![]() |
Re: Long Term LA/SF Views
Originally Posted by Moses2013
(Post 11475123)
Exactly, so why move if it's just as bad or worse. Forget London anyway, as San Francisco and London are two complete different cities.
|
Re: Long Term LA/SF Views
Originally Posted by Hotscot
(Post 11475134)
Not even the desperate ones? :)
|
Re: Long Term LA/SF Views
Originally Posted by Michael
(Post 11475136)
Yah, it is so much better to compare it to your little village.:rolleyes:
|
Re: Long Term LA/SF Views
Originally Posted by Hotscot
(Post 11475106)
What do you mean a generalization?
Are you saying that the Bay Area generally has no traffic congestion? When I lived in Mountain View - my commute was about 20 mins by bike - and we planned it that way when we chose the house. So for me traffic congestion really wasn't an issue. |
Re: Long Term LA/SF Views
Originally Posted by Michael
(Post 11475135)
You often seem to take the worst case situation and consider it the norm.
However on the roads I mentioned it does seem to be the norm:) Just like the 405 and 5 during rush times in LA. Some accept it as the cost of living there. I simply indicated that for me it would be unacceptable. And one of the reasons I'll be glad to say goodbye to the LA area. |
Re: Long Term LA/SF Views
I'm a native Californian. Grew up in the San Fernando Valley. Lived in San Francisco for law school and several years thereafter. I then returned home to Los Angeles. I never moved back to the "Valley" and now live in "Los Feliz" area of Los Angeles.
Each area has its advantages and disadvantages and I'll leave it at that. |
Re: Long Term LA/SF Views
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 11475138)
You'd have to be pretty desperate to want your places. TO is all right, as I said on the other thread. You've got the Civic Arts Plaza showing the Nutcracker and such.
I was thinking of those who may undergo a forced move due to the lack of job security for example. Good intentions to be stable and prosperous in the chosen location but then real life can intrude and plans go awry. |
Re: Long Term LA/SF Views
Originally Posted by Hotscot
(Post 11475147)
No. I only say it does happen.
However on the roads I mentioned it does seem to be the norm:) Just like the 405 and 5 during rush times in LA. Some accept it as the cost of living there. I simply indicated that for me it would be unacceptable. And one of the reasons I'll be glad to say goodbye to the LA area. |
Re: Long Term LA/SF Views
Originally Posted by S Folinsky
(Post 11475151)
I'm a native Californian. Grew up in the San Fernando Valley. Lived in San Francisco for law school and several years thereafter. I then returned home to Los Angeles. I never moved back to the "Valley" and now live in "Los Feliz" area of Los Angeles.
Each area has its advantages and disadvantages and I'll leave it at that. |
Re: Long Term LA/SF Views
Originally Posted by Hotscot
(Post 11475154)
I was thinking of those who may undergo a forced move due to the lack of job security for example.
Good intentions to be stable and prosperous in the chosen location but then real life can intrude and plans go awry. |
Re: Long Term LA/SF Views
Originally Posted by fozzyb
(Post 11475146)
Again - all depends so much on individual factors.
When I lived in Mountain View - my commute was about 20 mins by bike - and we planned it that way when we chose the house. So for me traffic congestion really wasn't an issue. Traffic in MV (as anywhere) can be silly though, my daughter has lots of friends living by the high school. If I have to take her there after work it can take me 30 minutes, due to all the lights... and it's only 5 miles. |
Re: Long Term LA/SF Views
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 11475141)
What on Earth are you on about?
|
Re: Long Term LA/SF Views
Originally Posted by N1cky
(Post 11475173)
Hubby now commutes to Burlingame each day, 27 miles. Luckily he doesn't have to be in for set times, so he leaves the house around 9.15, and for home around 7pm. The journey takes him around 30 minutes. If he leaves earlier he just sits in traffic and his commute time doubles.
Traffic in MV (as anywhere) can be silly though, my daughter has lots of friends living by the high school. If I have to take her there after work it can take me 30 minutes, due to all the lights... and it's only 5 miles. So when I do experience it, LA, SF, Houston, Boston or elsewhere...:thumbdown: (I realize that individual members here may have perfectly reasonable commutes in the cities but many commuters are stuck in traffic every day.) |
Re: Long Term LA/SF Views
Originally Posted by Moses2013
(Post 11475116)
Well London is a capital and probably still more affordable. Maybe not Central, but a hippie would probably have more options in London these days.
They're all minted, seriously minted. |
Re: Long Term LA/SF Views
Does that not make them hipsters?
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 4:15 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.