has a reputation beyond reputeBigDavyG has a reputation beyond reputeBigDavyG has a reputation beyond reputeBigDavyG has a reputation beyond reputeBigDavyG has a reputation beyond reputeBigDavyG has a reputation beyond reputeBigDavyG has a reputation beyond reputeBigDavyG has a reputation beyond reputeBigDavyG has a reputation beyond reputeBigDavyG has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: US: Immigrants May Be Held Indefinitely

Originally Posted by Silly Sod
Does the current administration consider itself the extreme right?
The current administration can consider itself to be the fairy on top of the Christmas Tree to be fair - that doesn't make it true though.
BigDavyG is offline  
Old Nov 14th 2006, 9:59 am
  #104  
Bugger Off!
 
Silly Sod's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,858
Silly Sod has a reputation beyond reputeSilly Sod has a reputation beyond reputeSilly Sod has a reputation beyond reputeSilly Sod has a reputation beyond reputeSilly Sod has a reputation beyond reputeSilly Sod has a reputation beyond reputeSilly Sod has a reputation beyond reputeSilly Sod has a reputation beyond reputeSilly Sod has a reputation beyond reputeSilly Sod has a reputation beyond reputeSilly Sod has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: US: Immigrants May Be Held Indefinitely

Originally Posted by BigDavyG
The current administration can consider itself to be the fairy on top of the Christmas Tree to be fair - that doesn't make it true though.
I meant that the current administration doesn't consider itself the extreme right and yet they obviously are and behaving that way. So I didn't think there was any need to qualify the original statement with 'extreme right'. As far as the current administration would have us believe they are all god fearing Christians doing good works to save the world (albeit by any means necessary).
Silly Sod is offline  
Old Nov 14th 2006, 10:14 am
  #105  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 387
gsnichol has a reputation beyond reputegsnichol has a reputation beyond reputegsnichol has a reputation beyond reputegsnichol has a reputation beyond reputegsnichol has a reputation beyond reputegsnichol has a reputation beyond reputegsnichol has a reputation beyond reputegsnichol has a reputation beyond reputegsnichol has a reputation beyond reputegsnichol has a reputation beyond reputegsnichol has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: US: Immigrants May Be Held Indefinitely

Originally Posted by fatbrit
We had a bucket load of crap propositions for the closet racist crowd at the recent election. They all passed. This one was probably the worst:

Proposition 102 states that:
A PERSON WHO IS PRESENT IN THIS STATE IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW RELATED TO IMPROPER ENTRY BY AN ALIEN SHALL NOT BE AWARDED PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN ANY ACTION IN ANY COURT IN THIS STATE.

Be interesting to see what happens to this when it reaches the higher courts -- as it undoubtedly will!

I didn't realise that was on the ballot. From the media hype you would think it was all about lotteries, marriage and cigarette smoking.
gsnichol is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.