Selling a house without a realtor
We are due to sign with a realtor tomorrow afternoon...but after selling the car within 1 hour of putting it for sale by the road...it's got me wondering if we should try to sell the house ourselves. Has anyone tried to do this...does anyone know what is involved...is it worth it or false economy?
|
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 10754004)
We are due to sign with a realtor tomorrow afternoon...but after selling the car within 1 hour of putting it for sale by the road...it's got me wondering if we should try to sell the house ourselves. Has anyone tried to do this...does anyone know what is involved...is it worth it or false economy?
If you then only do a private sale (no realtor), the buyer then expects that he will get his share of your savings since generally closing is more complicated since neither party fully understands what to do and they don't trust each other. Therefore unless there is some advantage of purchasing a home from a private seller, most stay away from that. Also with few potential buyers, you probably won't get the price that you would get using a realtor where there may be multiple buyers bidding for the property. |
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
Land of the Free.
It would be very tempting but the realtors would be against you as Michael says. PS are you leaving the US for good? |
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
Originally Posted by Michael
(Post 10754025)
It can be done by yourself for between about $200-$4,000 depending on the package you take (MLS listing only to MLS listing, signs, assistance for documentation from a web site, etc.) but realtors won't show your house unless the MLS indicates at least 2.50% commission for them. Even then realtors don't like showing a home from a private seller since there can be complications.
If you then only do a private sale (no realtor), the buyer then expects that he will get his share of your savings since generally closing is more complicated since neither party fully understands what to do and they don't trust each other. Therefore unless there is some advantage of purchasing a home from a private seller, most stay away from that. Also with few potential buyers, you probably won't get the price that you would get using a realtor where there may be multiple buyers bidding for the property. The disadvantage is that |
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 10754049)
Land of the Free.
It would be very tempting but the realtors would be against you as Michael says. PS are you leaving the US for good? When we lived in the UK we always sold our own houses. Goes against the grain to lose 6% of the profits. |
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 10754062)
Yeah they have pretty much got the housing market wrapped up for themselves haven't they? :frown:
When we lived in the UK we always sold our own houses. Goes against the grain to lose 6% of the profits. |
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 10754072)
I don't think what they do is worth anything like 6% of a high-value house.
|
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 10754077)
Neither do I. I watch Million Dollar Listings...I know how quickly they turn over property. Ka Ching. ;)
|
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 10754078)
Good return on a few plates of nibbles :lol:
|
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 10754056)
That's what I thought Michael...thank you for the confirmation. Shame though...6% is a big chunk of change. ;)
Also there are discount brokerages such as ZipReality that charge as little as 4.5% and can possibly be as good as the large firms. http://www.ziprealty.com/ |
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
Originally Posted by Michael
(Post 10754090)
You can generally get a lower commission by giving exclusive listing (both buying and selling) to specific real estate brokerage (ex. Coldwell Banker) but again the number of potential buyers is likely reduced.
Also there are discount brokerages such as ZipReality that charge as little as 4.5% and can possibly be as good as the large firms. http://www.ziprealty.com/ |
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 10754098)
The realtor said although it wasn't ethical...some realtors aren't interested unless they get the full 3% cut.
In fact when I sold my last home, the buyer used ZipReality (I don't know why unless the buyer gets a kickback). Also sometimes even an real estate agent from a large firm may only indicate (without your knowledge) a buyer's commission of less than 3%. |
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
If the market is slow where you are, then you can negotiate the commission fairly easily. If things are busy, then it could be more difficult. It's not unethical to haggle over the fee.
That being said, you'll probably find it easier just to hire an agent. They can list property on the MLS, while you can't. |
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
Ziprealty could be worth a look.
|
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
(Post 10754115)
If the market is slow where you are, then you can negotiate the commission fairly easily. If things are busy, then it could be more difficult. It's not unethical to haggle over the fee.
That being said, you'll probably find it easier just to hire an agent. They can list property on the MLS, while you can't. http://www.flatfeegroup.com/?gclid=C...FQdyQgodiS4AaQ http://www.flatfeegroup.com/NewJersey/ |
All times are GMT. The time now is 6:35 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.