Immigration change
#1
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2015
Location: Valencia, CA
Posts: 69
Immigration change
President Trump and two GOP senators are announcing a new plan to drastically cut legal immigration into the United States.
https://www.facebook.com/NowThisPoli...0618481636302/
Currently live, but will show full video when finished.
https://www.facebook.com/NowThisPoli...0618481636302/
Currently live, but will show full video when finished.
Last edited by leepne; Aug 2nd 2017 at 3:50 pm.
#2
Forum Regular
Joined: Nov 2015
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 110
Re: Immigration change
Currently 18 months in on L1A and L2. I'll be asking the wife to have that GC chat soon! While not worried about qualifying, who knows when this will start and what disruption it will cause
#3
Banned
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 153
Re: Immigration change
They should get rid of the diversity lottery. You shouldn't be able to win a life in another country in a lottery draw. And they should axe the family based visas. They are a joke. Aren't their people been waiting 20 years to get their family visas. I am surprised Trump isn't proposing polygraphing for marriage fraud and repealing immigration through same sex marriage to be prevent sham marriage on the part of females.
#5
Home and Happy
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Keep true friends and puppets close, trust no-one else...
Posts: 93,810
Re: Immigration change
They should get rid of the diversity lottery. You shouldn't be able to win a life in another country in a lottery draw. And they should axe the family based visas. They are a joke. Aren't their people been waiting 20 years to get their family visas. I am surprised Trump isn't proposing polygraphing for marriage fraud and repealing immigration through same sex marriage to be prevent sham marriage on the part of females.
#6
Re: Immigration change
plus ca change....
I'm not going to hold my breath. Has Trump actually managed to change anything at all yet?
I'm not going to hold my breath. Has Trump actually managed to change anything at all yet?
#7
Re: Immigration change
They should get rid of the diversity lottery. You shouldn't be able to win a life in another country in a lottery draw. And they should axe the family based visas. They are a joke. Aren't their people been waiting 20 years to get their family visas. I am surprised Trump isn't proposing polygraphing for marriage fraud and repealing immigration through same sex marriage to be prevent sham marriage on the part of females.
However, this time you have outdone yourself.
I have no clue what correlation you're drawing between same sex marriage, sham marriages and females.
#10
Banned
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 153
Re: Immigration change
How many neurotic american women would engage in sham marriage with none american female friends to keep or get them in the country? I wonder how many times it has happened? I bet it has. And how would you stop it. Polygraph? You polygraph gay marriage you have to got to polygraph straight marriage.
#12
Re: Immigration change
How many neurotic american women would engage in sham marriage with none american female friends to keep or get them in the country? I wonder how many times it has happened? I bet it has. And how would you stop it. Polygraph? You polygraph gay marriage you have to got to polygraph straight marriage.
#13
Banned
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 153
Re: Immigration change
I can't see them accusing gays of lying without going after straight people in the same vein. I am sure it has happened and with trumps attitudes to women I am surprised he hasn't said something. Maybe going after the gays would be step to far for Trump and he knows it.
#14
Re: Immigration change
It's not an immigration "reform" bill, they're lying (for a change).
All it does is repeal the DV lottery and massively tighten the quota for family-based preference categories, and it removes the ability of a US citizen to sponsor in their parents and replaces it with a non-immigrant category for that instead (so the parents could never work or qualify for Medicare). The only positive reform in it is that spouses of LPRs wouldn't have to wait for a visa number.
It doesn't mention employment-based anything at all.
That appears to all be in the realms of regulatory change, which they could do, but without upping the quota for EB categories, it's largely meaningless. You'd still need a job offer from an employer, so adding on other requirements like English language proficiency is window dressing.
What they're really talking about is a huge cut in immigration by making it nearly impossible to immigrate through a preference category. Most immigration would still be via marriage to a US citizen.
All it does is repeal the DV lottery and massively tighten the quota for family-based preference categories, and it removes the ability of a US citizen to sponsor in their parents and replaces it with a non-immigrant category for that instead (so the parents could never work or qualify for Medicare). The only positive reform in it is that spouses of LPRs wouldn't have to wait for a visa number.
It doesn't mention employment-based anything at all.
That appears to all be in the realms of regulatory change, which they could do, but without upping the quota for EB categories, it's largely meaningless. You'd still need a job offer from an employer, so adding on other requirements like English language proficiency is window dressing.
What they're really talking about is a huge cut in immigration by making it nearly impossible to immigrate through a preference category. Most immigration would still be via marriage to a US citizen.
#15
Re: Immigration change
It will make virtually zero difference to EB categories and it stands zero chance of passing Congress anyway. Already a bunch of Republicans come out against it.