CaliforniaBride

Pre-ordered mine from Borders. Waiting eagerly for the call to tell me I can pick it up. Nothing like picking over the cadaver.

ex_exile

He hasnt actually EVER been convicted of a crime yet, maybe we should wait until he has been before we lock him up.

He didnt kill Nicole anyway, but he knew / knows who did.

CaliforniaBride

He knew? Does that mean he's forgotten?

Maz

Last I heard, he was busy trawling the golf courses of America to find the culprit.

ironporer

So this time (in the book) did he also stalk her, find her with an unfortunate young man returning a pair of glasses, then hack both of them to pieces with a knife...nearly severing her head, meanwhile splattering his clothes, shoes and gloves with blood...only to hit his hear on Kato's air conditioner while sneaking back home alongside the pool house, drop one glove there to be found by "racist" police...???


Kinda fitting that now he may be arrested for armed robbery in Vegas.

ex_exile

No, it means he knew at the time and still knows, rather than discovering at a later date. But believing in the US justice system he didnt feel the need to give up the killer being confident that the fact he was inocent would get him acquited

CaliforniaBride

Well done, now explain rhetorical.

Ray

I must have watched different evidence and court case
than you did ... and the events leading up to his arrest ..

ex_exile

I think maybe you should look up rhetorical if you are relating it to your original post or my response to it

Yeah when officer Furlman was asked on the stand whether he had planted any evidence on OJ and he invoked his fifth ammendment rights, classic TV. You do remember that bit dont you?

CaliforniaBride

Ok, just for you....

rhe·tor·i·cal –adjective 1.used for, belonging to, or concerned with mere style or effect.

CaliforniaBride

Me! Me! Ask me! I remember, I do!

ex_exile

I see someone at the back with their hand up.....

CaliforniaBride

Thanks Sir.

SEPTEMBER 6 - Former detective Mark Fuhrman returned to the witness stand and invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked whether he lied or planted evidence or filed false reports in the O.J. Simpson investigation.
Fuhrman, who previously testified to finding a bloody glove on Simpson's estate the day after the murders, refused to answer a series of questions from defense attorney Gerald Uelmen.
Among them were: "Was the testimony that you gave in the preliminary hearing in this case completely truthful?" "Have you ever falsified a police report?" and "Did you plant or manufacture any evidence in this case?"
In each instance, Fuhrman turned to his lawyer, Darryl Mounger, then declared, "I wish to assert my Fifth Amendment privilege."

http://www.courttv.com/trials/ojsimp....html#continue



That's from the Court TV website. The same station that covered the trial I believe. I think Ray was absent that day, Sir.

Sally

Yes

Oh sorry read a bit further.

Awful, makes me feel sick, no way would I touch it.

Sally

We hear some shit on here - but that takes the biscuit.