Safe cars in California
#31
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 41,518
Re: Safe cars in California
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has reaffirmed the 5-star safety rating of the Tesla Model S overall and in all subcategories for Model Year 2014, confirming the highest safety rating in America.
It's beautiful car but you need a minimum of $69,900 to get one.
http://www.teslamotors.com/about/pre...odel-year-2014
Tesla also has free super charging stations throughout the US. which gives 170 miles of range for a 1/2 hour charge but if you are on the road and too far from a super charging station, you have to check in to a motel and use the portable charger that will fully charge it in about 8 hours.
It's beautiful car but you need a minimum of $69,900 to get one.
http://www.teslamotors.com/about/pre...odel-year-2014
Tesla also has free super charging stations throughout the US. which gives 170 miles of range for a 1/2 hour charge but if you are on the road and too far from a super charging station, you have to check in to a motel and use the portable charger that will fully charge it in about 8 hours.
#35
Re: Safe cars in California
I've seen the Tesla roadsters on the streets but wasn't overly impressed at $120K and up. I think the model S is much more refined and apparently so do it's customers since Tesla quit making the roadster after introducing the model s.
#36
Re: Safe cars in California
Every other car at my work place seems to be a Tesla Model S. They are quite a nice looking car, but I just couldn't ever bring myself to buy what is a glorified milk float!
#37
Just Joined
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 9
Re: Safe cars in California
This thread got busy overnight!
Whilst the idea of an electric car is tempting, unfortunately they aren't viable for my daily usage. Try are the future though! When I don't have to own a car and can simply request, via my iPhone 64, a driverless electric car to take me to work, I'll be very happy.
I do not at all subscribe to the "bigger is safer" idea because with new cars that simply isn't the case. Similarly, the Kia Cee'd is an excellent car with a 7 year warranty.
However, I will never buy a new car so am restricted to cars just after the previously mentioned 4 year depreciation point.
Thanks to everybody for the links. I'll be sure to peruse those and if I find a 4 year old, safe, somewhat fuel efficient wagon I'll let everybody know!
Whilst the idea of an electric car is tempting, unfortunately they aren't viable for my daily usage. Try are the future though! When I don't have to own a car and can simply request, via my iPhone 64, a driverless electric car to take me to work, I'll be very happy.
I do not at all subscribe to the "bigger is safer" idea because with new cars that simply isn't the case. Similarly, the Kia Cee'd is an excellent car with a 7 year warranty.
However, I will never buy a new car so am restricted to cars just after the previously mentioned 4 year depreciation point.
Thanks to everybody for the links. I'll be sure to peruse those and if I find a 4 year old, safe, somewhat fuel efficient wagon I'll let everybody know!
#40
Re: Safe cars in California
For most British-trained drivers, keeping your vehicle upright and on the road shouldn't be a problem. It is the other idiots that people need to worry about, and if a Crown Vic or a Suburban is going to come barreling into me, I would recommend not being in a hatchback made of tin foil.
#42
Account Closed
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,570
Re: Safe cars in California
With the grid road system in Phoenix we have mostly three lanes in each direction and people generally doing 50 mph. My main concern is getting T-boned by a truck (of which there are plenty) in my little sports sedan at an intersection. I've seen enough nasty T bone accidents at the intersections to instinctively look left and right when the light turn green.
Having said that i think safety has quiet a bit to do with more than just impact. A safe vehicle to drive is one in which i can both accelerate and stop quickly in order to avoid trouble. Vehicle stability control, blind spot monitors, lane guidance etc, I don't think any of these feature in the crash test ratings do they?
I feel safer in my G35s than i do in my bus (Honda Odyssey). The G35 stops on a dime. The brakes on the Odyssey are as soft as hell, with six passengers and trunk full of cases its a death trap.
Having said that i think safety has quiet a bit to do with more than just impact. A safe vehicle to drive is one in which i can both accelerate and stop quickly in order to avoid trouble. Vehicle stability control, blind spot monitors, lane guidance etc, I don't think any of these feature in the crash test ratings do they?
I feel safer in my G35s than i do in my bus (Honda Odyssey). The G35 stops on a dime. The brakes on the Odyssey are as soft as hell, with six passengers and trunk full of cases its a death trap.
#43
Re: Safe cars in California
We just bought the Hyundai Elantra to replace our Subaru Outback that got in a crash with a GMC truck - the Subaru was completely wrecked but the Mrs was totally fine. The dude in the GMC truck somehow broke most of his fingers and had cuts and bruises. His truck looked totally fine however.
There's something to be said for cars made out of 'tinfoil' that crumple up and absorb shock..
There's something to be said for cars made out of 'tinfoil' that crumple up and absorb shock..
#44
Re: Safe cars in California
There are too many variables to really know if one car is safer than another. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) both conduct safety tests..
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) conducts three frontal crash tests, a moderate overlap frontal test at 40 mph, a small overlap frontal test at 40 mph, and a 35 mph full frontal crash into a rigid barrier.
All of those are fine but what happens when a drunk or someone falls asleep at the wheel and crosses the lane into on coming traffic at 60 miles per hour (equivalent of 120 miles per hour if two on coming cars hit)? Also on a total frontal impact, the G force in the lighter car will be greater than the heavier car pushing the lighter car backwards.
The same is true with rear and side crashes. They may be able to simulate what could happen when a semi tractor trailer rear ends or side swipes a vehicle but I doubt anyone really wants to know.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) conducts three frontal crash tests, a moderate overlap frontal test at 40 mph, a small overlap frontal test at 40 mph, and a 35 mph full frontal crash into a rigid barrier.
All of those are fine but what happens when a drunk or someone falls asleep at the wheel and crosses the lane into on coming traffic at 60 miles per hour (equivalent of 120 miles per hour if two on coming cars hit)? Also on a total frontal impact, the G force in the lighter car will be greater than the heavier car pushing the lighter car backwards.
The same is true with rear and side crashes. They may be able to simulate what could happen when a semi tractor trailer rear ends or side swipes a vehicle but I doubt anyone really wants to know.
Last edited by Michael; May 29th 2014 at 9:37 am.
#45
Re: Safe cars in California
All of those are fine but what happens when a drunk or someone falls asleep at the wheel and crosses the lane into on coming traffic at 60 miles per hour (equivalent of 120 miles per hour if two on coming cars hit)? Also on a total frontal impact, the G force in the lighter car will be greater than the heavier car pushing the lighter car backwards.