OT: Feeding Tube removal
#1
I love Marmite, she don't
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 454
OT: Feeding Tube removal
With this story making such big headlines I wonder what everyone else thinks in this emotionally charged debate.
1. I know for a fact, if *I* were the one in that chair, I would want them to remove the tube and preferably give me an injection. Since the injection is not an option, I'd still want the tube pulled. I would NOT want to live like that OR have the burden of that decision placed on my loved ones. I have made a living will to say, "let me go" if I am incapable of making that decision. Most parents would want to keep their child alive and you could argue, they are not making the right decisions for the right reasons, they are *too* close - sad as that statement seems.
What would YOU do ?
2. In the UK, the law says, if you are certified brain dead (as this lady is - in a vegative state), they have to pull the plug and the decision isn't a national tug-of-war heart wrenching debate.
Do you agree with the UK law ?
3. Pro-lifers "God's choice" don't have a say in this as their argument falls apart since God has made his decision already and man is already interfering here. I am a Christian and believe man can interfere too much. heck, with today's technology we could keep everyone "alive" forever.
Do you think we should keep everyone "alive" forever, no matter what ? We can with today's technology do just that.
1. I know for a fact, if *I* were the one in that chair, I would want them to remove the tube and preferably give me an injection. Since the injection is not an option, I'd still want the tube pulled. I would NOT want to live like that OR have the burden of that decision placed on my loved ones. I have made a living will to say, "let me go" if I am incapable of making that decision. Most parents would want to keep their child alive and you could argue, they are not making the right decisions for the right reasons, they are *too* close - sad as that statement seems.
What would YOU do ?
2. In the UK, the law says, if you are certified brain dead (as this lady is - in a vegative state), they have to pull the plug and the decision isn't a national tug-of-war heart wrenching debate.
Do you agree with the UK law ?
3. Pro-lifers "God's choice" don't have a say in this as their argument falls apart since God has made his decision already and man is already interfering here. I am a Christian and believe man can interfere too much. heck, with today's technology we could keep everyone "alive" forever.
Do you think we should keep everyone "alive" forever, no matter what ? We can with today's technology do just that.
#2
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 475
Re: OT: Feeding Tube removal
They have removed it now.....
#3
I love Marmite, she don't
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 454
Re: OT: Feeding Tube removal
Originally Posted by britchicknyc
They have removed it now.....
#4
Re: OT: Feeding Tube removal
Originally Posted by franc111s
This is the 3rd time they have removed it, only to put it back again - all so sad... I probably shouldn't have started this topic on reflection. I just wanted to see who was feeling what.
What really gets me .. Is the protestors outside the hospice ..all dissappear when the TV cameras go ...... The web site the family have which purports to show here responding .. is sick...
#5
Re: OT: Feeding Tube removal
Originally Posted by britchicknyc
They have removed it now.....
NC Penguin
#6
Re: OT: Feeding Tube removal
Originally Posted by franc111s
2. In the UK, the law says, if you are certified brain dead (as this lady is - in a vegative state), they have to pull the plug and the decision isn't a national tug-of-war heart wrenching debate.
Do you agree with the UK law ?
Do you agree with the UK law ?
they want to remove the feeding tube, which means starving her to death. would i like to starve to death no. not a nice way to die imho.
#7
Re: OT: Feeding Tube removal
Originally Posted by NC Penguin
I heard on NPR this morning that it could take as long as two weeks before the lady dies, even without the tube....
NC Penguin
NC Penguin
#8
Re: OT: Feeding Tube removal
Originally Posted by ironporer
...plus her husband seems like such a slimey piece of shit.
#9
Re: OT: Feeding Tube removal
Originally Posted by Ray
From what I see its the opposite...
http://www.wftv.com/news/4253036/detail.html
http://www.nationalledger.com/commen...cle_1211.shtml
#10
Re: OT: Feeding Tube removal
Originally Posted by ironporer
I could be wrong...it just seems some reports I have heard are quite against him.
http://www.wftv.com/news/4253036/detail.html
http://www.nationalledger.com/commen...cle_1211.shtml
http://www.wftv.com/news/4253036/detail.html
http://www.nationalledger.com/commen...cle_1211.shtml
#11
I love Marmite, she don't
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 454
Re: OT: Feeding Tube removal
Originally Posted by candy wy.
there is no plug to pull though.. she is not being kept alive by machines,
they want to remove the feeding tube, which means starving her to death. would i like to starve to death no. not a nice way to die imho.
they want to remove the feeding tube, which means starving her to death. would i like to starve to death no. not a nice way to die imho.
*** If she can feel the pain of starving to death then WHAT PAIN do you think she is feeling as a 15 year cabbage ? ****
People do actually kill themselves by starving themselves to death. The body has a weird way of "shutting" down to prevent you even feeling the same level of pain - EVEN IF I beleived she was in pain - which I don't.
I'd take 2 weeks of starving versus the 15 years of zip - wouldn't you - really ?
#12
Re: OT: Feeding Tube removal
Originally Posted by neil
It's probably difficult to judge in a case like this. I would say that if it was his wife's wish that she were not kept alive artificially then it would be extremely difficult for him to watch her going through something she expressly said she didn't want; and as for the parents, I personally can't understand their point of view if medical opinion goes against any hope they might have that she would return to normal. My parents know that I wouldn't want to be kept alive if I were never to have a reasonable quality of life and I would hope they're strong enough to stick to that.
#13
Re: OT: Feeding Tube removal
Originally Posted by Ray
Its all a dispute about MONEY
NC Penguin
#14
Account Closed
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 8,266
Re: OT: Feeding Tube removal
She is NOT in a vegetative state.
It is ALL about money. Why didn't he give her parents care of her years ago? Because if he did that, he'd lose out on all the $$$$ that are coming to him the minute she is declared dead.
And then there are the 'rumors' that he slapped her around a tad, and might have actually been the cause of this (I can't recall it has been so long, but there was some 'hanky panky' going on from the start), and it is the reason he's refused ANY medical attention right from the get go.
It is ALL about money. Why didn't he give her parents care of her years ago? Because if he did that, he'd lose out on all the $$$$ that are coming to him the minute she is declared dead.
And then there are the 'rumors' that he slapped her around a tad, and might have actually been the cause of this (I can't recall it has been so long, but there was some 'hanky panky' going on from the start), and it is the reason he's refused ANY medical attention right from the get go.
#15
Re: OT: Feeding Tube removal
Originally Posted by NC Penguin
Hello. Back to that old chestut. I would've thought that the interests of the patient would have been the first and possibly only consideration...
NC Penguin
NC Penguin
The husband who by the way is a RN.. has already turned down 10 million to give the parents custody.. The husbands lawyers says there is about $40000 left ..
but his attorney has not been paid in two years ...the hospice is paid by medicaid now .. he has never accepted money .. the parent have accepted 1000s off donation to pay their lawyer, fake doctors and their own time ...