Selling a house without a realtor
#1
Selling a house without a realtor
We are due to sign with a realtor tomorrow afternoon...but after selling the car within 1 hour of putting it for sale by the road...it's got me wondering if we should try to sell the house ourselves. Has anyone tried to do this...does anyone know what is involved...is it worth it or false economy?
#2
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
We are due to sign with a realtor tomorrow afternoon...but after selling the car within 1 hour of putting it for sale by the road...it's got me wondering if we should try to sell the house ourselves. Has anyone tried to do this...does anyone know what is involved...is it worth it or false economy?
If you then only do a private sale (no realtor), the buyer then expects that he will get his share of your savings since generally closing is more complicated since neither party fully understands what to do and they don't trust each other. Therefore unless there is some advantage of purchasing a home from a private seller, most stay away from that.
Also with few potential buyers, you probably won't get the price that you would get using a realtor where there may be multiple buyers bidding for the property.
Last edited by Michael; Jun 12th 2013 at 10:22 pm.
#3
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 41,518
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
Land of the Free.
It would be very tempting but the realtors would be against you as Michael says.
PS are you leaving the US for good?
It would be very tempting but the realtors would be against you as Michael says.
PS are you leaving the US for good?
Last edited by Sally Redux; Jun 12th 2013 at 10:17 pm.
#4
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
It can be done by yourself for between about $200-$4,000 depending on the package you take (MLS listing only to MLS listing, signs, assistance for documentation from a web site, etc.) but realtors won't show your house unless the MLS indicates at least 2.50% commission for them. Even then realtors don't like showing a home from a private seller since there can be complications.
If you then only do a private sale (no realtor), the buyer then expects that he will get his share of your savings since generally closing is more complicated since neither party fully understands what to do and they don't trust each other. Therefore unless there is some advantage of purchasing a home from a private seller, most stay away from that.
Also with few potential buyers, you probably won't get the price that you would get using a realtor where there may be multiple buyers bidding for the property.
The disadvantage is that
If you then only do a private sale (no realtor), the buyer then expects that he will get his share of your savings since generally closing is more complicated since neither party fully understands what to do and they don't trust each other. Therefore unless there is some advantage of purchasing a home from a private seller, most stay away from that.
Also with few potential buyers, you probably won't get the price that you would get using a realtor where there may be multiple buyers bidding for the property.
The disadvantage is that
#5
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
When we lived in the UK we always sold our own houses. Goes against the grain to lose 6% of the profits.
#6
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 41,518
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
I don't think what they do is worth anything like 6% of a high-value house.
#10
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
Also there are discount brokerages such as ZipReality that charge as little as 4.5% and can possibly be as good as the large firms.
http://www.ziprealty.com/
#11
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
You can generally get a lower commission by giving exclusive listing (both buying and selling) to specific real estate brokerage (ex. Coldwell Banker) but again the number of potential buyers is likely reduced.
Also there are discount brokerages such as ZipReality that charge as little as 4.5% and can possibly be as good as the large firms.
http://www.ziprealty.com/
Also there are discount brokerages such as ZipReality that charge as little as 4.5% and can possibly be as good as the large firms.
http://www.ziprealty.com/
#12
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
In fact when I sold my last home, the buyer used ZipReality (I don't know why unless the buyer gets a kickback).
Also sometimes even an real estate agent from a large firm may only indicate (without your knowledge) a buyer's commission of less than 3%.
#13
Bloody Yank
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: USA! USA!
Posts: 4,186
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
If the market is slow where you are, then you can negotiate the commission fairly easily. If things are busy, then it could be more difficult. It's not unethical to haggle over the fee.
That being said, you'll probably find it easier just to hire an agent. They can list property on the MLS, while you can't.
That being said, you'll probably find it easier just to hire an agent. They can list property on the MLS, while you can't.
#14
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 41,518
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
Ziprealty could be worth a look.
#15
Re: Selling a house without a realtor
If the market is slow where you are, then you can negotiate the commission fairly easily. If things are busy, then it could be more difficult. It's not unethical to haggle over the fee.
That being said, you'll probably find it easier just to hire an agent. They can list property on the MLS, while you can't.
That being said, you'll probably find it easier just to hire an agent. They can list property on the MLS, while you can't.
http://www.flatfeegroup.com/?gclid=C...FQdyQgodiS4AaQ
http://www.flatfeegroup.com/NewJersey/
Last edited by Michael; Jun 12th 2013 at 11:08 pm.