Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > USA
Reload this Page >

Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.

Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 12th 2007, 7:51 pm
  #31  
Septicity
 
fatbrit's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 23,762
fatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.

Originally Posted by Boiler
I think you are adding 0's, Fatbrit said 250.
Fatbrit likes ellipsis!
fatbrit is offline  
Old Dec 12th 2007, 8:01 pm
  #32  
Not here much
 
neil's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Highland Park, NJ
Posts: 2,452
neil has a reputation beyond reputeneil has a reputation beyond reputeneil has a reputation beyond reputeneil has a reputation beyond reputeneil has a reputation beyond reputeneil has a reputation beyond reputeneil has a reputation beyond reputeneil has a reputation beyond reputeneil has a reputation beyond reputeneil has a reputation beyond reputeneil has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.

Originally Posted by Michaelmike5556
Marriot Yellowstone there is one of those already . i am not defeatist i dont trust the goverment with my health care . With Rights come responbiltys if the goverment is in charge of my health then that gives them reason to tell me what to eat Drink Smoke etc etc ... it would be like moving back in with my mom and dad . if you dont pay your way the one in charge of doing that for u will .
You do realise that there will come a time when insurance companies will take into account your smoking/drinking history when deciding what they will pay for when you become sick? When they get to a point when it is possible for them to monitor your lifestyle easily this would be a logical step for them.
neil is offline  
Old Dec 12th 2007, 8:06 pm
  #33  
Riding on silver wings
 
ugacrew's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 10,543
ugacrew has a reputation beyond reputeugacrew has a reputation beyond reputeugacrew has a reputation beyond reputeugacrew has a reputation beyond reputeugacrew has a reputation beyond reputeugacrew has a reputation beyond reputeugacrew has a reputation beyond reputeugacrew has a reputation beyond reputeugacrew has a reputation beyond reputeugacrew has a reputation beyond reputeugacrew has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.

Originally Posted by neil
You do realise that there will come a time when insurance companies will take into account your smoking/drinking history when deciding what they will pay for when you become sick? When they get to a point when it is possible for them to monitor your lifestyle easily this would be a logical step for them.
Some deny coverage all together due to pre-existing conditions.
ugacrew is offline  
Old Dec 12th 2007, 11:21 pm
  #34  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: NW Chicago suburbs
Posts: 11,253
Tracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.

Originally Posted by lapin_windstar
I don't know why there is such fear of "socialized" medicine. We (US) pay way more and get way less per dollar than practically anyone else.

What's the VA's spend per covered individual? And is it that much worse than private insurance or (even more so) than being uninsured? I suppose they don't do a lot of obgyn, ER work etc.

Well said, you commie!
The fear is not of the cost.

The fear is of rationing, and/or loss of quality.
Tracym is offline  
Old Dec 12th 2007, 11:51 pm
  #35  
BE Enthusiast
 
simongb's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: Baltimore, USA
Posts: 526
simongb has a reputation beyond reputesimongb has a reputation beyond reputesimongb has a reputation beyond reputesimongb has a reputation beyond reputesimongb has a reputation beyond reputesimongb has a reputation beyond reputesimongb has a reputation beyond reputesimongb has a reputation beyond reputesimongb has a reputation beyond reputesimongb has a reputation beyond reputesimongb has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.

Originally Posted by BritGuyTN
so basically the only person who wants universal health care is Kucinich

since this is my most important subject and no-one who can be realistically elected is in favour of it i am going the selfish route

i hate rudy giuliani on a personal level, but since he is not likely to rape me on taxes and is pro-choice, in favour of gay marriage I think i would have to support him

i can't beleive I just typed that
BritguyTN, I agree with you. Gay marriage is a civil right. In a country that supposedly prides itself on equality and justice for all, apparently gay people do not count. Bush and the rest of his fascist junta have used gay rights as a divisive issue for their own political gains. The fact is that the majority of US voters are sheep that have knee jerk reactions to 'hot button issues' rather than thinking them through to a logical conclusion. Most civilised countries in the world have gay civil unions of some sort and that the US does not says a lot about civil rights in this country. Unless you are straight, white and republican there are not many 'civil rights' for you!
simongb is offline  
Old Dec 12th 2007, 11:56 pm
  #36  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: NW Chicago suburbs
Posts: 11,253
Tracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.

Originally Posted by simongb
BritguyTN, I agree with you. Gay marriage is a civil right. In a country that supposedly prides itself on equality and justice for all, apparently gay people do not count. Bush and the rest of his fascist junta have used gay rights as a divisive issue for their own political gains. The fact is that the majority of US voters are sheep that have knee jerk reactions to 'hot button issues' rather than thinking them through to a logical conclusion. Most civilised countries in the world have gay civil unions of some sort and that the US does not says a lot about civil rights in this country. Unless you are straight, white and republican there are not many 'civil rights' for you!
We're idiots in that area.

If two grown-ups want to civilly commit to each other, that's their business.
Tracym is offline  
Old Dec 13th 2007, 12:47 am
  #37  
Mr. Grumpy
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,100
BritGuyTN has a reputation beyond reputeBritGuyTN has a reputation beyond reputeBritGuyTN has a reputation beyond reputeBritGuyTN has a reputation beyond reputeBritGuyTN has a reputation beyond reputeBritGuyTN has a reputation beyond reputeBritGuyTN has a reputation beyond reputeBritGuyTN has a reputation beyond reputeBritGuyTN has a reputation beyond reputeBritGuyTN has a reputation beyond reputeBritGuyTN has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.

Originally Posted by Tracym
We're christian fundamentalists in that area.

If two grown-ups want to civilly commit to each other, that's their business.
edited for accuracy
BritGuyTN is offline  
Old Dec 13th 2007, 1:29 am
  #38  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 317
marriedtothemod has a reputation beyond reputemarriedtothemod has a reputation beyond reputemarriedtothemod has a reputation beyond reputemarriedtothemod has a reputation beyond reputemarriedtothemod has a reputation beyond reputemarriedtothemod has a reputation beyond reputemarriedtothemod has a reputation beyond reputemarriedtothemod has a reputation beyond reputemarriedtothemod has a reputation beyond reputemarriedtothemod has a reputation beyond reputemarriedtothemod has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.

Originally Posted by Tracym
The fear is not of the cost.

The fear is of rationing, and/or loss of quality.
a bit like the current system then?
marriedtothemod is offline  
Old Dec 13th 2007, 2:48 am
  #39  
Homebody
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: HOME
Posts: 23,179
Elvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.

Originally Posted by marriedtothemod
a bit like the current system then?
LOL.......... you took the words out of my mouth...
Elvira is offline  
Old Dec 13th 2007, 4:51 am
  #40  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Steerpike's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 13,103
Steerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.

Originally Posted by ugacrew
Some deny coverage all together due to pre-existing conditions.
Absolutely correct.

I do hope the poster who said "if the goverment is in charge of my health then that gives them reason to tell me what to eat Drink Smoke etc etc ... it would be like moving back in with my mom and dad " realises that this is exactly the case today with the private insurance companies.

As long as you are eligible for group insurance, they cannot deny you coverage. But the minute you apply for insurance as an individual, they require you to disclose your past history, both of medical problems, and 'lifestyle'. There are well documented cases of people being denied coverage due to a past history of smoking. Think you can lie? When they finally open you up and see the scar tissue in your lungs, they will take steps to invalidate your insurance claiming you lied on your application. This is NOT a good country to smoke in!

I would personaly welcome insurance that gave penalties for bad lifestyles, benefits for good lifestyles. Smoke, bungee-jump - pay more! However - I think it is wrong beyond words that they can deny you coverage for pre-existing conditions, conditions you had no control over. A close friend recently went through the whole breast cancer thing; she came through it well, thank goodness, and was incredibly well looked after - consultations, options, 2nd, 3rd opinions, etc - but if she were to lose her job and have to get private insurance as an individual, she could definitely be turned down, which is inhuman and barbaric.

Last edited by Steerpike; Dec 13th 2007 at 5:31 am.
Steerpike is offline  
Old Dec 13th 2007, 9:24 am
  #41  
gurt mint nit?
Thread Starter
 
Xebedee's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: In my shed
Posts: 2,776
Xebedee has a reputation beyond reputeXebedee has a reputation beyond reputeXebedee has a reputation beyond reputeXebedee has a reputation beyond reputeXebedee has a reputation beyond reputeXebedee has a reputation beyond reputeXebedee has a reputation beyond reputeXebedee has a reputation beyond reputeXebedee has a reputation beyond reputeXebedee has a reputation beyond reputeXebedee has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.

Originally Posted by Tracym
The fear is not of the cost.
The fear is of rationing, and/or loss of quality.
Yes. There is also the fear of universal (socialised) healthcare because the average American simply does not understand it. Then there is the strange concept that there is a loss in personal freedom because the fed govt. has taken over that part of peoples' lives.
Xebedee is offline  
Old Dec 13th 2007, 10:41 am
  #42  
BE Enthusiast
 
simongb's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: Baltimore, USA
Posts: 526
simongb has a reputation beyond reputesimongb has a reputation beyond reputesimongb has a reputation beyond reputesimongb has a reputation beyond reputesimongb has a reputation beyond reputesimongb has a reputation beyond reputesimongb has a reputation beyond reputesimongb has a reputation beyond reputesimongb has a reputation beyond reputesimongb has a reputation beyond reputesimongb has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.

It is absolutely insane that the US does not have some kind of universal health care. When politicians call it 'socialised' medicine it makes my blood boil. So, we have 'socialised' education then? How about our 'socialised' police force? Again, we have a knee jerk reaction from the electorate and they vote against anyone supporting national health. As if healthcare for all will lead to the destruction of the nation? The other argument I hear is, 'we have 20 MRI machines in Baltimore alone and they only have 20 in the whole of Canada!'. Ok, what's the point in having all those machines when not everyone gets to use them??? Sometimes (more than not lately) I feel like I am going insane here and then I come on the forum and you guys remind me thet I am normal! British! Thanks!
simongb is offline  
Old Dec 13th 2007, 12:40 pm
  #43  
Not here much
 
neil's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Highland Park, NJ
Posts: 2,452
neil has a reputation beyond reputeneil has a reputation beyond reputeneil has a reputation beyond reputeneil has a reputation beyond reputeneil has a reputation beyond reputeneil has a reputation beyond reputeneil has a reputation beyond reputeneil has a reputation beyond reputeneil has a reputation beyond reputeneil has a reputation beyond reputeneil has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.

Originally Posted by Xebedee
Yes. There is also the fear of universal (socialised) healthcare because the average American simply does not understand it. Then there is the strange concept that there is a loss in personal freedom because the fed govt. has taken over that part of peoples' lives.
I think we should privatise the police - everyone has to pay insurance and when you need the police for whatever reason you have to get pre-approval from your insurance company. Then we should do the same for the fire service.
neil is offline  
Old Dec 13th 2007, 2:10 pm
  #44  
And YOU'RE paying for it!
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: kipper tie?
Posts: 2,328
lapin_windstar has a reputation beyond reputelapin_windstar has a reputation beyond reputelapin_windstar has a reputation beyond reputelapin_windstar has a reputation beyond reputelapin_windstar has a reputation beyond reputelapin_windstar has a reputation beyond reputelapin_windstar has a reputation beyond reputelapin_windstar has a reputation beyond reputelapin_windstar has a reputation beyond reputelapin_windstar has a reputation beyond reputelapin_windstar has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.

Originally Posted by neil
I think we should privatise the police - everyone has to pay insurance and when you need the police for whatever reason you have to get pre-approval from your insurance company. Then we should do the same for the fire service.
Isn't that how it used to be in many places in the US and that's why they're called Springfield Fire Co?
lapin_windstar is offline  
Old Dec 13th 2007, 2:12 pm
  #45  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: NW Chicago suburbs
Posts: 11,253
Tracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.

Originally Posted by lapin_windstar
Isn't that how it used to be in many places in the US and that's why they're called Springfield Fire Co?
In many cases, the fire department is volunteer.
Tracym is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.