Is Hollywood portraying an anti-war view of terrorism?
Jan 6th 2006, 4:05 am
#31
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: SC
Posts: 4,153
Re: Is Hollywood portraying an anti-war view of terrorism?
Originally Posted by Chorlton
Or if a news organisation would stick to presenting the facts, and letting us form our own opinions 
Jan 6th 2006, 4:08 am
#32
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,750
Re: Is Hollywood portraying an anti-war view of terrorism?
Originally Posted by tony126
In your wildest dreams.
Jan 6th 2006, 4:11 am
#33
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: SC
Posts: 4,153
Re: Is Hollywood portraying an anti-war view of terrorism?
At least readers of BE can see there is no bias here, just a majority of people who think alike. 
Last edited by tony126; Jan 6th 2006 at 4:14 am.
Jan 6th 2006, 5:47 am
#34
I approved this message
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,425
Re: Is Hollywood portraying an anti-war view of terrorism?
Originally Posted by anotherlimey
When I said not-for-profit news stations, I meant companies/organisations that produce content and don't make money from it.
Little Green Footballs, for example, broke the story that the documents CBS News used to question Bush's military record (I'm not getting into this one) were forgeries. The story basically got Dan Rather fired.
Matt Drudge (owner of The Dudge Report) has literally millions of readers, it's one of the heaviest tracked news sites online. Reference to his site show in major publications all the time.
Also, commentators from the Heritage Foundation and Hoover Institution (both of which are entirely non-profit) show up in major newspapers, on NPR, in the NY Times and WSJ etc every day.
Last edited by Hiro11; Jan 6th 2006 at 5:50 am.
Jan 6th 2006, 6:50 am
#35
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,578
Re: Is Hollywood portraying an anti-war view of terrorism?
Originally Posted by Hiro11
All of those organizations produce widely read and very influential content and don't make any money from it or are at least not professionally run.
Little Green Footballs, for example, broke the story that the documents CBS News used to question Bush's military record (I'm not getting into this one) were forgeries. The story basically got Dan Rather fired.
Matt Drudge (owner of The Dudge Report) has literally millions of readers, it's one of the heaviest tracked news sites online. Reference to his site show in major publications all the time.
Also, commentators from the Heritage Foundation and Hoover Institution (both of which are entirely non-profit) show up in major newspapers, on NPR, in the NY Times and WSJ etc every day.
Little Green Footballs, for example, broke the story that the documents CBS News used to question Bush's military record (I'm not getting into this one) were forgeries. The story basically got Dan Rather fired.
Matt Drudge (owner of The Dudge Report) has literally millions of readers, it's one of the heaviest tracked news sites online. Reference to his site show in major publications all the time.
Also, commentators from the Heritage Foundation and Hoover Institution (both of which are entirely non-profit) show up in major newspapers, on NPR, in the NY Times and WSJ etc every day.
To me, those people looked like bloggers.
