IRS v Inland Revenue
#1
IRS v Inland Revenue
Thought this might be interesting. Bearing in mind that my wife and I are retired we like everyone else have filed our taxes. If we were living in the UK and assuming my tax code to be 499L I would be paying 14 times more on taxes than what I am paying here for 2005/2006. I have assumed $1.74/£.
For me retirement here is pretty good.
For me retirement here is pretty good.
#2
Re: IRS v Inland Revenue
Not bad for some then
Though do think your a bit lucky, but that's always nice when the cookie crumbles nicely
Though do think your a bit lucky, but that's always nice when the cookie crumbles nicely
#3
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,296
Re: IRS v Inland Revenue
Originally Posted by tony126
Thought this might be interesting. Bearing in mind that my wife and I are retired we like everyone else have filed our taxes. If we were living in the UK and assuming my tax code to be 499L I would be paying 14 times more on taxes than what I am paying here for 2005/2006. I have assumed $1.74/£.
For me retirement here is pretty good.
For me retirement here is pretty good.
Tony - do you get your UK state pension paid directly into your bank here in dollars or paid into a Uk bank and draw it out over here? If over here are there any bank charges- I heard somewhere that if its a pension paid into your account here they make no charges-don't know how true that is. We have to tell the Dept of Pensions where we want the pension paid soon- as hubby is 65 in August.
#4
Homebody
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: HOME
Posts: 23,181
Re: IRS v Inland Revenue
Originally Posted by tony126
Thought this might be interesting. Bearing in mind that my wife and I are retired we like everyone else have filed our taxes. If we were living in the UK and assuming my tax code to be 499L I would be paying 14 times more on taxes than what I am paying here for 2005/2006. I have assumed $1.74/£.
For me retirement here is pretty good.
For me retirement here is pretty good.
Interesting.
I have just completed our annual financial summary.
State and federal tax, property tax, Medicare contributions, SS tax, medical insurance and co-pays/deductibles/not covered bits,....
... together account for a whopping 35% of my husband gross salary.
To this I have to add another $100 or so a month for disability insurance and the like, which must be considered mandatory here since there is not much of a safety net - unlike incapacity benefit and the like in the UK.
Just as well I'm not likely to get pregnant again since maternity pay seems to be a foreign concept here...
Ah well, at least the weather's nice
#5
Re: IRS v Inland Revenue
Originally Posted by Elvira
Just as well I'm not likely to get pregnant again since maternity pay seems to be a foreign concept here...
#6
Re: IRS v Inland Revenue
Originally Posted by Taffyles
Tony - do you get your UK state pension paid directly into your bank here in dollars or paid into a Uk bank and draw it out over here? If over here are there any bank charges- I heard somewhere that if its a pension paid into your account here they make no charges-don't know how true that is. We have to tell the Dept of Pensions where we want the pension paid soon- as hubby is 65 in August.
#7
Re: IRS v Inland Revenue
Originally Posted by Elvira
Interesting.
I have just completed our annual financial summary.
I have just completed our annual financial summary.
#8
Re: IRS v Inland Revenue
Originally Posted by tony126
Thought this might be interesting. Bearing in mind that my wife and I are retired we like everyone else have filed our taxes. If we were living in the UK and assuming my tax code to be 499L I would be paying 14 times more on taxes than what I am paying here for 2005/2006. I have assumed $1.74/£.
For me retirement here is pretty good.
For me retirement here is pretty good.
Enjoy.
Reg. Frank R.
#9
Re: IRS v Inland Revenue
I got it wrong. The figure should read about 5 times not 14. Should have sought the advice of this particular Chartered Accountant ( my garandaughter)prior to posting. Sorry for giving the wrong impression.
#10
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,820
Re: IRS v Inland Revenue
I leave all the tax stuff to the Missus ............ She seems to get it right each year because we get at least $4,000 back every year .......... buys a holiday in the UK each time.
As far as the pension thing goes. I have an old company pension from the UK which is still growing and I can claim a lump sum at 60 or wait till 65 and get it in monthly payments, I get a statement every year and it seems to be growing well. I am told by the NI in the UK that I will also get a UK pension on retirement.......... I am not counting on that though.
When I came here I contacted the IR and signed a form to say I would not work in the UK for 7 years and got all my tax back for the year I left.
As far as the pension thing goes. I have an old company pension from the UK which is still growing and I can claim a lump sum at 60 or wait till 65 and get it in monthly payments, I get a statement every year and it seems to be growing well. I am told by the NI in the UK that I will also get a UK pension on retirement.......... I am not counting on that though.
When I came here I contacted the IR and signed a form to say I would not work in the UK for 7 years and got all my tax back for the year I left.
#11
Re: IRS v Inland Revenue
Originally Posted by Elvira
Interesting.
I have just completed our annual financial summary.
State and federal tax, property tax, Medicare contributions, SS tax, medical insurance and co-pays/deductibles/not covered bits,....
... together account for a whopping 35% of my husband gross salary. .....
I have just completed our annual financial summary.
State and federal tax, property tax, Medicare contributions, SS tax, medical insurance and co-pays/deductibles/not covered bits,....
... together account for a whopping 35% of my husband gross salary. .....
The last time I worked out comparative tax figures, I had been paying about 30% in "payroll taxes" (compulsory deductions - income tax, and NI) in the UK (2000/01 figures), as compared to about 24% in the US (income tax, medical insurance, and other compulsory deductions).
My property taxes are virtually the same as in London, but now I have a four bed house on over one acre, as opposed to a two bed terrace on 3/100 of an acre!
#12
Account Closed
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,271
Re: IRS v Inland Revenue
We are definitely better off TAX wise. We have more materially also. But cost of living to earnings ratio is probably about the same. And the weathers better.
#13
Re: IRS v Inland Revenue
Originally Posted by Angry White Pyjamas
..... And the weather's better. ....
As we walked we had a conversation along the lines of, "it is cold and miserable here, .... if we make it to executive/ partner levels (of pay) then it might be worth staying in London long term, ....... but otherwise it would be better to go and live somewhere where the weather is warmer."
I lost contact with the other guy, though I remember the conversation as if it was yesterday, and I sometimes wonder if he is still in London. I, however, moved to NC, and find life a whole lot more agreeable than life in London!
#14
Account Closed
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,271
Re: IRS v Inland Revenue
Originally Posted by Pulaski
Back in the early 90's, living in London, I left work one evening in late January and walked to the tube station with a colleague. It was, needless to say, pitch dark already, bitterly cold, and, of course, raining.
As we walked we had a conversation along the lines of, "it is cold and miserable here, .... if we make it to executive/ partner levels (of pay) then it might be worth staying in London long term, ....... but otherwise it would be better to go and live somewhere where the weather is warmer."
I lost contact with the other guy, though I remember the conversation as if it was yesterday, and I sometimes wonder if he is still in London. I, however, moved to NC, and find life a whole lot more agreeable than life in London!
As we walked we had a conversation along the lines of, "it is cold and miserable here, .... if we make it to executive/ partner levels (of pay) then it might be worth staying in London long term, ....... but otherwise it would be better to go and live somewhere where the weather is warmer."
I lost contact with the other guy, though I remember the conversation as if it was yesterday, and I sometimes wonder if he is still in London. I, however, moved to NC, and find life a whole lot more agreeable than life in London!
Got to admit, as beautiful as the Yorkshire countryside is I am rather having a good time here myself at the moment.
#15
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,820
Re: IRS v Inland Revenue
Each has it's pro's and con's ........... I could never afford a house like the one I live in here if I lived back in the UK, it would cost half a million.
But then I have no pub to pop down to when I want a pint unless I want to drive 30 miles or more and the winters here are enough to make me wish I still lived in a rabit hutch back in the UK. .......... Then along comes a glorious summer to take all those doubts away
But then I have no pub to pop down to when I want a pint unless I want to drive 30 miles or more and the winters here are enough to make me wish I still lived in a rabit hutch back in the UK. .......... Then along comes a glorious summer to take all those doubts away